A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » AMD x86-64 Processors
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CPU Path/754



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 18th 05, 05:07 AM
John Bottonari
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CPU Path/754

Is the 3700+ the fastest 754 that we'll see?

Thanks for reply.


  #2  
Old January 18th 05, 08:51 AM
Peter Strömberg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"John Bottonari" wrote in news:cQ0Hd.5784$Vx2.4160
@trndny01:

Is the 3700+ the fastest 754 that we'll see?


Most likely:

AMD CPU Roadmap Update

http://anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=2303

As we mentioned in the last update, all of the socket 754 chips are
scheduled for EOL by Q3'05; beyond that, Athlon 64 will only be available
on socket 939.

--
Peter Strömberg (55.6N 13.0E)
C2K2 C2K3 ISCCIV02 ISCCIV03 ISCCIV04
  #3  
Old January 18th 05, 09:21 AM
Wes Newell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 05:07:20 +0000, John Bottonari wrote:

Is the 3700+ the fastest 754 that we'll see?

unless you overclock it or one of the others, probably. And I wouldn't buy
a 3700+ anyway. The 3400+ runs at the same clock speed. The only
dofference between the 2 is the extra cache of the 3700+, 1M vs 512K, and
IMO, the extra PR rating is about as bogus as it gets. And the price
difference is ridiculous, $197 vs. $434 at this time. Gor 754, the 3400+
is the best deal going at this time. og course that can change it a matter
of hours with new product.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm
  #4  
Old January 19th 05, 05:23 PM
Antoine Leca
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

En , Peter Strömberg va
escriu
Is the 3700+ the fastest 754 that we'll see?

As we mentioned in the last update, all of the socket 754 chips are
scheduled for EOL by Q3'05; beyond that, Athlon 64 will only be
available on socket 939.


No Paris after that date? What will do the 130nm line then?

And since the Sempron PR seems to be quite a bit different ,
512KB=2800+, 256KB=3100+ ;-) so what @2.4GHz?), perhaps the "Sempron =
3500+" scheduled for Q1 '06 that your link mentions, could qualify.
Who knows? (my guess is that the mkg heads at AMD do not)


Antoine

  #5  
Old January 19th 05, 11:23 PM
Wes Newell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:23:39 +0100, Antoine Leca wrote:

En , Peter Strömberg va
escriu
Is the 3700+ the fastest 754 that we'll see?

As we mentioned in the last update, all of the socket 754 chips are
scheduled for EOL by Q3'05; beyond that, Athlon 64 will only be
available on socket 939.


No Paris after that date? What will do the 130nm line then?

And since the Sempron PR seems to be quite a bit different ,
512KB=2800+, 256KB=3100+ ;-) so what @2.4GHz?), perhaps the "Sempron =
3500+" scheduled for Q1 '06 that your link mentions, could qualify.
Who knows? (my guess is that the mkg heads at AMD do not)

There will be A64 cpu's for 754 for at the very least another 2 years. By
then the frist 939 boards will be obsolete too. No need to worry about
what will happen that far in advance.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.htm

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.