A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Nvidia Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Aquamark for 5600



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 16th 03, 08:19 PM
Lars A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Aquamark for 5600

mobo ASUS P4C800-E
detonator 45.23
FX5600 not Ultra version

Sco 15499
CPU: 10131 (OC'd bus=880mhz)
GFX: 1677

will mow install 51.75 and check what happens.


Lars A




  #2  
Old September 16th 03, 08:59 PM
Lars A
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And with 51.75 I got a 4.7% increase of FPS, a 5.3% increase of GFX per
second, but a 1.2% decrease in CPU.

Sco 16227 (CPU: 10007, GFX: 1767)

Lars A



"Lars A" skrev i meddelandet
news:[email protected]
mobo ASUS P4C800-E
detonator 45.23
FX5600 not Ultra version

Sco 15499
CPU: 10131 (OC'd bus=880mhz)
GFX: 1677

will mow install 51.75 and check what happens.


Lars A






  #3  
Old September 17th 03, 01:05 AM
Inglo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 9/16/2003 12:59 PM Lars A befouled our nation with:

And with 51.75 I got a 4.7% increase of FPS, a 5.3% increase of GFX per
second, but a 1.2% decrease in CPU.

Sco 16227 (CPU: 10007, GFX: 1767)

Lars A



"Lars A" skrev i meddelandet
news:[email protected]


mobo ASUS P4C800-E
detonator 45.23
FX5600 not Ultra version

Sco 15499
CPU: 10131 (OC'd bus=880mhz)
GFX: 1677

will mow install 51.75 and check what happens.


Lars A










With my XP2500/GF3 Ti500 45.23, I get:
GFX sco 1581
CPU sco 4121

AquaMark sco 13066

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=186478789

The GFX score difference between a FX 5600 and a two year old card is
only 90 pts. What exactly does that mean? Probably that I won't be
buying an FX 5600. The best Radeon 9600 (with approximately my
processor) scores seem to be pushing 30000 total.

--
Scientific American recently corrected an April news story that contended that, in one study, cloned pigs had variable numbers of teeth. In fact, they had variable numbers of teats.

Steve [Inglo]

  #4  
Old September 17th 03, 06:30 AM
Too_Much_Coffee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Inglo" wrote in message
m...
On 9/16/2003 12:59 PM Lars A befouled our nation with:

And with 51.75 I got a 4.7% increase of FPS, a 5.3% increase of GFX per
second, but a 1.2% decrease in CPU.

Sco 16227 (CPU: 10007, GFX: 1767)

Lars A



"Lars A" skrev i meddelandet
news:[email protected]


mobo ASUS P4C800-E
detonator 45.23
FX5600 not Ultra version

Sco 15499
CPU: 10131 (OC'd bus=880mhz)
GFX: 1677

will mow install 51.75 and check what happens.


Lars A










With my XP2500/GF3 Ti500 45.23, I get:
GFX sco 1581
CPU sco 4121

AquaMark sco 13066

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=186478789

The GFX score difference between a FX 5600 and a two year old card is
only 90 pts. What exactly does that mean? Probably that I won't be
buying an FX 5600. The best Radeon 9600 (with approximately my
processor) scores seem to be pushing 30000 total.



Back when I wanted to upgrade from a GF2MX, the best choice was the Ti4200
IMO. Today I think either the FX5600 Ultra or the ATI 9600 Pro would be the
best choice. For me now though the only upgrade choices, that I would be
pleased with, would be either the FX5900 Ultra or the ATI 9800 Pro; both are
WAAAAAAAY too expensive so I won't be upgrading anytime soon.

With a 2500+ @ 2.1GHz and a non-OC'd Ti4200, my AquaMark3 score was 18, 236.
According to the AM3 benchmark, a score of 20,000 is good. I can reach that
with a little OC.

My score is at the top: http://tinyurl.com/nful


Too_Much_Coffee

---
Got GigaNews?
http://www.giganews.com/customer/gn26215

--
Scientific American recently corrected an April news story that contended

that, in one study, cloned pigs had variable numbers of teeth. In fact, they
had variable numbers of teats.

Steve [Inglo]




  #5  
Old September 20th 03, 10:49 PM
Sith Lord
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:19:24 +0200 in
alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia, "Lars A" wrote:

mobo ASUS P4C800-E
detonator 45.23
FX5600 not Ultra version

Sco 15499
CPU: 10131 (OC'd bus=880mhz)
GFX: 1677


wot CPU?

Mine:
mobo: Abit KR7A
cpu: XP2000+
dets: 45.23
FX5600 (not ultra)
no overclocking

Sco 14,979
CPU: 5027
GFX: 1752


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
9800 Pro and Aquamark 3 (huge performance hit) Fitz Ati Videocards 11 October 20th 04 06:28 PM
Aquamark - What does it mean? Sandman Homebuilt PC's 1 August 5th 04 05:43 PM
Intel IG2 (865G) aquamark 3 EA Gigabyte Motherboards 0 July 14th 04 01:43 AM
Aquamark 3 *again* methylenedioxy Nvidia Videocards 10 September 23rd 03 09:56 AM
My system with a 5900 vs another's with an ATI 9800 (Aquamark scores) not me Nvidia Videocards 24 September 18th 03 04:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.