![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi folks.
I've decided that I *really* have to sort out my collection of crap... errrr.... my computers and parts. Therefore I'm building as many machines as I can from my spares collection and taking the rest of the hardware off to be recycled. I have a couple of 'integrated' motherboards ranging from PIII to Skt 775 / C2D. I also have a couple of low-end AGP cards and also two PCI (not 'e') GeForce 2 / 32MB cards. I'm trying to sort out which systems would benefit from the PCI cards. Obviously I don't want to put one in a system that has equal or better integrated graphics. I was just wondering, dows anyone know of a simple graphics benchmark utility that I could use to find out which systems would benefit? I have various '3DMark' programmes but they're all large and, for my porpoises, overly-complex. Also, as I intend to sell these systems as simple 'internet / email' machines I'd rather not install a huge programme that takes 15 minutes to run, then uninstall it. Orphaned .dlls and all that.... So, the question: Can anyone recommend a small, simple and fast graphics benchmark that would suit my purposes? All machines will be running XP. The ultimate app for me would be a 'portable' graphics benchmark tool that doesn't have to be installed, that could be run from a USB stick. TIA, and happy new year. :-) -- Shaun. "He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:20:11 +1300, "~misfit~"
wrote: Hi folks. snip So you post a request for help, then log in a few hours later and start slamming posters with snide comments? Let me be the first to cordially invite you to **** right off. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/31/2010 1:20 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
Hi folks. I've decided that I *really* have to sort out my collection of crap... errrr.... my computers and parts. Therefore I'm building as many machines as I can from my spares collection and taking the rest of the hardware off to be recycled. I have a couple of 'integrated' motherboards ranging from PIII to Skt 775 / C2D. I also have a couple of low-end AGP cards and also two PCI (not 'e') GeForce 2 / 32MB cards. I'm trying to sort out which systems would benefit from the PCI cards. Obviously I don't want to put one in a system that has equal or better integrated graphics. I was just wondering, dows anyone know of a simple graphics benchmark utility that I could use to find out which systems would benefit? I have various '3DMark' programmes but they're all large and, for my porpoises, overly-complex. Also, as I intend to sell these systems as simple 'internet / email' machines I'd rather not install a huge programme that takes 15 minutes to run, then uninstall it. Orphaned .dlls and all that.... So, the question: Can anyone recommend a small, simple and fast graphics benchmark that would suit my purposes? All machines will be running XP. The ultimate app for me would be a 'portable' graphics benchmark tool that doesn't have to be installed, that could be run from a USB stick. TIA, and happy new year. :-) To solve this one you don't even really need to benchmark it; the performance of most Intel integrated graphics chipsets is well known versus an old stanby like the GF2. For example; on the P3, I'd bet you have like an i815 or similar type chipset. That's only about as powerful as an original RivaTNT; so stick the GF2 in without a doubt (even if it is PCI). Plus it'll have faster VESA modes anyway. For the C2D; you might be dealing with the X3100 or something; and that's a more capable chip that's "almost" DX9 level and still beats the GF2 in capabilities. Not to mention that you might only have one or two PCI slots in that board to begin with. Otherwise the old standby for that generation of graphics cards was without a doubt 3dMark 2001. It scaled well for CPU speeds, so it was useful even years later to compare total system performance. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
~misfit~ wrote:
Hi folks. I've decided that I *really* have to sort out my collection of crap... errrr.... my computers and parts. Therefore I'm building as many machines as I can from my spares collection and taking the rest of the hardware off to be recycled. I have a couple of 'integrated' motherboards ranging from PIII to Skt 775 / C2D. I also have a couple of low-end AGP cards and also two PCI (not 'e') GeForce 2 / 32MB cards. I'm trying to sort out which systems would benefit from the PCI cards. Obviously I don't want to put one in a system that has equal or better integrated graphics. I was just wondering, dows anyone know of a simple graphics benchmark utility that I could use to find out which systems would benefit? I have various '3DMark' programmes but they're all large and, for my porpoises, overly-complex. Also, as I intend to sell these systems as simple 'internet / email' machines I'd rather not install a huge programme that takes 15 minutes to run, then uninstall it. Orphaned .dlls and all that.... So, the question: Can anyone recommend a small, simple and fast graphics benchmark that would suit my purposes? All machines will be running XP. The ultimate app for me would be a 'portable' graphics benchmark tool that doesn't have to be installed, that could be run from a USB stick. TIA, and happy new year. :-) 3DMark2001SE is 40MB, and the benchmark run is as simple as a single click. And the results, make old hardware look good :-) http://majorgeeks.com/3Dmark_d99.html PAul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Somewhere on teh intarwebs deimos wrote:
On 12/31/2010 1:20 AM, ~misfit~ wrote: Hi folks. I've decided that I *really* have to sort out my collection of crap... errrr.... my computers and parts. Therefore I'm building as many machines as I can from my spares collection and taking the rest of the hardware off to be recycled. I have a couple of 'integrated' motherboards ranging from PIII to Skt 775 / C2D. I also have a couple of low-end AGP cards and also two PCI (not 'e') GeForce 2 / 32MB cards. I'm trying to sort out which systems would benefit from the PCI cards. Obviously I don't want to put one in a system that has equal or better integrated graphics. I was just wondering, dows anyone know of a simple graphics benchmark utility that I could use to find out which systems would benefit? I have various '3DMark' programmes but they're all large and, for my porpoises, overly-complex. Also, as I intend to sell these systems as simple 'internet / email' machines I'd rather not install a huge programme that takes 15 minutes to run, then uninstall it. Orphaned .dlls and all that.... So, the question: Can anyone recommend a small, simple and fast graphics benchmark that would suit my purposes? All machines will be running XP. The ultimate app for me would be a 'portable' graphics benchmark tool that doesn't have to be installed, that could be run from a USB stick. TIA, and happy new year. :-) To solve this one you don't even really need to benchmark it; the performance of most Intel integrated graphics chipsets is well known versus an old stanby like the GF2. For example; on the P3, I'd bet you have like an i815 or similar type chipset. That's only about as powerful as an original RivaTNT; so stick the GF2 in without a doubt (even if it is PCI). Plus it'll have faster VESA modes anyway. For the C2D; you might be dealing with the X3100 or something; and that's a more capable chip that's "almost" DX9 level and still beats the GF2 in capabilities. Not to mention that you might only have one or two PCI slots in that board to begin with. Otherwise the old standby for that generation of graphics cards was without a doubt 3dMark 2001. It scaled well for CPU speeds, so it was useful even years later to compare total system performance. Thanks deimos, I appreciate your reply. Cheers, -- Shaun. "He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Somewhere on teh intarwebs Paul wrote:
~misfit~ wrote: Hi folks. I've decided that I *really* have to sort out my collection of crap... errrr.... my computers and parts. Therefore I'm building as many machines as I can from my spares collection and taking the rest of the hardware off to be recycled. I have a couple of 'integrated' motherboards ranging from PIII to Skt 775 / C2D. I also have a couple of low-end AGP cards and also two PCI (not 'e') GeForce 2 / 32MB cards. I'm trying to sort out which systems would benefit from the PCI cards. Obviously I don't want to put one in a system that has equal or better integrated graphics. I was just wondering, dows anyone know of a simple graphics benchmark utility that I could use to find out which systems would benefit? I have various '3DMark' programmes but they're all large and, for my porpoises, overly-complex. Also, as I intend to sell these systems as simple 'internet / email' machines I'd rather not install a huge programme that takes 15 minutes to run, then uninstall it. Orphaned .dlls and all that.... So, the question: Can anyone recommend a small, simple and fast graphics benchmark that would suit my purposes? All machines will be running XP. The ultimate app for me would be a 'portable' graphics benchmark tool that doesn't have to be installed, that could be run from a USB stick. TIA, and happy new year. :-) 3DMark2001SE is 40MB, and the benchmark run is as simple as a single click. And the results, make old hardware look good :-) http://majorgeeks.com/3Dmark_d99.html PAul Thanks Paul, I'll add it to my 'always in the pocket' USB stick. It's a shame it's not 'portable' but I guess you can't have everything. ;-) BTW, I hope that 2011 is good to you. I for one apreciate all of the good work that you do in the hardware groups, thanks again. -- Shaun. "He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Somewhere on teh intarwebs Foke wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:20:11 +1300, "~misfit~" wrote: Hi folks. snip So you post a request for help, then log in a few hours later and start slamming posters with snide comments? Let me be the first to cordially invite you to **** right off. Thanks for your reply. -- Shaun. "He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Q&A with AMD’s Rick Bergman on the graphics sweet spot | NV55 | Nvidia Videocards | 0 | November 30th 08 10:35 AM |
Looking for Motherboard (Core 2 Ready, SATA-II RAID-5 & Graphics) | Steve Baker | General | 7 | September 1st 06 06:43 PM |
Graphics card & LCD monitor died together... | [email protected] | General | 2 | July 23rd 06 09:15 PM |
Minimum res & graphics for CAD | Nicholas Andrade | Dell Computers | 0 | February 16th 06 05:01 PM |
P3B-F & New AGP Graphics Card? | Steven Hilgendorf | Asus Motherboards | 7 | November 3rd 05 04:53 PM |