A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Nvidia Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Q&D graphics benchmark?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 31st 10, 07:20 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
~misfit~[_15_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Q&D graphics benchmark?

Hi folks.

I've decided that I *really* have to sort out my collection of crap...
errrr.... my computers and parts. Therefore I'm building as many machines as
I can from my spares collection and taking the rest of the hardware off to
be recycled.

I have a couple of 'integrated' motherboards ranging from PIII to Skt 775 /
C2D. I also have a couple of low-end AGP cards and also two PCI (not 'e')
GeForce 2 / 32MB cards. I'm trying to sort out which systems would benefit
from the PCI cards. Obviously I don't want to put one in a system that has
equal or better integrated graphics.

I was just wondering, dows anyone know of a simple graphics benchmark
utility that I could use to find out which systems would benefit? I have
various '3DMark' programmes but they're all large and, for my porpoises,
overly-complex. Also, as I intend to sell these systems as simple 'internet
/ email' machines I'd rather not install a huge programme that takes 15
minutes to run, then uninstall it. Orphaned .dlls and all that....

So, the question: Can anyone recommend a small, simple and fast graphics
benchmark that would suit my purposes? All machines will be running XP. The
ultimate app for me would be a 'portable' graphics benchmark tool that
doesn't have to be installed, that could be run from a USB stick.

TIA, and happy new year. :-)
--
Shaun.

"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a
monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also
into you." Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche


  #2  
Old December 31st 10, 05:32 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
Foke[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 26
Default Q&D graphics benchmark?

On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:20:11 +1300, "~misfit~"
wrote:

Hi folks.


snip

So you post a request for help, then log in a few hours later and start
slamming posters with snide comments? Let me be the first to cordially
invite you to **** right off.
  #3  
Old January 1st 11, 09:35 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
deimos[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 225
Default Q&D graphics benchmark?

On 12/31/2010 1:20 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
Hi folks.

I've decided that I *really* have to sort out my collection of crap...
errrr.... my computers and parts. Therefore I'm building as many machines as
I can from my spares collection and taking the rest of the hardware off to
be recycled.

I have a couple of 'integrated' motherboards ranging from PIII to Skt 775 /
C2D. I also have a couple of low-end AGP cards and also two PCI (not 'e')
GeForce 2 / 32MB cards. I'm trying to sort out which systems would benefit
from the PCI cards. Obviously I don't want to put one in a system that has
equal or better integrated graphics.

I was just wondering, dows anyone know of a simple graphics benchmark
utility that I could use to find out which systems would benefit? I have
various '3DMark' programmes but they're all large and, for my porpoises,
overly-complex. Also, as I intend to sell these systems as simple 'internet
/ email' machines I'd rather not install a huge programme that takes 15
minutes to run, then uninstall it. Orphaned .dlls and all that....

So, the question: Can anyone recommend a small, simple and fast graphics
benchmark that would suit my purposes? All machines will be running XP. The
ultimate app for me would be a 'portable' graphics benchmark tool that
doesn't have to be installed, that could be run from a USB stick.

TIA, and happy new year. :-)


To solve this one you don't even really need to benchmark it; the
performance of most Intel integrated graphics chipsets is well known
versus an old stanby like the GF2.

For example; on the P3, I'd bet you have like an i815 or similar type
chipset. That's only about as powerful as an original RivaTNT; so stick
the GF2 in without a doubt (even if it is PCI). Plus it'll have faster
VESA modes anyway.

For the C2D; you might be dealing with the X3100 or something; and
that's a more capable chip that's "almost" DX9 level and still beats the
GF2 in capabilities. Not to mention that you might only have one or two
PCI slots in that board to begin with.

Otherwise the old standby for that generation of graphics cards was
without a doubt 3dMark 2001. It scaled well for CPU speeds, so it was
useful even years later to compare total system performance.
  #4  
Old January 1st 11, 10:28 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,364
Default Q&D graphics benchmark?

~misfit~ wrote:
Hi folks.

I've decided that I *really* have to sort out my collection of crap...
errrr.... my computers and parts. Therefore I'm building as many machines as
I can from my spares collection and taking the rest of the hardware off to
be recycled.

I have a couple of 'integrated' motherboards ranging from PIII to Skt 775 /
C2D. I also have a couple of low-end AGP cards and also two PCI (not 'e')
GeForce 2 / 32MB cards. I'm trying to sort out which systems would benefit
from the PCI cards. Obviously I don't want to put one in a system that has
equal or better integrated graphics.

I was just wondering, dows anyone know of a simple graphics benchmark
utility that I could use to find out which systems would benefit? I have
various '3DMark' programmes but they're all large and, for my porpoises,
overly-complex. Also, as I intend to sell these systems as simple 'internet
/ email' machines I'd rather not install a huge programme that takes 15
minutes to run, then uninstall it. Orphaned .dlls and all that....

So, the question: Can anyone recommend a small, simple and fast graphics
benchmark that would suit my purposes? All machines will be running XP. The
ultimate app for me would be a 'portable' graphics benchmark tool that
doesn't have to be installed, that could be run from a USB stick.

TIA, and happy new year. :-)


3DMark2001SE is 40MB, and the benchmark run is as simple
as a single click. And the results, make old hardware
look good :-)

http://majorgeeks.com/3Dmark_d99.html

PAul
  #5  
Old January 3rd 11, 02:30 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
~misfit~[_15_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Q&D graphics benchmark?

Somewhere on teh intarwebs deimos wrote:
On 12/31/2010 1:20 AM, ~misfit~ wrote:
Hi folks.

I've decided that I *really* have to sort out my collection of
crap... errrr.... my computers and parts. Therefore I'm building as
many machines as I can from my spares collection and taking the rest
of the hardware off to be recycled.

I have a couple of 'integrated' motherboards ranging from PIII to
Skt 775 / C2D. I also have a couple of low-end AGP cards and also
two PCI (not 'e') GeForce 2 / 32MB cards. I'm trying to sort out
which systems would benefit from the PCI cards. Obviously I don't
want to put one in a system that has equal or better integrated
graphics. I was just wondering, dows anyone know of a simple graphics
benchmark
utility that I could use to find out which systems would benefit? I
have various '3DMark' programmes but they're all large and, for my
porpoises, overly-complex. Also, as I intend to sell these systems
as simple 'internet / email' machines I'd rather not install a huge
programme that takes 15 minutes to run, then uninstall it. Orphaned
.dlls and all that.... So, the question: Can anyone recommend a small,
simple and fast
graphics benchmark that would suit my purposes? All machines will be
running XP. The ultimate app for me would be a 'portable' graphics
benchmark tool that doesn't have to be installed, that could be run
from a USB stick. TIA, and happy new year. :-)


To solve this one you don't even really need to benchmark it; the
performance of most Intel integrated graphics chipsets is well known
versus an old stanby like the GF2.

For example; on the P3, I'd bet you have like an i815 or similar type
chipset. That's only about as powerful as an original RivaTNT; so
stick the GF2 in without a doubt (even if it is PCI). Plus it'll
have faster VESA modes anyway.

For the C2D; you might be dealing with the X3100 or something; and
that's a more capable chip that's "almost" DX9 level and still beats
the GF2 in capabilities. Not to mention that you might only have one
or two PCI slots in that board to begin with.

Otherwise the old standby for that generation of graphics cards was
without a doubt 3dMark 2001. It scaled well for CPU speeds, so it was
useful even years later to compare total system performance.


Thanks deimos, I appreciate your reply.

Cheers,
--
Shaun.

"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a
monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also
into you." Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche


  #6  
Old January 3rd 11, 02:34 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
~misfit~[_15_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Q&D graphics benchmark?

Somewhere on teh intarwebs Paul wrote:
~misfit~ wrote:
Hi folks.

I've decided that I *really* have to sort out my collection of
crap... errrr.... my computers and parts. Therefore I'm building as
many machines as I can from my spares collection and taking the rest
of the hardware off to be recycled.

I have a couple of 'integrated' motherboards ranging from PIII to
Skt 775 / C2D. I also have a couple of low-end AGP cards and also
two PCI (not 'e') GeForce 2 / 32MB cards. I'm trying to sort out
which systems would benefit from the PCI cards. Obviously I don't
want to put one in a system that has equal or better integrated
graphics. I was just wondering, dows anyone know of a simple graphics
benchmark
utility that I could use to find out which systems would benefit? I
have various '3DMark' programmes but they're all large and, for my
porpoises, overly-complex. Also, as I intend to sell these systems
as simple 'internet / email' machines I'd rather not install a huge
programme that takes 15 minutes to run, then uninstall it. Orphaned
.dlls and all that.... So, the question: Can anyone recommend a small,
simple and fast
graphics benchmark that would suit my purposes? All machines will be
running XP. The ultimate app for me would be a 'portable' graphics
benchmark tool that doesn't have to be installed, that could be run
from a USB stick. TIA, and happy new year. :-)


3DMark2001SE is 40MB, and the benchmark run is as simple
as a single click. And the results, make old hardware
look good :-)

http://majorgeeks.com/3Dmark_d99.html

PAul


Thanks Paul, I'll add it to my 'always in the pocket' USB stick. It's a
shame it's not 'portable' but I guess you can't have everything. ;-)

BTW, I hope that 2011 is good to you. I for one apreciate all of the good
work that you do in the hardware groups, thanks again.
--
Shaun.

"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a
monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also
into you." Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche


  #7  
Old January 3rd 11, 02:36 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
~misfit~[_15_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 67
Default Q&D graphics benchmark?

Somewhere on teh intarwebs Foke wrote:
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:20:11 +1300, "~misfit~"
wrote:

Hi folks.


snip

So you post a request for help, then log in a few hours later and
start slamming posters with snide comments? Let me be the first to
cordially invite you to **** right off.


Thanks for your reply.
--
Shaun.

"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a
monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also
into you." Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Q&A with AMD’s Rick Bergman on the graphics sweet spot NV55 Nvidia Videocards 0 November 30th 08 10:35 AM
Looking for Motherboard (Core 2 Ready, SATA-II RAID-5 & Graphics) Steve Baker General 7 September 1st 06 06:43 PM
Graphics card & LCD monitor died together... [email protected] General 2 July 23rd 06 09:15 PM
Minimum res & graphics for CAD Nicholas Andrade Dell Computers 0 February 16th 06 05:01 PM
P3B-F & New AGP Graphics Card? Steven Hilgendorf Asus Motherboards 7 November 3rd 05 04:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2022 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.