|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
August 4th 07, 10:43 PM
posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
|
|||
|
|||
162.18 and STALKER
The Beta version was fine taking stalker into three figure frame rates, so I
though I'll try the WHQL version, wham! 3fps. It doesn't seem to affect other games in the same way. GTR2 for instance seems ok. Anyone else with problems. Andi. Intel C2D X6800, Asus Striker Extreme, 2GB OCZ SLI memory, twin 250GB SATA RAID 1 disk set, twin EVGA 8800 GTX KO video cards, X-Fi extreme gamer, Samsung 226BW 22" TFT, 850W Etasis ET850 SLi PSU. Logitech Z-5450 speakers, Logitech G25 Wheel with ECCI pedals, Win XP Pro. VPP RRP. 
|
|
#2
August 5th 07, 12:29 AM
posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
|
|||
|
|||
|
162.18 and STALKER
In article , Andi Cole says...
The Beta version was fine taking stalker into three figure frame rates, so I though I'll try the WHQL version, wham! 3fps. It doesn't seem to affect other games in the same way. GTR2 for instance seems ok. NEw version out, 163.11 -- Conor How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself?
|
|
#3
August 5th 07, 01:58 AM
posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
|
|||
|
|||
|
162.18 and STALKER
NEw version out, 163.11
Only for vista. New August DirectX version out for everyone too (see guru3d.com). rms
|
|
#4
August 5th 07, 02:36 AM
posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
|
|||
|
|||
|
162.18 and STALKER
Conor wrote:
In article , Andi Cole says... The Beta version was fine taking stalker into three figure frame rates, so I though I'll try the WHQL version, wham! 3fps. It doesn't seem to affect other games in the same way. GTR2 for instance seems ok. NEw version out, 163.11 He's using XP pro, Forceware 163.11 is Vista only! He needs to go back to the BETA 162.18. I agree, the WHQL version is borky somehow. I'm not sure how. It is intermittent. Zero issues with 162.18b!
|
|
#5
August 6th 07, 11:20 AM
posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
|
|||
|
|||
|
162.18 and STALKER
"Mr.E Solved!" wrote in message . .. Conor wrote: In article , Andi Cole says... The Beta version was fine taking stalker into three figure frame rates, so I though I'll try the WHQL version, wham! 3fps. It doesn't seem to affect other games in the same way. GTR2 for instance seems ok. NEw version out, 163.11 He's using XP pro, Forceware 163.11 is Vista only! He needs to go back to the BETA 162.18. I agree, the WHQL version is borky somehow. I'm not sure how. It is intermittent. Zero issues with 162.18b! Yes, that's what I've done and all seems fine again, stalker is peaking at well over 100fps, bring on Crysis, Doh! that means Vista, possibly ;-) Thanks for the replies. Andi.
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| STALKER: New Nvidia Driver 158.27 Gives Nice Speedup: +10% on my 7900GTX | rms[_2_] | Nvidia Videocards | 1 | June 2nd 07 09:26 PM |
| Benchmakrs for Stalker Oblivion Lost | John | Ati Videocards | 5 | January 15th 04 02:54 PM |
| Benchmakrs for Stalker Oblivion Lost | John | Nvidia Videocards | 5 | January 15th 04 02:54 PM |
Linear Mode
