|
Steven Kinch wrote in
: Name me one O/S where all hardware works 100% and I will buy it :) That would probably be Mandrake 10. No need to buy. Just download. I'm running Mandrake 10 64bit RC1. I downloaded the ISOs so it cost only three blank CDs. It installed all my hardware except I had to manually install my Canon S900 Photo printer, there was no driver so I chose the S800, set resolution to 800x800 and everything works fine. I also had to manually configure my Microtek scanner, Mandrake had drivers for an almost identical model and it also works fine. No other hardware required any tweaking except screen resolution and that was easy once I found out how to do it. Install time was less than 1/2 of the time to install XP32bit or XP64bit or Longhorn whoknowswhatbit, none of which could install the Canon Photoprinter, Microtek scanner OR my NIC, sound card or chipset drivers. It seems to me that Mandrake comes out ahead of Windows in installing hardware. I also tried SuSE and RedHat (actually Fedora project) 64 bit editions, neither of which installed hardware nearly as well as Mandrake so if you have hardware install problems, just try another disto.... |
"XS11E" wrote in message ... Steven Kinch wrote in : Name me one O/S where all hardware works 100% and I will buy it :) That would probably be Mandrake 10. No need to buy. Just download. I'm running Mandrake 10 64bit RC1. I downloaded the ISOs so it cost only three blank CDs. It installed all my hardware except I had to manually install my Canon S900 Photo printer, there was no driver so I chose the S800, set resolution to 800x800 and everything works fine. I also had to manually configure my Microtek scanner, Mandrake had drivers for an almost identical model and it also works fine. No other hardware required any tweaking except screen resolution and that was easy once I found out how to do it. Install time was less than 1/2 of the time to install XP32bit or XP64bit or Longhorn whoknowswhatbit, none of which could install the Canon Photoprinter, Microtek scanner OR my NIC, sound card or chipset drivers. It seems to me that Mandrake comes out ahead of Windows in installing hardware. I also tried SuSE and RedHat (actually Fedora project) 64 bit editions, neither of which installed hardware nearly as well as Mandrake so if you have hardware install problems, just try another disto.... The only problems I have with Mandrake 10 64bit for the AMD, is that is only out for the Silver members. Plus, there is no support for it even then. Mandrake is the best distro of Linux, but it doesn't take the place of Windows for an ATI 9600XT or X800 online gaming system. There are so many games written for the Windows Platform, and very few have been ported to Linux. And until Linux becomes completely point and click, it is not a viable OS for the masses. |
"Pseudo Namen" wrote in
: The only problems I have with Mandrake 10 64bit for the AMD, is that is only out for the Silver members. Plus, there is no support for it even then. I'm not a member of the club but the RC1 version is available to everyone and it works. Mandrake is the best distro of Linux, but it doesn't take the place of Windows for an ATI 9600XT or X800 online gaming system. I know nothing about gaming. |
"XS11E" wrote in message ... "Pseudo Namen" wrote in : The only problems I have with Mandrake 10 64bit for the AMD, is that is only out for the Silver members. Plus, there is no support for it even then. I'm not a member of the club but the RC1 version is available to everyone and it works. Mandrake is the best distro of Linux, but it doesn't take the place of Windows for an ATI 9600XT or X800 online gaming system. I know nothing about gaming. I have Mandrake version 10 RC1, but I want the final release (you have to be a silver member or greater to get that. I am a standard member. :o) Gaming is so fun. I love Warcraft 3, Diblo 2, Deus Ex, The Sims, Simcity 4, C&C Generals, etc.... The list is very large. :o) |
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 23:06:38 -0500, Pseudo Namen wrote:
And until Linux becomes completely point and click, it is not a viable OS for the masses. It's been a viable os for the masses for a few years now. First of the masses don't have to install the OS. It comes preinstalled and completely functionable. make all the people that buy pc's install windows and you'll find that not many of the masses will be able to install it either. My brother (one of the masses) has been using win for at least 12 years, and couldn't reinstall win on his machine just the other day. But I'll bet he could of gotten Linux installed (given the CD's) and he's never even used it. -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 06:05:22 +0000, Wes Newell wrote:
On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 23:06:38 -0500, Pseudo Namen wrote: And until Linux becomes completely point and click, it is not a viable OS for the masses. It's been a viable os for the masses for a few years now. First of the masses don't have to install the OS. It comes preinstalled and completely functionable. make all the people that buy pc's install windows and you'll find that not many of the masses will be able to install it either. My brother (one of the masses) has been using win for at least 12 years, and couldn't reinstall win on his machine just the other day. But I'll bet he could of gotten Linux installed (given the CD's) and he's never even used it. I just found this in the next NG.:-) I just build a new PC, everything is blank right now. After I use a Win98 bootdisk to get into DOS, then put my WinXP CD into CD-ROM when I start to run setup.exe from the WinXP CD it says:"This program can only run in Windows environment" How do you install WinXP onto a blank PC? ps: I remember with Win2000, its CD offers an utility to create 4 floppy disks These disks can run from DOS environment. I rest my case.:-) -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
A very good point, and very true. Even if they can get windows installed they cannot get the drivers working correctly. I have a friend highly ****ed because he could not get more than 256 colors, and he brought the driver CD! Whatever. I told him he could download the drivers from the net, and he said "I don't know how to do that". Since he lives 800 miles away, I could not help him out, but he got the local tech at his workplace to finish the install. This is only one example but the list is very long. The point is clear it is about per-install vs. self install. I can remember when windows 98 came out the recommendation at the time was don't install it but buy a computer with it already installed. Whatever. "Wes" == Wes Newell writes: Wes On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 23:06:38 -0500, Pseudo Namen wrote: And until Linux becomes completely point and click, it is not a viable OS for the masses. Wes It's been a viable os for the masses for a few years now. First Wes of the masses don't have to install the OS. It comes Wes preinstalled and completely functionable. make all the people Wes that buy pc's install windows and you'll find that not many of Wes the masses will be able to install it either. My brother (one of Wes the masses) has been using win for at least 12 years, and Wes couldn't reinstall win on his machine just the other day. But Wes I'll bet he could of gotten Linux installed (given the CD's) and Wes he's never even used it. Wes -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) Wes http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
"Wes" == Wes Newell writes:
Wes On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 06:05:22 +0000, Wes Newell wrote: On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 23:06:38 -0500, Pseudo Namen wrote: And until Linux becomes completely point and click, it is not a viable OS for the masses. It's been a viable os for the masses for a few years now. First of the masses don't have to install the OS. It comes preinstalled and completely functionable. make all the people that buy pc's install windows and you'll find that not many of the masses will be able to install it either. My brother (one of the masses) has been using win for at least 12 years, and couldn't reinstall win on his machine just the other day. But I'll bet he could of gotten Linux installed (given the CD's) and he's never even used it. Wes I just found this in the next NG.:-) Wes I just build a new PC, everything is blank right now. After I Wes use a Win98 bootdisk to get into DOS, then put my WinXP CD into Wes CD-ROM when I start to run setup.exe from the WinXP CD it Wes says:"This program can only run in Windows environment" How do Wes you install WinXP onto a blank PC? Wes ps: I remember with Win2000, its CD offers an utility to create Wes 4 floppy disks These disks can run from DOS environment. Wes I rest my case.:-) Wes -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) Wes http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm You can download the program from M$ web site that will make the XP install disks. I think it is six disks total. This is painful but it works. Besides cutting the grass this is the only time my 19 year son is useful. ;-) Your point is very clear few folks have a clue, and actually the XP cd should boot on most newer computers, but it may not. I would never use Windows, but my job requires Windows 2000. I was ordered by the management that I could not even connect to the network with my Linux laptop. Apparently they have some type of network software that can detect Linux computers and the tech will physically disconnect your computer from the network. Then you will get a very nasty e-mail or memo from the IT folks. Whatever again. Found out the other day one of the techs at work was running Linux without the adminstrations permission. Whatever |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:03 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HardwareBanter.com