If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
When will the first "10 GHz" cpu be made available to the end user?
Everyone take a gamble!
I say in 2007 January. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Next Tuesday.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Susan Sontag in Hell" wrote in message news:xQvHd.18967$B95.12734@lakeread02... | Next Tuesday. | That's cool! Could you tell me where I can get this AMD 10GHz processor? Also tell me which motherbaords would be the best! ; ) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 16:14:25 +0000, TripleEight wrote:
Everyone take a gamble! I say in 2007 January. I'l say 2010, but I really think it'll be a lot longer than that. Wonder why both amd an iintel are working on dual core cpu's.:-) -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
TripleEight wrote:
Everyone take a gamble! I say in 2007 January. I say never. There's little to no point at all ramping frequency up. The future is multiple core on chip and tricks like that. Look at AMD. It's 2 years they work at 2GHz with different cpus. But AMD64 is way faster than K7, even if their frequency is the same. Remember: 10GHZ means the light will travel for 3cm, slightly more than 1". So you need several clock cycles before the signal moves on from the cpu to main memory. Your cpu will sit idle waiting for data. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Ed Koan" wrote in message ... | TripleEight wrote: | Everyone take a gamble! | | I say in 2007 January. | | I say never. There's little to no point at all ramping frequency up. | The future is multiple core on chip and tricks like that. | Look at AMD. It's 2 years they work at 2GHz with different cpus. But | AMD64 is way faster than K7, even if their frequency is the same. | | Remember: 10GHZ means the light will travel for 3cm, slightly more than | 1". So you need several clock cycles before the signal moves on from the | cpu to main memory. Your cpu will sit idle waiting for data. This leads lead to another question. Will there ever be a limit? I always had thought there would! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
TripleEight wrote:
"Ed Koan" wrote in message ... | TripleEight wrote: | Everyone take a gamble! | | I say in 2007 January. | | I say never. There's little to no point at all ramping frequency up. | The future is multiple core on chip and tricks like that. | Look at AMD. It's 2 years they work at 2GHz with different cpus. But | AMD64 is way faster than K7, even if their frequency is the same. | | Remember: 10GHZ means the light will travel for 3cm, slightly more than | 1". So you need several clock cycles before the signal moves on from the | cpu to main memory. Your cpu will sit idle waiting for data. This leads lead to another question. Will there ever be a limit? I always had thought there would! Well, you have some limits. Speed of light, for instance. Or limits due to Heisenberg's principle. Or even better in this case, size of an atom. The latter means you won't be able to create a circuit smaller than an atom (forget quantum computing, which is nice for writing SF stories). But if you start thinking just about the current situation, the bottleneck isn't cpu anymore. It's the I/O, i.e memory access. In real life DDR400 is not almost twice as fast as DDR266, say. What next? I don't know. But I doubt the speed of the *whole* pc will double every 18 months in the near future. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"TripleEight" wrote in
: Everyone take a gamble! I say in 2007 January. Correct. And it will be a 1361-bit processor. Your video card will be the size of a small RV and will require a dedicated 3 phase power input. Hard drives will be solid state holographic crystal devices and we will drive flying cars. Oh, and Generalissimo Francisco Franco will still be dead. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"TripleEight" wrote in message
... Everyone take a gamble! I say in 2007 January. Quantum Computers are the wave of the future http://www.qubit.org/library/intros/comp/comp.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FBI SADISTS should be HUNTED, KIDNAPPED and TORTURED for 3 YRS | Keith | General | 2 | November 23rd 04 07:32 AM |
I guess that prediction made at one site was right the AMD 64 socket 939s are close to what the 754s were , now | kony | General | 1 | September 26th 04 07:57 AM |
I guess that prediction made at one site was right the AMD 64 socket939s are close to what the 754s were , now | JK | General | 0 | September 26th 04 07:24 AM |
I guess that prediction made at one site was right the AMD 64 | S.Heenan | General | 0 | September 26th 04 06:47 AM |
CompGeeks in the US has the Amptron (made by Biostar M7NCD nForce2 400 Socket A MB w/Sound, LAN $38 new | [email protected] | General | 0 | June 29th 04 07:39 AM |