If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
AMD 64 3000 939
Hey group.
I have come across a site selling 939 pin 64 3000 and 3200. I have contacted the site as i didnt know they were avaliable and as i want a new MB, and want a 939 socket one it looks like a good value option. They have confirmed them. Anyone know any details on the chips - as the AMD site doesnt list them. Cheers - Alex PS...site is www.lowestonweb.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Alex wrote:
Hey group. I have come across a site selling 939 pin 64 3000 and 3200. I have contacted the site as i didnt know they were avaliable and as i want a new MB, and want a 939 socket one it looks like a good value option. They have confirmed them. Anyone know any details on the chips - as the AMD site doesnt list them. Cheers - Alex PS...site is www.lowestonweb.com The 939 pin Athlon 64 3000+ and 3200+ are the new 90nm CPUs that just came available this month. If you want to read one review, here's the URL for AMD Zone's review: http://www.amdzone.net/modules.php?o...rtid=63&page=1 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 14:53:51 -0400, Dee wrote:
Alex wrote: Hey group. I have come across a site selling 939 pin 64 3000 and 3200. I have contacted the site as i didnt know they were avaliable and as i want a new MB, and want a 939 socket one it looks like a good value option. They have confirmed them. Anyone know any details on the chips - as the AMD site doesnt list them. Cheers - Alex PS...site is www.lowestonweb.com The 939 pin Athlon 64 3000+ and 3200+ are the new 90nm CPUs that just came available this month. If you want to read one review, here's the URL for AMD Zone's review: http://www.amdzone.net/modules.php?o...rtid=63&page=1 There is a pretty small price difference between the 3000+ and the 3200+ so you might as well get the 3200+. Also wait 2 weeks, AMD has a price cut coming next week. As for motherboards, the review sites like the MSI K8N NEO2 Platinum. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 19:45:24 +0100, "Alex" wrote:
Hey group. I have come across a site selling 939 pin 64 3000 and 3200. I have contacted the site as i didnt know they were avaliable and as i want a new MB, and want a 939 socket one it looks like a good value option. They have confirmed them. Anyone know any details on the chips - as the AMD site doesnt list them. Cheers - Alex PS...site is www.lowestonweb.com Is it still the popular opinion that socket 939 is magical and desirable over the pathetic and diseased socket 754 ? LOL. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Alex" wrote in
: Hey group. I have come across a site selling 939 pin 64 3000 and 3200. I have contacted the site as i didnt know they were avaliable and as i want a new MB, and want a 939 socket one it looks like a good value option. They have confirmed them. Anyone know any details on the chips - as the AMD site doesnt list them. Try: http://www.amd.com/us- en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_9485_9487%5E10248,00.html |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
born_yesterday wrote in message
... " Is it still the popular opinion that socket 939 is magical and desirable over the pathetic and diseased socket 754? " That looks to be very much the case. Socket 939 currently offers a longer CPU roadmap and dual-channel performance. The 939 3000+ will shed the 'too expensive' tag, and the near future will bring Nforce4, PCI-E, SLI and DDR-II. Socket 754 may not get Nforce4, PCI-E, SLI and DDR-II. If AMD want it as the main Sempron platform (as previously predicted), they will pressure their partners and run their marketing strategy to keep socket 939 ahead. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 16:04:57 +0100, Cuzman wrote:
born_yesterday wrote in message ... " Is it still the popular opinion that socket 939 is magical and desirable over the pathetic and diseased socket 754? " That looks to be very much the case. Socket 939 currently offers a longer CPU roadmap and dual-channel performance. The 939 3000+ will shed the 'too expensive' tag, and the near future will bring Nforce4, PCI-E, SLI and DDR-II. Socket 754 may not get Nforce4, PCI-E, SLI and DDR-II. If AMD want it as the main Sempron platform (as previously predicted), they will pressure their partners and run their marketing strategy to keep socket 939 ahead. I think what he was trying to point out is that the A64 3000+ on a socket 754 board beats the A64 3000+ 939 in every test by a good margin (except memory benchmarks). So 939 doesn't really offer anything in performance boost over the pathetic 754 as he would put it.:-) -- Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB) http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
born_yesterday wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 19:45:24 +0100, "Alex" wrote: Hey group. I have come across a site selling 939 pin 64 3000 and 3200. I have contacted the site as i didnt know they were avaliable and as i want a new MB, and want a 939 socket one it looks like a good value option. They have confirmed them. Anyone know any details on the chips - as the AMD site doesnt list them. Cheers - Alex PS...site is www.lowestonweb.com Is it still the popular opinion that socket 939 is magical and desirable over the pathetic and diseased socket 754 ? LOL. Based on you asinine response, you must have been the afterbirth that came out of your mother's anus, which wasn't even the right path!! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I think what he was trying to point out is that the A64 3000+ on a socket
754 board beats the A64 3000+ 939 in every test by a good margin (except memory benchmarks). So 939 doesn't really offer anything in performance boost over the pathetic 754 as he would put it.:-) Probably because the S754 3000+ runs at 2.0GHz, while the S939 3000+ runs at 1.8GHz. I'll bet a S754 3000+ would match a S939 3200+ in single channel mode and be slightly outperformed by it in dual channel mode (but probably not by a large enough factor to get excited about). Still, if I were building an A64 box in the near future, I'd probably go with a S939 since it has a better upgrade path. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Lachoneus wrote: I think what he was trying to point out is that the A64 3000+ on a socket 754 board beats the A64 3000+ 939 in every test by a good margin (except memory benchmarks). So 939 doesn't really offer anything in performance boost over the pathetic 754 as he would put it.:-) Probably because the S754 3000+ runs at 2.0GHz, while the S939 3000+ runs at 1.8GHz. I'll bet a S754 3000+ would match a S939 3200+ in single channel mode and be slightly outperformed by it in dual channel mode (but probably not by a large enough factor to get excited about). Still, if I were building an A64 box in the near future, I'd probably go with a S939 since it has a better upgrade path. I would choose the socket 754 one, since the socket 939 one is around $50 more, and a socket 939 motherboard is around $30 more than a socket 754 one. The $80 saved would probably pay for a new motherboard when you are ready to upgrade the cpu, and motherboards available then will probably be much better performing than those available now. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Asus A733 & XP 3000 - BIOS settings... | John Hellingsworth | General | 4 | September 18th 04 10:22 PM |
XP 2500 to XP 3000 - Heatsink and Fan upgrade? | John Hellingsworth | General | 2 | May 10th 04 04:10 AM |
xp 2800 or 3000 | jay | Overclocking AMD Processors | 0 | February 29th 04 04:44 PM |
A7V333 with Athlon 3000 XP | MarkW | General | 8 | January 3rd 04 09:32 PM |
AMD Athlon 3000 / 400 Mhz FSB | Bajji | Overclocking AMD Processors | 0 | October 1st 03 03:24 PM |