A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » AMD x86-64 Processors
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

First 64-bit AMD64 Windows virus emerges



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 25th 04, 11:42 PM
Yousuf Khan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default First 64-bit AMD64 Windows virus emerges

http://www.eet.com/semi/news/showArt...cleId=30900082

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18085

--
Humans: contact me at ykhan at rogers dot com
Spambots: just reply to this email address ;-)


  #2  
Old August 26th 04, 01:33 AM
Wes Newell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:42:07 +0000, Yousuf Khan wrote:

http://www.eet.com/semi/news/showArt...cleId=30900082

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18085


Just another reason I don't use Windows.;-)

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm
  #3  
Old August 26th 04, 01:50 AM
Carlo Razzeto
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Yousuf Khan" wrote in message
able.rogers.com...
http://www.eet.com/semi/news/showArt...cleId=30900082

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18085

--
Humans: contact me at ykhan at rogers dot com
Spambots: just reply to this email address ;-)



quote
The wire quotes Symantec as saying the proof of concept virus exists just to
show that iAMD64 machines are as vulnerable as any other computer platform.
/quote

Well duh, DEP isn't the virus cure all. It just helps protect you against
certain kinds of buffer attacks...

Carlo


  #4  
Old August 26th 04, 03:04 PM
Jamco
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

does that make you feel special?
thanks for sharing, idiot

"Wes Newell" wrote in message
news[email protected] .net...
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:42:07 +0000, Yousuf Khan wrote:

http://www.eet.com/semi/news/showArt...cleId=30900082

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18085


Just another reason I don't use Windows.;-)

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm



  #5  
Old August 26th 04, 06:18 PM
Wes Newell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:04:44 +0000, Jamco wrote:

"Wes Newell" wrote in message
news[email protected] .net...
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:42:07 +0000, Yousuf Khan wrote:

http://www.eet.com/semi/news/showArt...cleId=30900082

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18085


Just another reason I don't use Windows.;-)

does that make you feel special?
thanks for sharing, idiot

Fixed morons top post and failure to remove old sig line.. Now to the
point...

Get ****ed you stupid SOB. And that Son of a Bitch in case you can't
inderstand it you ****ing asshole.

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm
  #6  
Old August 26th 04, 06:42 PM
chrisv
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jamco" top posted:

does that make you feel special?
thanks for sharing, idiot


Said the stupid top poster.

  #7  
Old August 29th 04, 08:21 PM
flossie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jamco" wrote in message
news:[email protected]
does that make you feel special?
thanks for sharing, idiot

"Wes Newell" wrote in message
news[email protected] .net...
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:42:07 +0000, Yousuf Khan wrote:

http://www.eet.com/semi/news/showArt...cleId=30900082

http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=18085


Just another reason I don't use Windows.;-)

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm





Well that post that Wes Newell has done what you can`t do or understand. It
has informed people that even the AMD64 Cpu`s are not infallible when it
comes to virus`s and trojans.

I found the links very informative as i am sure other people have done also.
He has helped people to accertain what the information is about Virii and
the AMD64 platform.

What have you done but inform everyone what a plonker you are by top posting
and telling the poster in no incertain words that he is a idiot for doing
it.


  #8  
Old August 30th 04, 04:25 AM
Tony Hill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:21:10 +0000 (UTC), "flossie"
wrote:

Well that post that Wes Newell has done what you can`t do or understand. It
has informed people that even the AMD64 Cpu`s are not infallible when it
comes to virus`s and trojans.

I found the links very informative as i am sure other people have done also.
He has helped people to accertain what the information is about Virii and
the AMD64 platform.


I don't think that anyone who know what was going on here ever doubted
that the AMD64 platform was still very much vulnerable to viruses.
However AMD's marketing department definitely needs this sort of
smacking upside the head for the sheer audacity of them calling their
no-execute bit "Virus protection" in the first place. That was a flat
out lie and it's good that they are being called on it.

That being said, it is a much needed feature that should have been
implemented ages ago (and implemented properly like AMD has done, not
the odd-ball segment protection scheme that Intel designed and
absolutely nobody used). It will help protect systems from certain
buffer overruns and remote exploits which, IMO, are a MUCH more
serious cause for concern than viruses. Viruses are *EXTREMELY* easy
to avoid if you know anything about how they work, but remotely
exploitable flaws in code are WAY more difficult to avoid (basically
impossible to avoid when the exploit is previously unknown and in some
server code that you need to be accessible from the internet).

-------------
Tony Hill
hilla underscore 20 at yahoo dot ca
  #9  
Old August 30th 04, 06:05 AM
Hellmark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Never anonymous Bud's last words before the Sword of Azrial plunged
through his body we
Viruses target OPERATING SYSTEMS and programs, not CPUs.


No, but this was tailored to run only on AMD64's
  #10  
Old August 30th 04, 10:14 AM
Wes Newell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 05:05:12 +0000, Hellmark wrote:

Never anonymous Bud's last words before the Sword of Azrial plunged
through his body we
Viruses target OPERATING SYSTEMS and programs, not CPUs.


No, but this was tailored to run only on AMD64's


And what other CPU's currently run the AMD 64bit codes? :-)

--
Abit KT7-Raid (KT133) Tbred B core CPU @2400MHz (24x100FSB)
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Will Windows Power the Living Room? Ablang General 31 July 8th 04 05:34 AM
Freedom: Coming to a Windows Box Near You Ablang General 0 June 30th 04 03:04 AM
Valid Points 101: 2x P4 Xeons + Hyperthreading + Windows XP Professional / W2K / NT4 / *Nix (long post!) Duncan, Eric A. General 7 February 3rd 04 06:06 PM
Virus or not? Kolin Tregaskes General 2 December 6th 03 10:51 PM
Does Windows kill the "bootability" other secondary hard drives it finds with the same OS on? Kb General 3 September 5th 03 12:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.