A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Nvidia Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Advice - to upgrade or not



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 20th 04, 10:34 PM
--Jerry--
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Advice - to upgrade or not

If you have any GF4 card you do not need to upgrade your graphic card for
next 3-6 months and then a new GPU must appear. All games are running OK on
full GF4 cards (NOT MX!!!). I tested Radeon R9700 and FX 5900 and I did not
notice any improvement in speed in any applications. All that was present
was a DX 9 support and I could see that only in benchmarks like 3D Mark etc.
Drivers are so well opimised for GF4 cards that I was surprised that FX and
Radeon cards do not bring any noticable acceleration exept in tests. That is
valid for any GF 4 card (Ti 4200, 4400, 4600 and 4800SE). Any MX card is
slow and it is worth to upgrade.
And one thing - ATI drivers sucks. ATI cards are so fast, picture is so
sharp, colours are so vivid but drivers... They are not so bad in Windows
but in games are horrible. Flashing shadows, missing textures, missing
distant objects etc. So if you are using Nvidia based card you are going to
be very dissapointed if you upgrade to ATI card (no, I am not working in
Nvidia marketing departement) and that is a fact that prevent me from
keeping ATI R9700 card in my PC. Look how often new ATI drivers appear. All
users that are using ATI cards admitt that there are some problems with
drivers. Some of them never used Nvidia cards and they do not know how
important good drivers are.
So for now I am still using my Ti4800SE and am waiting for new card from
Nvidia.


  #2  
Old January 20th 04, 10:58 PM
Andrew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 23:34:21 +0100, "--Jerry--"
spread this FUD:

If you have any GF4 card you do not need to upgrade your graphic card for
next 3-6 months and then a new GPU must appear. All games are running OK on
full GF4 cards (NOT MX!!!). I tested Radeon R9700 and FX 5900 and I did not
notice any improvement in speed in any applications.


Try enabling FSAA and see if you make the same statement.

And one thing - ATI drivers sucks.


Thats not my experience with the 3.7 Catalysts.

Look how often new ATI drivers appear.


And how often do NVidia drivers appear? At least as frequently if not
more.

All users that are using ATI cards admitt that there are some problems with
drivers.


As I said, 3.7 is great for me.

Some of them never used Nvidia cards and they do not know how
important good drivers are.


I used GF1,2,3&4 series cards and went through dozens of "good"
drivers.

So for now I am still using my Ti4800SE and am waiting for new card from
Nvidia.


Thats fine, thats your choice, but that doesn't mean you have to
spread BS about ATI cards and drivers.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
  #3  
Old January 20th 04, 11:08 PM
--Jerry--
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Try enabling FSAA and see if you make the same statement.
And ATI R9x00 and FX cards are too slow for DX 9 applications too.

And one thing - ATI drivers sucks.


Thats not my experience with the 3.7 Catalysts.

Or worst with 3.9 Catalyst.


Look how often new ATI drivers appear.


And how often do NVidia drivers appear? At least as frequently if not
more.

Yes, but new drivers are out often to bring more speed and not so many
bugfixes as Catalyst.


All users that are using ATI cards admitt that there are some problems

with
drivers.


As I said, 3.7 is great for me.

Depends what games and applications are you using.


Some of them never used Nvidia cards and they do not know how
important good drivers are.


I used GF1,2,3&4 series cards and went through dozens of "good"
drivers.


Again, that depends what games and applications are you using. Nvidia
drivers do not have so many bugs.


So for now I am still using my Ti4800SE and am waiting for new card from
Nvidia.


Thats fine, thats your choice, but that doesn't mean you have to
spread BS about ATI cards and drivers.

This group is for Nvidia users and there is many questions about upgrades.
My post us there to give them a clue and not to spread BS about ATI. As I
mentioned, ATI is faster and better than Nvidia but drivers are different
story.


  #4  
Old January 20th 04, 11:14 PM
Andrew
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 21 Jan 2004 00:08:29 +0100, "--Jerry--"
wrote:

This group is for Nvidia users and there is many questions about upgrades.
My post us there to give them a clue and not to spread BS about ATI. As I
mentioned, ATI is faster and better than Nvidia but drivers are different
story.


Well try getting a clue yourself first before trying to educate
others.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevent text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.
  #5  
Old January 21st 04, 04:55 AM
J. Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

--Jerry-- wrote:

Try enabling FSAA and see if you make the same statement.

And ATI R9x00 and FX cards are too slow for DX 9 applications too.

And one thing - ATI drivers sucks.


Thats not my experience with the 3.7 Catalysts.

Or worst with 3.9 Catalyst.


Look how often new ATI drivers appear.


And how often do NVidia drivers appear? At least as frequently if not
more.

Yes, but new drivers are out often to bring more speed and not so many
bugfixes as Catalyst.


Geez, the reason they bring out new drivers so often is that they used to
get criticized for not bringing out new drivers often enough. As for bugs
vs speed, the nvidia driver updates don't give more speed, they cheat
better on benchmarks.

All users that are using ATI cards admitt that there are some problems

with
drivers.


As I said, 3.7 is great for me.

Depends what games and applications are you using.


Same is true of nvidia.

Some of them never used Nvidia cards and they do not know how
important good drivers are.


I used GF1,2,3&4 series cards and went through dozens of "good"
drivers.


Again, that depends what games and applications are you using. Nvidia
drivers do not have so many bugs.


Except when they do.

So for now I am still using my Ti4800SE and am waiting for new card from
Nvidia.


Thats fine, thats your choice, but that doesn't mean you have to
spread BS about ATI cards and drivers.

This group is for Nvidia users and there is many questions about upgrades.
My post us there to give them a clue and not to spread BS about ATI. As I
mentioned, ATI is faster and better than Nvidia but drivers are different
story.


Plenty of complaints about the nvidia drivers here. Making a perfect driver
to work with an OS as complex as Windows and a chip as complex as current
video boards are takes time.

--
--John
Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
  #6  
Old January 21st 04, 07:42 AM
Darthy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 20 Jan 2004 23:34:21 +0100, "--Jerry--"
wrote:

If you have any GF4 card you do not need to upgrade your graphic card for
next 3-6 months and then a new GPU must appear. All games are running OK on
full GF4 cards (NOT MX!!!). I tested Radeon R9700 and FX 5900 and I did not
notice any improvement in speed in any applications. All that was present


I will kind of agree on that... but a person who can't afford an
ATi9800/5900 today will tomorrow as their prices are now hitting below
$200. (ah competition)

But a 5900/9700 will smoke a Ti4x000 card anyday, try a modern game -
not Quake3, get back to us. On my same hardware, it's a noticable
difference in game play.... if you have a Celeron 2.4Ghz or old P3
system - it won't make a difference.

Drivers are so well opimised for GF4 cards that I was surprised that FX and
Radeon cards do not bring any noticable acceleration exept in tests. That is
valid for any GF 4 card (Ti 4200, 4400, 4600 and 4800SE).


Not on your machine. You don't seem to know much about 3D video....
anyone worth their grain of salt knows that a 4800se is a 4400 with a
new name and AGP-8x thrown in (results = nothing)

And one thing - ATI drivers sucks. ATI cards are so fast, picture is so
sharp, colours are so vivid but drivers... They are not so bad in Windows
but in games are horrible. Flashing shadows, missing textures, missing


What games? None of my games do that. FUD. From GLtron to UT to
UT2003 to MS TrainSimulator to HALO to COD, no problems.

keeping ATI R9700 card in my PC. Look how often new ATI drivers appear. All
users that are using ATI cards admitt that there are some problems with
drivers. Some of them never used Nvidia cards and they do not know how
important good drivers are.


Never had a problem with ATI drivers. Had problem with the last batch
of Nvidia drivers. Nvidia comes out with drivers more or less the
same as ATI. FUD

Both have issues... yes. But none are perfect.

So for now I am still using my Ti4800SE and am waiting for new card from
Nvidia.


Good for you, enjoy your Ti4400.


--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!
  #7  
Old January 21st 04, 12:41 PM
Dark Avenger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"--Jerry--" wrote in message ...
If you have any GF4 card you do not need to upgrade your graphic card for
next 3-6 months and then a new GPU must appear. All games are running OK on
full GF4 cards (NOT MX!!!). I tested Radeon R9700 and FX 5900 and I did not
notice any improvement in speed in any applications. All that was present
was a DX 9 support and I could see that only in benchmarks like 3D Mark etc.
Drivers are so well opimised for GF4 cards that I was surprised that FX and
Radeon cards do not bring any noticable acceleration exept in tests. That is
valid for any GF 4 card (Ti 4200, 4400, 4600 and 4800SE). Any MX card is
slow and it is worth to upgrade.
And one thing - ATI drivers sucks. ATI cards are so fast, picture is so
sharp, colours are so vivid but drivers... They are not so bad in Windows
but in games are horrible. Flashing shadows, missing textures, missing
distant objects etc. So if you are using Nvidia based card you are going to
be very dissapointed if you upgrade to ATI card (no, I am not working in
Nvidia marketing departement) and that is a fact that prevent me from
keeping ATI R9700 card in my PC. Look how often new ATI drivers appear. All
users that are using ATI cards admitt that there are some problems with
drivers. Some of them never used Nvidia cards and they do not know how
important good drivers are.
So for now I am still using my Ti4800SE and am waiting for new card from
Nvidia.


Strange... I got a nice 9500 Pro, second hand, plays games great. Yeah
I know it might be not the fastest in DX8, It has slight limitations
versus it's bigger brothers.....

But the drivers are rock stable 3.8 and up are great. I though use
omegacorner drivers!

There is not much direct improvement, what you get with the 9700 Pro
card. But indeed, FSAA works better for instance.

And yes nvidia drivers work pretty fine, and runs games but rather
show not that what has to be shown then that it simply refuses.

Every game I had I could play on my ati 9500 Pro card, the few games
that had problems had it solved with the next driver version.

I self also still got an ti4800SE and...umm..do not install the latest
forceware on them, they get unstable.

Maybe indeed pre 3.1 had nvidia definitly better driver support, but
currently nvidia is crapping in, great cards still but their drivers
are getting worse fast.

While the ati drivers only get better.... strange.

:-)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A7N8X > AN7 Upgrade Advice Minotaur Overclocking AMD Processors 4 August 20th 04 06:30 AM
Need upgrade advice please... broncosfan Ati Videocards 12 April 4th 04 07:22 PM
advice on gaming system upgrade ES General 4 January 28th 04 12:09 PM
Buying advice: - Looking to upgrade graphics card. Mike Spezzano Nvidia Videocards 7 October 1st 03 06:40 PM
Upgrade advice needed... Gary I. Asus Motherboards 0 June 23rd 03 07:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.