If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Question about Ti4200 benchmarks.
Hello! I'm a bit worried about my Gf4 Ti4200 64MB benchmarks. I'm
getting 10700, but the average is supposedly anywhere from 12000-13000 from what I've seen. I'm using 3dMark 2001SE and the following config: P4 2.8Ghz, 512MB RAM, Albatron motherboard. My motherboard, CPU, and video drivers are up to date. The problem is that I'm planning to upgrade to a high-end ATI card soon, but I'm worried that something will deter its performance as well. So the question is, what are the REAL average benchmarks? Do my benchmarks fit into that area? And is there any way I can perhaps improve performance? (my CPU currently runs at 117.5 degrees F - if that's too hot, how can I make it cooler?) Thanks in advance. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Hello! I'm a bit worried about my Gf4 Ti4200 64MB benchmarks. I'm
getting 10700, but the average is supposedly anywhere from 12000-13000 from what I've seen. I'm using 3dMark 2001SE and the following config: P4 2.8Ghz, 512MB RAM, Albatron motherboard. Hm. My XP2500+/Ti4200 scores just over 11k stock. Even still, it's not a huge difference we're talking about here. I'd just make sure there isn't a bunch of junk running in the background (media player tray icons, IM programs, and the like). From my experience, 3DMark benchmarks seem to be skewed upward by overclockers and tweakers. For all I know, the people getting high scores are using ridiculously high LOD bias settings (I set mine up to +12 using RivaTuner once--it was hilarious; nothing was textured--the matrix guy's head looked like a yellow grape wearing glasses). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Processor temp is definitely okay if you're using a stock heatsink. I would
have been lucky to get my AthlonXP to idle that cool until I got a ThermalTake Volcano for K7. I'd reccomend a different heatsink if you're worried. "archagon" wrote in message om... Hello! I'm a bit worried about my Gf4 Ti4200 64MB benchmarks. I'm getting 10700, but the average is supposedly anywhere from 12000-13000 from what I've seen. I'm using 3dMark 2001SE and the following config: P4 2.8Ghz, 512MB RAM, Albatron motherboard. My motherboard, CPU, and video drivers are up to date. The problem is that I'm planning to upgrade to a high-end ATI card soon, but I'm worried that something will deter its performance as well. So the question is, what are the REAL average benchmarks? Do my benchmarks fit into that area? And is there any way I can perhaps improve performance? (my CPU currently runs at 117.5 degrees F - if that's too hot, how can I make it cooler?) Thanks in advance. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"archagon" wrote in message
om... Hello! I'm a bit worried about my Gf4 Ti4200 64MB benchmarks. I'm getting 10700, but the average is supposedly anywhere from 12000-13000 from what I've seen. I'm using 3dMark 2001SE and the following config: P4 2.8Ghz, 512MB RAM, Albatron motherboard. My motherboard, CPU, and video drivers are up to date. The problem is that I'm planning to upgrade to a high-end ATI card soon, but I'm worried that something will deter its performance as well. best way to see what is limiting your score is to run the test at 1024x768 and note down the score then repeat the test in 640x480. if the lower resolution produces a substantially higher score then your benchmark is graphics card limited and fitting a new graphics card will improove performance. if however the score stays the same then the score/performance is limited by some other weakest link in your system. this could be ram or processor speed. if thats the case youd see more benefit from upgrading whatever was holding you back hope this helps alan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Alan" wrote in message ...
"archagon" wrote in message om... Hello! I'm a bit worried about my Gf4 Ti4200 64MB benchmarks. I'm getting 10700, but the average is supposedly anywhere from 12000-13000 from what I've seen. I'm using 3dMark 2001SE and the following config: P4 2.8Ghz, 512MB RAM, Albatron motherboard. My motherboard, CPU, and video drivers are up to date. The problem is that I'm planning to upgrade to a high-end ATI card soon, but I'm worried that something will deter its performance as well. best way to see what is limiting your score is to run the test at 1024x768 and note down the score then repeat the test in 640x480. if the lower resolution produces a substantially higher score then your benchmark is graphics card limited and fitting a new graphics card will improove performance. if however the score stays the same then the score/performance is limited by some other weakest link in your system. this could be ram or processor speed. if thats the case youd see more benefit from upgrading whatever was holding you back hope this helps alan Went from 10700 to 13443. So I'm fine then? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Yeremein wrote:
Hello! I'm a bit worried about my Gf4 Ti4200 64MB benchmarks. I'm getting 10700, but the average is supposedly anywhere from 12000-13000 from what I've seen. I'm using 3dMark 2001SE and the following config: P4 2.8Ghz, 512MB RAM, Albatron motherboard. Hm. My XP2500+/Ti4200 scores just over 11k stock. Even still, it's not a huge difference we're talking about here. I'd just make sure there isn't a bunch of junk running in the background (media player tray icons, IM programs, and the like). From my experience, 3DMark benchmarks seem to be skewed upward by overclockers and tweakers. For all I know, the people getting high scores are using ridiculously high LOD bias settings (I set mine up to +12 using RivaTuner once--it was hilarious; nothing was textured--the matrix guy's head looked like a yellow grape wearing glasses). 11,985 here. ti4200/128MB, XP1800+ O/Ced to 2.1GHz. Graphics card not O/Ced. -- ~misfit~ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Version of detonator drivers is very important.
AMD TB XP 2600+/GF4 4200 64 without overclocking 53.03 --- 10400 43.02 --- 11500 "~misfit~" escribió en el mensaje ... Yeremein wrote: Hello! I'm a bit worried about my Gf4 Ti4200 64MB benchmarks. I'm getting 10700, but the average is supposedly anywhere from 12000-13000 from what I've seen. I'm using 3dMark 2001SE and the following config: P4 2.8Ghz, 512MB RAM, Albatron motherboard. Hm. My XP2500+/Ti4200 scores just over 11k stock. Even still, it's not a huge difference we're talking about here. I'd just make sure there isn't a bunch of junk running in the background (media player tray icons, IM programs, and the like). From my experience, 3DMark benchmarks seem to be skewed upward by overclockers and tweakers. For all I know, the people getting high scores are using ridiculously high LOD bias settings (I set mine up to +12 using RivaTuner once--it was hilarious; nothing was textured--the matrix guy's head looked like a yellow grape wearing glasses). 11,985 here. ti4200/128MB, XP1800+ O/Ced to 2.1GHz. Graphics card not O/Ced. -- ~misfit~ |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Question about GF4 Ti4200 Fan | Quadriflax | Nvidia Videocards | 8 | December 23rd 03 08:42 AM |
Recommendations and request for benchmarks, Ti4200 vs R9600 | porpoise | Ati Videocards | 6 | October 27th 03 04:11 PM |
Question: Asus V9280TD 128 megs (TI4200) is it a good choice ? | Bli | Nvidia Videocards | 1 | September 19th 03 11:56 AM |
ti4200 question. | Jez IAnson | Nvidia Videocards | 7 | September 2nd 03 12:49 AM |
Chaintech Ti4200 question | Scott King | Nvidia Videocards | 5 | July 13th 03 03:26 AM |