Whoah!

Just topped the list of others with my setup.

P4 2.4C
Intel D865GBF
Asus GF3 Ti200 @ 250/550
512MB Samsung PC3200 (2x256)

I'm surprised, as Hell. Did not expect to get more than, maybe, 800-1000
3DMarks...

Just waxed 1,316 3DMarks, default settings, in 3DMark2003!

I was, totally, not expecting that.


--
Strontium

"I thought I'd lost you, somewhere. But you were, never, really ever there
at all.. And, I want to get free..."

Just ran UT2003 benchmark. Is there someplace to compare, online? Just
spent last hour searching. No luck. Results, below.

Flyby:
63.635540 / 104.014900 / 303.517578 fps -- Score = 104.023140
rand[21984]


63.171356 / 149.412369 / 396.159241 fps -- Score = 149.541687
rand[13704]


Botmatch:
20.480404 / 49.142952 / 97.354958 fps -- Score = 49.170006
rand[28639]


30.974630 / 78.494148 / 153.320496 fps -- Score = 78.538834
rand[16548]


-
Strontium stood up, at show-n-tell, and said:

Just topped the list of others with my setup.

P4 2.4C
Intel D865GBF
Asus GF3 Ti200 @ 250/550
512MB Samsung PC3200 (2x256)

I'm surprised, as Hell. Did not expect to get more than, maybe,
800-1000 3DMarks...

Just waxed 1,316 3DMarks, default settings, in 3DMark2003!

I was, totally, not expecting that.

--
Strontium

"I thought I'd lost you, somewhere. But you were, never, really ever
there at all.. And, I want to get free..."

It's amazing what an 800Mhz FSB and dual channel DDR will do for you. And,
the GF3 Ti200 really is not a bad video card, especially for the money.

Ron

"Strontium" wrote in message
...
Just ran UT2003 benchmark. Is there someplace to compare, online? Just
spent last hour searching. No luck. Results, below.

Flyby:
63.635540 / 104.014900 / 303.517578 fps -- Score = 104.023140
rand[21984]


63.171356 / 149.412369 / 396.159241 fps -- Score = 149.541687
rand[13704]


Botmatch:
20.480404 / 49.142952 / 97.354958 fps -- Score = 49.170006
rand[28639]


30.974630 / 78.494148 / 153.320496 fps -- Score = 78.538834
rand[16548]


-
Strontium stood up, at show-n-tell, and said:

Just topped the list of others with my setup.

P4 2.4C
Intel D865GBF
Asus GF3 Ti200 @ 250/550
512MB Samsung PC3200 (2x256)

I'm surprised, as Hell. Did not expect to get more than, maybe,
800-1000 3DMarks...

Just waxed 1,316 3DMarks, default settings, in 3DMark2003!

I was, totally, not expecting that.

--
Strontium

"I thought I'd lost you, somewhere. But you were, never, really ever
there at all.. And, I want to get free..."

I haven't purchased a card faster yet. There hasn't been a need to. It's
current, fast enough to play anything and at a good price.

neopolaris
"Strontium" wrote in message
...
Agreed, and agreed.
I knew it was a good card, before, this just blew my mind though.

-
Ron Merts stood up, at show-n-tell, and said:

It's amazing what an 800Mhz FSB and dual channel DDR will do for you.
And, the GF3 Ti200 really is not a bad video card, especially for the
money.

Ron

"Strontium" wrote in message
...
Just ran UT2003 benchmark. Is there someplace to compare, online?
Just spent last hour searching. No luck. Results, below.

Flyby:
63.635540 / 104.014900 / 303.517578 fps -- Score = 104.023140
rand[21984]


63.171356 / 149.412369 / 396.159241 fps -- Score = 149.541687
rand[13704]


Botmatch:
20.480404 / 49.142952 / 97.354958 fps -- Score = 49.170006
rand[28639]


30.974630 / 78.494148 / 153.320496 fps -- Score = 78.538834
rand[16548]


-
Strontium stood up, at show-n-tell, and said:

Just topped the list of others with my setup.

P4 2.4C
Intel D865GBF
Asus GF3 Ti200 @ 250/550
512MB Samsung PC3200 (2x256)

I'm surprised, as Hell. Did not expect to get more than, maybe,
800-1000 3DMarks...

Just waxed 1,316 3DMarks, default settings, in 3DMark2003!

I was, totally, not expecting that.

--
Strontium

"I thought I'd lost you, somewhere. But you were, never, really ever
there at all.. And, I want to get free..."

--
Strontium

"I thought I'd lost you, somewhere. But you were, never, really
ever there at all. And, I want to get free..."