If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ATA and SATA? or one or the other?
Hi All
I have a 81G1000 motherboard and have used up all my IDE spots - 2 x HDs ( 1 x 120 gig 1x 180 gig) and 2 x DVD Writers - and I need more HD space for video editing 1. Can I fit SATA drives now, as well as all those IDE devices? 2. Is it better for me to buy a PCI card that will give me some more IDE slots to fill, as I do have a couple of new IDE drives I could use (1 x 80 gig and 1 x 40 gig) Cost IS an important issue here David -- If we're not supposed to eat animals, why are they made out of meat? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
quietguy wrote in
: I have a different mobo but use the primary controller for 2 IDE drives the secondary controller for DVD Writer and DV-Rom drive. For the OS I am using 2 Seagate 160 gig barracudas running Raid 0 using the Intel SATA drivers and connection. Here is the good news they are blindingly fast. I would always now use SATA connections. My one IDE has an Ultra ATA/133 connection and can't touch the speed of the SATA drives. The only caution if you run an array use the Intel drivers and disable the Giga Byte connections in the BIOS they suck. One2Go |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
One2Go wrote:
quietguy wrote in : I have a different mobo but use the primary controller for 2 IDE drives the secondary controller for DVD Writer and DV-Rom drive. For the OS I am using 2 Seagate 160 gig barracudas running Raid 0 using the Intel SATA drivers and connection. Here is the good news they are blindingly fast. I would always now use SATA connections. My one IDE has an Ultra ATA/133 connection and can't touch the speed of the SATA drives. The only caution if you run an array use the Intel drivers and disable the Giga Byte connections in the BIOS they suck. Given that you have two sata drives in raid 0 it is hardly surprising that a single unraided drive can't keep up. A fair comparison would have 2x ATA drives in raid 0 as well. Brendan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Brendan S (Scratch User)" wrote in
u: One2Go wrote: quietguy wrote in : I have a different mobo but use the primary controller for 2 IDE drives the secondary controller for DVD Writer and DV-Rom drive. For the OS I am using 2 Seagate 160 gig barracudas running Raid 0 using the Intel SATA drivers and connection. Here is the good news they are blindingly fast. I would always now use SATA connections. My one IDE has an Ultra ATA/133 connection and can't touch the speed of the SATA drives. The only caution if you run an array use the Intel drivers and disable the Giga Byte connections in the BIOS they suck. Given that you have two sata drives in raid 0 it is hardly surprising that a single unraided drive can't keep up. A fair comparison would have 2x ATA drives in raid 0 as well. Brendan Fair enough, have not tried that yet. Because I had a HD crash last weekend I am evaluating my disk set-up at this time and perhaps will run the two ATAs in a raqid 0 config. One2Go |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|