If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
8KNXP and HT
Hi,
My 8KNXP system shows only 1 CPU in Task manager, yet 2 CPU's in Device Manager - the CPU is a P4 2.8c. HT has always been enabled in the bios, so I am curious if this is working correctly as it does not appear to. Bios is F5. Does anyone have any ideas? - Tim |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Yes. That is exactly what I am not seeing.
I check in Device Manager & as I said, there are 2 CPU's (really intel, who is kidding who?). The Computer in Device Manager says it is an ACPI Multi Processor PC, so XP seems to have all the correct device drivers as far as I can see. Updating the device driver for the Computer gives no options,which is correct as the only update would be a downgrade to Uni or non-acpi which requires a reinstall & is not a valid option... The only anomoly is the Task Manager display. The menu for View - CPU History has only 1 entry: One Graph per CPU which is ticked. Normally I think there are 2 items in this menu - a 1 graph and a 2 graph. XP SP 1 is in, but not alot else of patches (where is SP2, must be due soon?). - Tim "Timothy Drouillard" wrote in message ... Under the performance tab in Task manager, the top window should show two small windows side-by-side. one for each 'cpu'. is that what you're not seeing? "Tim" wrote in message ... Hi, My 8KNXP system shows only 1 CPU in Task manager, yet 2 CPU's in Device Manager - the CPU is a P4 2.8c. HT has always been enabled in the bios, so I am curious if this is working correctly as it does not appear to. Bios is F5. Does anyone have any ideas? - Tim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A friend had the same problem on his Asus mobo (same 875P chipset), and he
fixed it by enabling ACPI and reinstalling WinXP. Somehow the HT function must tie in with ACPI, but neither of us have figured out the details of this relationship. If anyone knows, please enlighten me! On the 8KNXP I don't think you can even disable ACPI, and my PM settings are all on the defaults that came with the F5 bios. Mine set up perfectly for HT from the outset. "Tim" wrote in message ... Hi, My 8KNXP system shows only 1 CPU in Task manager, yet 2 CPU's in Device Manager - the CPU is a P4 2.8c. HT has always been enabled in the bios, so I am curious if this is working correctly as it does not appear to. Bios is F5. Does anyone have any ideas? - Tim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The view menu should indeed have two choices
One Graph, all CPU's One graph per CPU "Tim" wrote in message ... Yes. That is exactly what I am not seeing. I check in Device Manager & as I said, there are 2 CPU's (really intel, who is kidding who?). The Computer in Device Manager says it is an ACPI Multi Processor PC, so XP seems to have all the correct device drivers as far as I can see. Updating the device driver for the Computer gives no options,which is correct as the only update would be a downgrade to Uni or non-acpi which requires a reinstall & is not a valid option... The only anomoly is the Task Manager display. The menu for View - CPU History has only 1 entry: One Graph per CPU which is ticked. Normally I think there are 2 items in this menu - a 1 graph and a 2 graph. XP SP 1 is in, but not alot else of patches (where is SP2, must be due soon?). - Tim "Timothy Drouillard" wrote in message ... Under the performance tab in Task manager, the top window should show two small windows side-by-side. one for each 'cpu'. is that what you're not seeing? "Tim" wrote in message ... Hi, My 8KNXP system shows only 1 CPU in Task manager, yet 2 CPU's in Device Manager - the CPU is a P4 2.8c. HT has always been enabled in the bios, so I am curious if this is working correctly as it does not appear to. Bios is F5. Does anyone have any ideas? - Tim |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks Bob, so no easy fix then?
Well, my Device Manage config says ACPI Mult... and lists 2 CPU's... Odd, I think I'll put this down to yet another Award bios oddity. The only items in the bios I tinkered with prior to install was to get the SATA boot disc recognised. - Tim "Bob Davis" wrote in message .. . A friend had the same problem on his Asus mobo (same 875P chipset), and he fixed it by enabling ACPI and reinstalling WinXP. Somehow the HT function must tie in with ACPI, but neither of us have figured out the details of this relationship. If anyone knows, please enlighten me! On the 8KNXP I don't think you can even disable ACPI, and my PM settings are all on the defaults that came with the F5 bios. Mine set up perfectly for HT from the outset. "Tim" wrote in message ... Hi, My 8KNXP system shows only 1 CPU in Task manager, yet 2 CPU's in Device Manager - the CPU is a P4 2.8c. HT has always been enabled in the bios, so I am curious if this is working correctly as it does not appear to. Bios is F5. Does anyone have any ideas? - Tim |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Good question.
Apart from wanting things to work correctly, I am used to dual CPU systems, and it does seem that hyperthreading does smooth out the performance of an otherwise single CPU systems. Try an experiment. Run one copy of zip or rar on a large file. Then start another rar / zip on a second file at the same time and watch the two CPU's in task manager. Ok, so its a little bit of a visual lie... but I am sure you can get my drift on this. Now while this is running check the responsiveness of the machine by doing something else. EG opening apps and typing. I am sure you will find the system runs much smoother with HT. Some of this is possibly attributable to XP with a higher spec CPU, but overall compared to preceeding single CPU systems an HT system does seem to have much better smoothness to it and that is a characteristic of a Dual. Again, it may be just an illusion 'cos when the IDE channels get busy, the system still runs like a dog - but this is much more difficult. I am interested to hear what peoples experience is of SCSI on HT systems, and the 8KNXP Ultra RAID. BTW: I got it going by doing an XP repair. - Tim "Boudewijn" wrote in message ... Hello, Why bother? It's only useful if you're using software that it specifically written to make use of 2 CPU's Failing that and you could have 4, 8,16 etc CPU's in your box, and It wouldn't make a difference at all. So again, why bother?! Regards, Boudewijn "Tim" wrote in message ... Hi, My 8KNXP system shows only 1 CPU in Task manager, yet 2 CPU's in Device Manager - the CPU is a P4 2.8c. HT has always been enabled in the bios, so I am curious if this is working correctly as it does not appear to. Bios is F5. Does anyone have any ideas? - Tim |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Boudewijn" wrote in message ... Why bother? It's only useful if you're using software that it specifically written to make use of 2 CPU's That's true, but more and more of these apps are being written. I for one bought into HT (2.8C) because I use PhotoShop and Nikon Capture, both of which can make use of dual-processor technology. The HT makes a dramatic difference with these apps. My friend was concerned because he also works in PS, plus a complex stock-analysis app that also uses it. He claims his P4 3.0C runs the latter 3x faster than his old Athlon 1400XP. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Wrong! There are so many benefit for having 2 cpus even when you don't use
program that take advantage of it. It allows you to multi-task with much better response and performance. Rip/burn Cd/DVD in the background. Multiple download form different program, etc, etc. Regards John Yuen Boudewijn wrote: Hello, Why bother? It's only useful if you're using software that it specifically written to make use of 2 CPU's Failing that and you could have 4, 8,16 etc CPU's in your box, and It wouldn't make a difference at all. So again, why bother?! Regards, Boudewijn "Tim" wrote in message ... Hi, My 8KNXP system shows only 1 CPU in Task manager, yet 2 CPU's in Device Manager - the CPU is a P4 2.8c. HT has always been enabled in the bios, so I am curious if this is working correctly as it does not appear to. Bios is F5. Does anyone have any ideas? - Tim |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I was always under the impression that any advantage gained from
dual-processors could be achieved only when the software is written for it. "John Yuen" wrote in message ... Wrong! There are so many benefit for having 2 cpus even when you don't use program that take advantage of it. It allows you to multi-task with much better response and performance. Rip/burn Cd/DVD in the background. Multiple download form different program, etc, etc. Regards John Yuen |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Bob,
A common misconception. Any other task will benefit in a dual CPU situation - CD burning / ripping as mentioned, FTP, switching to another app etc. etc. I do a lot of database 'slice and dice' as I call it - large queries. A dual is a fat lot of use to a person that types with two fingers and only ever uses one application at a time - the system will be smoother, but this will be barely noticeable. I am a software developer - I always have heaps to do, so having a machine that works as fast as I think means I earn more. When one task is working, I switch to another and keep working flat out. SCSI discs help a lot here, although IDE with RAID seems to be a good option. I have a rule of thumb - doesn't quite work these days - but it goes like this. When buying a system, don't buy at the very top of the CPU spec list, buy one down EG 2.8G instead of 3G, get a dual motherboard, and when the price of the CPU's drop, get another CPU - heaven. This used to work well - prior to P4. The price delta between top spec and 1 off top spec CPU's is often great, while the diffference in performance is usually 10%. The CPU price delta usually exceeds the price margin for a dual capable m/b. In addition to this, I have found that the machines I buy like this last me a *lot* longer - they perform extremely well, and so because of the quality of the user experience, one is happier using the machine for a lot longer. Duals tend to be the most reliable m/b's. I have only just - with this P42.8Ghz machine come across a machine that COMPARES to the dual P2 400 server I have. Most of the work is somewhat faster on this machine, but a full application compile (MS VC) has gone from 20+ minutes down to about 2. So, I am waiting with baited breath to see how Opterons pan out - I may get a dual again. The P2 400 server runs 24 x 7 and was purchased in 1998 I think - Asus P2B-DS with 640MB Ram, never crashes. Another way to look at it is: if you computer keeps you waiting 5% of the time, you cost 100,000 units per annum to employ, using a dual you estimate - after stuffing around, gettting coffee, chatting to others, email etc. - to save 50% of the wait time, then 2.5% of 100,000 units is 2,500. If thats dollars, thats either another PC or a dual with money saved, more productiviy, closer to deadlines etc. (Don't forget that if you are paid n$, the cost of employment is likely around 2 x n$). This ignores the fact that on a dual you can be running lengthy processes without costing anything. EG writing CD's. - Tim "Bob Davis" wrote in message news I was always under the impression that any advantage gained from dual-processors could be achieved only when the software is written for it. "John Yuen" wrote in message ... Wrong! There are so many benefit for having 2 cpus even when you don't use program that take advantage of it. It allows you to multi-task with much better response and performance. Rip/burn Cd/DVD in the background. Multiple download form different program, etc, etc. Regards John Yuen |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
8KNXP - Corsair Twinx 3700 - Bios F8 | Matt. Davies | Overclocking | 5 | December 16th 03 09:01 AM |
GA 8KNXP memory bandwidth issues | RC | Overclocking | 1 | November 11th 03 11:36 PM |
overclock 8knxp | Luca | Overclocking | 4 | October 8th 03 05:13 PM |
Gigabyte GA 8KNXP OC | Kernel | Overclocking | 1 | September 18th 03 05:08 AM |
Switch from 8INXP to 8KNXP | Boudewijn | Gigabyte Motherboards | 4 | July 23rd 03 02:50 PM |