If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
GA-8KNXP LAN Speed problem...
Hello,
Has anyone else noticed a problem with the onboard "Intel Pro/1000 CT Desktop" ethernet controller only detecting a 10 MB network, even if you're on a 100 MB network? This problem is driving me insane. I've already tried flashing the BIOS and updating the drivers, and the problem persists. Their stupid software thinks there's a bad wire or something, and I tested all 8 wires myself, and they're fine. I even tested it with multiple patch cords. Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
First of all, are you using high quality patch cables that are certified for
100-Base-T? If you buy your patch cables, I would reccomend that you buy patch cables certified as Cat-5e. If you install the Intel Proset software that came on the CD, you can bring that up, and try changing the speed setting there. It normally defaults to auto-set, but you can manually choose your speed. "Bob Davis" wrote in message .. . wrote in message ... Has anyone else noticed a problem with the onboard "Intel Pro/1000 CT Desktop" ethernet controller only detecting a 10 MB network, even if you're on a 100 MB network? How can you tell? I have a P2P with three computers (two now since the notebook is in the shop), and I have no problems that I'm aware of. Their stupid software thinks there's a bad wire or something, and I tested all 8 wires myself, and they're fine. I even tested it with multiple patch cords. Is it generating errors? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Has anyone else noticed a problem with the onboard "Intel
Pro/1000 CT Desktop" ethernet controller only detecting a 10 MB network, even if you're on a 100 MB network? How can you tell? I have a P2P with three computers (two now since the notebook is in the shop), and I have no problems that I'm aware of. It says so in the Intel PROset software that came with the motherboard. There's a button that says, "Test Link Speed". When I test it, this is what it says back: "A Category 5 cable is required to run at 1000 Mbps. The cable connected to the device either has only two pairs or has faulty wires." Also, the 100 light on the router is turned out for this port - only the 10 is turned on. FYI, I have tried switching to another jack and also tested the cable with another computer (works at 100 there). There's also a "Test Cable" button, and that doesn't detect any errors on the line. The funny part, is I made this particular wire myself using Cat5e cable, so it should be good for 100 or 1000. I don't have any problems with any of my other computers reaching 100 - I'm not really going for the full 1000 speed here (I personally thing that's a waste of time until hard drives become faster). Their stupid software thinks there's a bad wire or something, and I tested all 8 wires myself, and they're fine. I even tested it with multiple patch cords. Is it generating errors? No there are no errors. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
First of all, are you using high quality patch cables that are certified for 100-Base-T? If you buy your patch cables, I would reccomend that you buy patch cables certified as Cat-5e. If you install the Intel Proset software that came on the CD, you can bring that up, and try changing the speed setting there. It normally defaults to auto-set, but you can manually choose your speed. I have a few store bought cables, but I usually make them myself from Cat-5e cable. I know they work, because the router always detects them at 100 and I can transfer files a lot faster than 10 mbps. I tested it with this new NIC, and it's taking 15 mins to transfer a file that used to come across in 3 or 4 mins - so the software's not misreporting the speed or anything. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ... I know they work, because the router always detects them at 100.... How can you tell? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The easy part is what color wire goes to what pin.
1. White with Orange stripe 2. Orange with White stripe. 3. White with Green stripe. 4. Blue with White stripe 5. White with Blue stripe 6. Green with White stripe 7. White with Brown stripe 8. Brown with White strip. Thanks for the info, it's always good to double-check yourself, but that's exactly how I make my cables. 1. White/Orange 2. Orange 3. White/Green 4. Blue 5. White/Blue 6. Green 7. White/Brown 8. Brown The easiest way to quickly doublecheck yourself before you crimp the connector, is to verify that the wires (from 1 to 8) are stripe, solid, stripe, solid, etc. I'll have to keep that in mind for next time. The trickier part (for higher speed operation) is how far back you untwist the pairs in order to feed them into the connector. At 10Base-T speeds, it's not very picky. At higher speeds you want to majke sure you only untwist the pairs JUST far enough to be able to feed the individual wires into the connector. That's funny, because my friends complain that I take too long to make my cables, because I'm making them just like you described. Most people let it all hang out and just put a boot on it - I personally don't like that. Now you've justified my slowness in making cables! :-) Another weird thing I just noticed, and this is kind of a slap in the face, is the Intel PROset software has this message: This adapter is capable of connecting at a higher speed. I have a feeling Intel created this NIC with 1000 only in mind. I have no way of checking the impedience on the lines, but I have check all of them for continuity. Is anyone out there running this same exact board on a 100mbps network successfully? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I Have mine cabled to a Linksys Cable/DSL Router (connecting at 100mbs)
along with a second PC (also connected at 100Base-T) and two printers and it works flawlessly. Yes the Intel software tells you it's capable of higher speed, it can go to 1000mbs . wrote in message ... The easy part is what color wire goes to what pin. 1. White with Orange stripe 2. Orange with White stripe. 3. White with Green stripe. 4. Blue with White stripe 5. White with Blue stripe 6. Green with White stripe 7. White with Brown stripe 8. Brown with White strip. Thanks for the info, it's always good to double-check yourself, but that's exactly how I make my cables. 1. White/Orange 2. Orange 3. White/Green 4. Blue 5. White/Blue 6. Green 7. White/Brown 8. Brown The easiest way to quickly doublecheck yourself before you crimp the connector, is to verify that the wires (from 1 to 8) are stripe, solid, stripe, solid, etc. I'll have to keep that in mind for next time. The trickier part (for higher speed operation) is how far back you untwist the pairs in order to feed them into the connector. At 10Base-T speeds, it's not very picky. At higher speeds you want to majke sure you only untwist the pairs JUST far enough to be able to feed the individual wires into the connector. That's funny, because my friends complain that I take too long to make my cables, because I'm making them just like you described. Most people let it all hang out and just put a boot on it - I personally don't like that. Now you've justified my slowness in making cables! :-) Another weird thing I just noticed, and this is kind of a slap in the face, is the Intel PROset software has this message: This adapter is capable of connecting at a higher speed. I have a feeling Intel created this NIC with 1000 only in mind. I have no way of checking the impedience on the lines, but I have check all of them for continuity. Is anyone out there running this same exact board on a 100mbps network successfully? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Also check to make sure you're running at full duplex as well.
wrote in message ... wrote in message .. . I know they work, because the router always detects them at 100.... How can you tell? I can tell by my transmission speeds, which seem to be limited by my hard drives. I can send roughly 1 gig over the network in 7 mins. Now it wants to take a lot longer (over twice the time), and it's only because it's being limited by that 10mbps ethernet connection - doesn't even hit the bottleneck in the hard drives now. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Also check to make sure you're running at full duplex as well.
Well, I checked eveything I could, and it all looks fine. I just had a good idea... I'm going to test it through a hub, and see if this NIC is incompatible with my router. I figure the hub will talk to the router, thus bypassing the whole situation of this NIC talking directly to the router. Guess what guys?!! It worked! Going through the hub it has no problem connecting at 100. FYI, I'm using the same exact cable to connect, and I previously tested other ports on the router. Now I just have to figure out why this NIC doesn't like my router - I have a Netgear RT314. Anyone else using one with this motherboard successfully? Thanks everyone for all your help, I really really appreciate it. This was driving me up a wall. I might have to email Intel and Netgear to see if they know anything we don't. I'm just glad to be back at 100! |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pentium II Upgrade Problem | [email protected] | General | 5 | January 8th 05 05:15 PM |
AGP Speed | JimBob | Homebuilt PC's | 4 | November 28th 04 12:10 AM |
fsb speed - why does it matter? | James Hanley | Overclocking | 52 | November 7th 04 01:04 PM |
I still don't completly understand FSB.... | legion | Homebuilt PC's | 7 | October 28th 04 03:20 AM |
A7V8X RAM/CPU speed problem | John Simon | Asus Motherboards | 7 | April 15th 04 05:52 PM |