A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Video Cards » Nvidia Videocards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sparkle 8600GT with extremely slow memory clock.HELP please



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 21st 08, 03:11 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Sparkle 8600GT with extremely slow memory clock.HELP please

I have just bought a Sparkle Geforce 8600 GT (SF-PX86GT512U2-HP) for
AU
$135.


http://www.sparkle.com.tw/product_de...=63&sub_id=121

I found out that Sparkle fits a very slow DDR2 memory on this card.
GPU-z reported:

Gpu = 540 MHz (That's fine)
Memory = 300 MHz (?!!!!!!)
shader = 1188 MHz (That's fine)

RivaTuner , AtiTool and GPU-z all reported that the memory clock of
this card only runs at 300Mhz (Which means x2=600MHz?), compared to
other brands' 8600GT cards .Their memory clock all runs at around
1.4GHz-1.6GHz range (the Gigabyte GV-NX86T512H) for example.

How come a 8600GT card runs at 600 MHz memory clock spds?
My old 6600GT at least have 1000MHz memory clock speed.


Strange thing on Sparkle web site is that they do report the memory
clock speed of their DDR3 range of 8600GT but said nothing about the
8600GT DDR2 memory clock speed?


I read a lots about memory clock of other brands of 8600GT on the net
and I never saw such a slow memory clock like this card. Did I miss
something? Maybe I interpretate the clock speed wrongly, x4 or x2?

If you have a Sparkle 8600GT card with 512 MB DDR2 please check for
me with Rivatuner, ATiTool or GPU-z to see if it reports
memory clock at 300MHz or not.


Your feedback is greatly appreciated.


Thanks and regards,


  #2  
Old April 21st 08, 03:50 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
Paul
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,364
Default Sparkle 8600GT with extremely slow memory clock.HELP please

wrote:
I have just bought a Sparkle Geforce 8600 GT (SF-PX86GT512U2-HP) for
AU
$135.


http://www.sparkle.com.tw/product_de...=63&sub_id=121

I found out that Sparkle fits a very slow DDR2 memory on this card.
GPU-z reported:

Gpu = 540 MHz (That's fine)
Memory = 300 MHz (?!!!!!!)
shader = 1188 MHz (That's fine)

RivaTuner , AtiTool and GPU-z all reported that the memory clock of
this card only runs at 300Mhz (Which means x2=600MHz?), compared to
other brands' 8600GT cards .Their memory clock all runs at around
1.4GHz-1.6GHz range (the Gigabyte GV-NX86T512H) for example.

How come a 8600GT card runs at 600 MHz memory clock spds?
My old 6600GT at least have 1000MHz memory clock speed.


Strange thing on Sparkle web site is that they do report the memory
clock speed of their DDR3 range of 8600GT but said nothing about the
8600GT DDR2 memory clock speed?


I read a lots about memory clock of other brands of 8600GT on the net
and I never saw such a slow memory clock like this card. Did I miss
something? Maybe I interpretate the clock speed wrongly, x4 or x2?

If you have a Sparkle 8600GT card with 512 MB DDR2 please check for
me with Rivatuner, ATiTool or GPU-z to see if it reports
memory clock at 300MHz or not.


Your feedback is greatly appreciated.


Thanks and regards,



On the Chaintech site, I can see a wide range of clock speeds for the
memory on their cards. I also see the same thing on the Newegg site,
when looking at 44 different 8600GT cards.

http://www.chaintechusa.com/a211_pro...ate2.php?pos=8

You can see more examples listed here.

http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards....rd1=513&card2=

Looks like up to a factor of 4 between the slowest memory
and the fastest available memory.

Paul
  #3  
Old April 21st 08, 06:38 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Sparkle 8600GT with extremely slow memory clock.HELP please

On Apr 22, 12:50*am, Paul wrote:
wrote:
I have just bought a Sparkle Geforce 8600 GT (SF-PX86GT512U2-HP) for
AU
$135.


http://www.sparkle.com.tw/product_de...=63&sub_id=121


I found out that Sparkle fits a very slow DDR2 memory on this card.
GPU-z reported:


Gpu = 540 MHz (That's fine)
Memory = 300 MHz (?!!!!!!)
shader = 1188 MHz (That's fine)


RivaTuner , AtiTool and GPU-z all reported that the memory clock of
this card only runs at 300Mhz (Which means x2=600MHz?), compared to
other brands' 8600GT cards .Their memory clock all runs at around
1.4GHz-1.6GHz range (the Gigabyte GV-NX86T512H) for example.


How come a 8600GT card runs at 600 MHz memory clock spds?
My old 6600GT at least have 1000MHz memory clock speed.


Strange thing on Sparkle web site is that they do report the memory
clock speed of their DDR3 range of 8600GT but said nothing about the
8600GT DDR2 memory clock speed?


I read a lots about memory clock of other brands of 8600GT on the net
and I never saw such a slow memory clock like this card. Did I miss
something? Maybe I interpretate the clock speed wrongly, x4 or x2?


*If you have a Sparkle 8600GT card with 512 MB DDR2 please check for
me with Rivatuner, ATiTool or GPU-z to see if it reports
memory clock at 300MHz or not.


Your feedback is greatly appreciated.


Thanks and regards,


On the Chaintech site, I can see a wide range of clock speeds for the
memory on their cards. I also see the same thing on the Newegg site,
when looking at 44 different 8600GT cards.

http://www.chaintechusa.com/a211_pro...ate2.php?pos=8

You can see more examples listed here.

http://www.gpureview.com/show_cards....rd1=513&card2=

Looks like up to a factor of 4 between the slowest memory
and the fastest available memory.

* * Paul- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -



I wonder how much performance hit the Sparkle card would suffer
compared to other high memory clock frequency card if it is only
600MHz to start with?



  #5  
Old April 23rd 08, 02:23 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
First of One[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,284
Default Sparkle 8600GT with extremely slow memory clock.HELP please

The reference memory speed for the 8600GT is 700MHz DDR, or 1.4 GHz
effective. A 57% memory speed decrease is pretty severe. The memory chips
are exposed on your card, right? What latency are the chips rated for?

--
"War is the continuation of politics by other means.
It can therefore be said that politics is war without
bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed."


wrote in message
...
I wonder how much performance hit the Sparkle card would suffer
compared to other high memory clock frequency card if it is only
600MHz to start with?




  #6  
Old April 23rd 08, 09:21 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Sparkle 8600GT with extremely slow memory clock.HELP please

On Apr 23, 11:23*am, "First of One" wrote:
The reference memory speed for the 8600GT is 700MHz DDR, or 1.4 GHz
effective. A 57% memory speed decrease is pretty severe. The memory chips
are exposed on your card, right? What latency are the chips rated for?


I will read the latency and let you know.

I think I learned a lesson from this experience that I should not have
assumed anything and should make thorough online research before went
out and buy video card.

I thought that all 8600GT cards should be manufactured at minimum
specifications of core and memory speed set forth by NVIDIS reference
card (540/1400).

I am really shocked to read that my card runs at a 9.6GB/s memory
bandwidth, compared to a 26.00Gb/s of the reference card.

Even my old 6600GT (500/1000) (which I upgraded from) has higher
bandwidth (16.00GB/s) than this card.

I feel so upset having paid such a high price (Au$135) for the card
thas has SLOWEST memory clock of all 8600GT cards on the market right
now.




  #7  
Old April 24th 08, 03:06 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
First of One[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,284
Default Sparkle 8600GT with extremely slow memory clock.HELP please

Just to be clear, the 300 MHz memory clock you saw was in 3D, right? Most
nVidia cards since the FX5800 throttle back under 2D to conserve power. You
can confirm this by running Rivatuner's real-time strip charts.

--
"War is the continuation of politics by other means.
It can therefore be said that politics is war without
bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed."


wrote in message
...
On Apr 23, 11:23 am, "First of One" wrote:
The reference memory speed for the 8600GT is 700MHz DDR, or 1.4 GHz
effective. A 57% memory speed decrease is pretty severe. The memory chips
are exposed on your card, right? What latency are the chips rated for?


I will read the latency and let you know.

I think I learned a lesson from this experience that I should not have
assumed anything and should make thorough online research before went
out and buy video card.

I thought that all 8600GT cards should be manufactured at minimum
specifications of core and memory speed set forth by NVIDIS reference
card (540/1400).

I am really shocked to read that my card runs at a 9.6GB/s memory
bandwidth, compared to a 26.00Gb/s of the reference card.

Even my old 6600GT (500/1000) (which I upgraded from) has higher
bandwidth (16.00GB/s) than this card.

I feel so upset having paid such a high price (Au$135) for the card
thas has SLOWEST memory clock of all 8600GT cards on the market right
now.





  #8  
Old April 24th 08, 07:35 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
Mr.E Solved!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 888
Default Sparkle 8600GT with extremely slow memory clock.HELP please

First of One wrote:
Just to be clear, the 300 MHz memory clock you saw was in 3D, right? Most
nVidia cards since the FX5800 throttle back under 2D to conserve power. You
can confirm this by running Rivatuner's real-time strip charts.


The OP couldn't even be bothered to run any benchmarks, he does not know
and seemingly does not care that his card might just be a-ok.

OP if that ram really is clocked slower, you can easily increase it.
Sadly, it is a process that involves a minimum of hand-wringing, so you
might be disappointed.
  #9  
Old April 24th 08, 11:39 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4
Default Sparkle 8600GT with extremely slow memory clock.HELP please

On Apr 24, 4:35*pm, "Mr.E Solved!" wrote:
First of One wrote:
Just to be clear, the 300 MHz memory clock you saw was in 3D, right? Most
nVidia cards since the FX5800 throttle back under 2D to conserve power. You
can confirm this by running Rivatuner's real-time strip charts.


The OP couldn't even be bothered to run any benchmarks, he does not know
and seemingly does not care that his card might just be a-ok.

OP if that ram really is clocked slower, you can easily increase it.
Sadly, it is a process that involves a minimum of hand-wringing, so you
might be disappointed.


The 300 MHz is in 3d as well (effective 600MHz) (I have tested it with
AtiTool).
Based on this web site:
http://liightt.blogspot.com/2008/01/...dr2-512mb.html

The card run Crysis at 14-22 fps at 1024 x 768 and 9fps at 1280x1024
at medium setting.
I don't know if this is OK?

I do not think my card is OK based solely on the fact that my card
runs at a 9.6GB/s memory bandwidth, compared to a 22.00Gb/s of the
reference card.
The strange thing is when I did a Google search on Sparkle 8600GT at
540/600
the only results I see are originated from Poland or Lithuania...I
never see a result from US, UK or Australia. That makes me think this
is a strange card, for a different market...But somehow made it to
Australia, where I may be the only one who got it. (Conspiracy
Theory

I may have a weird psychology that if I did not know about the
specifications of the card, I might have been happy with it (Ignorance
is bliss) but once I knew about its abysmal memory speed compared to
other normal 8600GT cards, I could not get over that fact and now
looked at the card with different views...
I know it's weird to comprehend, but honestly that was what I feel.
Performance anxiety kills joy....







  #10  
Old April 24th 08, 03:27 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
Mr.E Solved!
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 888
Default Sparkle 8600GT with extremely slow memory clock.HELP please

wrote:
On Apr 24, 4:35 pm, "Mr.E Solved!" wrote:
First of One wrote:
Just to be clear, the 300 MHz memory clock you saw was in 3D, right? Most
nVidia cards since the FX5800 throttle back under 2D to conserve power. You
can confirm this by running Rivatuner's real-time strip charts.

The OP couldn't even be bothered to run any benchmarks, he does not know
and seemingly does not care that his card might just be a-ok.

OP if that ram really is clocked slower, you can easily increase it.
Sadly, it is a process that involves a minimum of hand-wringing, so you
might be disappointed.


The 300 MHz is in 3d as well (effective 600MHz) (I have tested it with
AtiTool).
Based on this web site:
http://liightt.blogspot.com/2008/01/...dr2-512mb.html

The card run Crysis at 14-22 fps at 1024 x 768 and 9fps at 1280x1024
at medium setting.
I don't know if this is OK?

I do not think my card is OK based solely on the fact that my card
runs at a 9.6GB/s memory bandwidth, compared to a 22.00Gb/s of the
reference card.
The strange thing is when I did a Google search on Sparkle 8600GT at
540/600
the only results I see are originated from Poland or Lithuania...I
never see a result from US, UK or Australia. That makes me think this
is a strange card, for a different market...But somehow made it to
Australia, where I may be the only one who got it. (Conspiracy
Theory

I may have a weird psychology that if I did not know about the
specifications of the card, I might have been happy with it (Ignorance
is bliss) but once I knew about its abysmal memory speed compared to
other normal 8600GT cards, I could not get over that fact and now
looked at the card with different views...
I know it's weird to comprehend, but honestly that was what I feel.
Performance anxiety kills joy....


Oh dear. I do empathize with you, Aussies have a difficult hardware
market. High prices, limited availability, ironically all while being
substantially closer to the factory. To top it all off it appears AU is
where the dreg products get sent, no matter what the product.

The good news is, if you are satisfied with 22 FPS MAX, 14 AVG and 9 FPS
MIN in Crysis @ 1024, then you are good to go. Those settings are so low
as to be considered unplayable, so you got lucky.

Run 3DMark, get FPS and shader scores, then use ORB to see how your
results compare, all the while saving your tokens and stamps and juju
beans to trade for a better card, the 8600's are runts of the
gaming-card litter.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adaptec 2810SA extremely fast or extremely slow? Fondazione Distrofici Onlus Storage & Hardrives 2 September 7th 07 08:29 AM
Adaptec 2810SA extremely fast or extremely slow? Fondazione Distrofici Onlus Storage & Hardrives 0 September 5th 07 05:54 PM
x800xl slow memory clock? Steve Schaub Ati Videocards 1 October 6th 05 03:04 AM
Core clock/memory clock vs engine/memory clock ftran999 Ati Videocards 2 August 6th 04 01:29 AM
BIOS Clock extremely slow and getting worse :( Cyde Weys General 0 July 5th 03 07:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.