If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Really makes sense - NOT
So a 6800GS and a 7300GS
Which do you think would be faster!!! 6800GS = £140 7300GS = £50 SlicK p.s I have a 6800GS and I know the 7300GS will be slower |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Really makes sense - NOT
Nothing out of the ordinary. The 6200 is slower than the 5900. The 5200 is
slower than the 4600. nVidia's model numbers are catching up with Radeon model numbers from a few years ago. Some users already confuse the Radeon 7500 with the Geforce 7-series. -- "War is the continuation of politics by other means. It can therefore be said that politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed." "Slick the Original" wrote in message ... So a 6800GS and a 7300GS Which do you think would be faster!!! 6800GS = £140 7300GS = £50 SlicK p.s I have a 6800GS and I know the 7300GS will be slower |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Really makes sense - NOT
It's simple. The first digit is the series or family number. So a 6200 is
of the same family as the 6800. The remaining digits, for the most part, represent it's performance relative to the rest of it's family. So a 5900 is faster than a 5700 and a 5600 is faster than a 5200. Now does it make sense? DaveL "First of One" wrote in message ... Nothing out of the ordinary. The 6200 is slower than the 5900. The 5200 is slower than the 4600. nVidia's model numbers are catching up with Radeon model numbers from a few years ago. Some users already confuse the Radeon 7500 with the Geforce 7-series. -- "War is the continuation of politics by other means. It can therefore be said that politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed." "Slick the Original" wrote in message ... So a 6800GS and a 7300GS Which do you think would be faster!!! 6800GS = £140 7300GS = £50 SlicK p.s I have a 6800GS and I know the 7300GS will be slower |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Really makes sense - NOT
So does it work like this?
7900 7800 7600 6800 7300 6600 5900 6500 5700 6200 5600 4800 5200 4600 4200 Then throw in GT, LE, and GS in there and it really jumbles things up! "DaveL" Top Poster Extraordinaire wrote in message . .. It's simple. The first digit is the series or family number. So a 6200 is of the same family as the 6800. The remaining digits, for the most part, represent it's performance relative to the rest of it's family. So a 5900 is faster than a 5700 and a 5600 is faster than a 5200. Now does it make sense? DaveL "First of One" wrote in message ... Nothing out of the ordinary. The 6200 is slower than the 5900. The 5200 is slower than the 4600. nVidia's model numbers are catching up with Radeon model numbers from a few years ago. Some users already confuse the Radeon 7500 with the Geforce 7-series. -- "War is the continuation of politics by other means. It can therefore be said that politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed." "Slick the Original" wrote in message ... So a 6800GS and a 7300GS Which do you think would be faster!!! 6800GS = £140 7300GS = £50 SlicK p.s I have a 6800GS and I know the 7300GS will be slower |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Really makes sense - NOT
You got waaaay too much time on your hands... that, and the 7300 should be
moved down one notch, while the 4800 and 4600 are at the same level. -- "War is the continuation of politics by other means. It can therefore be said that politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed." "HockeyTownUSA" magma at comcast dot net wrote in message . .. So does it work like this? 7900 7800 7600 6800 7300 6600 5900 6500 5700 6200 5600 4800 5200 4600 4200 Then throw in GT, LE, and GS in there and it really jumbles things up! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Really makes sense - NOT
A 4800 and 4600 are same level? I don't think so. Ti4800 was slightly more
powerful than the Ti4600, otherwise, why buy one over the other? And as far as time on my hands, it took me all of five minutes (if that). Typing text and using the tab key isn't that hard to do. "First of One" wrote in message ... You got waaaay too much time on your hands... that, and the 7300 should be moved down one notch, while the 4800 and 4600 are at the same level. -- "War is the continuation of politics by other means. It can therefore be said that politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed." "HockeyTownUSA" magma at comcast dot net wrote in message . .. So does it work like this? 7900 7800 7600 6800 7300 6600 5900 6500 5700 6200 5600 4800 5200 4600 4200 Then throw in GT, LE, and GS in there and it really jumbles things up! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Really makes sense - NOT
"HockeyTownUSA" magma at comcast dot net wrote in message
... A 4800 and 4600 are same level? I don't think so. Ti4800 was slightly more powerful than the Ti4600, otherwise, why buy one over the other? The 4800 denotes a 4600 with AGP8x support, with exactly the same clock speeds, which doesn't do much for performance. Here's an article: http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_cont...kie%5Ftest =1 -- "War is the continuation of politics by other means. It can therefore be said that politics is war without bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mike Richter: CD-R FAQ Makes a Common Mistake | smh | Cdr | 5 | March 11th 06 04:12 PM |
Mike Richter: CD-R FAQ makes a Common Mistake | smh | Cdr | 1 | November 10th 05 06:32 AM |
Do Inkjets Make Sense Anymore? | zakezuke | Printers | 17 | November 8th 05 08:01 PM |
Mike Richter: CD-R FAQ makes a Common Mistake | smh | Cdr | 2 | September 9th 05 06:55 PM |
PC makes weired noises | Krish | General | 4 | July 20th 03 07:56 AM |