A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Motherboards » Gigabyte Motherboards
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

CPU Purchase questions...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 10th 05, 01:58 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.gigabyte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CPU Purchase questions...

I currently have a K8N Ultra-9 motherboard. I'm expecting to get my X-
mas bonus from work in a couple weeks, and am looking at possibly
upgrading my CPU.

My question is, working with a $300-350 price limit, which would give
more "bang for the buck?" I'm looking at either a 4000+ (San diego
core), or a 3800 X2 (not sure on teh core, 2x512Kb cache)

So far, from the benches I've seen, the 4000 would be the better choice,
as I am primarily a gamer, and (so far) games do not benefit over much
from dual-core.

Any comments, suggestions?

Thank you

--
-------------------------------------
Reply to for SPAM only

All others use:
m0ng0l.h0rde @ gmail . com

Remove spaces to send
Thank you
-------------------------------------
  #2  
Old December 11th 05, 04:45 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.mainboard.gigabyte
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default CPU Purchase questions...


"Jason Ash" wrote in message
. 97.142...
I currently have a K8N Ultra-9 motherboard. I'm expecting to get my X-
mas bonus from work in a couple weeks, and am looking at possibly
upgrading my CPU.

My question is, working with a $300-350 price limit, which would give
more "bang for the buck?" I'm looking at either a 4000+ (San diego
core), or a 3800 X2 (not sure on teh core, 2x512Kb cache)

So far, from the benches I've seen, the 4000 would be the better choice,
as I am primarily a gamer, and (so far) games do not benefit over much
from dual-core.

Any comments, suggestions?

Thank you

--
-------------------------------------
Reply to for SPAM only

All others use:
m0ng0l.h0rde @ gmail . com

Remove spaces to send
Thank you
------------------------------------


I'd still opt for the higher speed San Diego. There doesn't seem to be any
through-put advantage to the dual core.
JPS


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
OT - DONT PURCHASE HALF-LIFE 2 PRIVATE1964 Nvidia Videocards 48 December 10th 04 08:26 PM
Slightly off-topic questions about AMD64 Mary Richards Intel 5 July 25th 04 06:29 AM
Beyond the Office [Burning Questions: Good-Bye CD-RW, Hello DVD - 05/18/2004] Ablang General 0 May 23rd 04 03:35 AM
Microsoft Settlement Cash Vouchers to purchase computer products for those who purchase MS products for use in CA between 2/18/1995 to 12/15/2001 Drydem Packard Bell Computers 0 November 11th 03 12:48 PM
serial ATA vs ATA133...can't decide on wich...to much unanswered questions... KILOWATT General 2 July 12th 03 10:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.