If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
On 6/21/2010 12:57 AM, Robert Myers wrote:
I had previously noted the puniness of power supplies on OEM boxes, but not by overloading them to the point where the machine wouldn't run. I don't think that upping the RAM by 50% and adding a HDD causing a power supply overload is a reasonable expectation. Something else about this machine that is shaved very close is the thermal design. It will not run for long with the side cover removed. That wouldn't surprise me if the side cover included a duct, but there are only holes strategically placed in the side panel. The CPU has an enormous heat sink, but no fan of its own! Robert. About a year ago, I bought a Zalman 600W PS, which other manufacturers apparently repackage and call a 750W PS. So I think there is probably some conservative design involved here. You might consider changing the power supply to something like this. From your other messages in this thread, it sounds like you got yourself a pretty high-end Core i7 of the original triple-channel variety. So you getting marginal PS with it, is pretty surprising, as it must be a pretty expensive machine otherwise. Regarding it having only a big heat sink with no fan, this would probably indicate to me that the heat sink depends on the power supply's own fan to move air over the CPU. This would also explain why keeping the case cover off is bad for it, as the cover is probably integral in directing the air over the CPU heat sink. Yousuf Khan |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part: I had previously noted the puniness of power supplies on OEM boxes, but not by overloading them to the point where the machine wouldn't run. I don't think that upping the RAM by 50% and adding a HDD causing a power supply overload is a reasonable expectation. Agreed. HDDs (especially 10k) can cause a heavy motor-start load on the 12V but should otherwise be fine. One problem with big OEMs is they are also aiming at EPA EnergyStar targets which cause them to tight-size PSUs for max efficiency. The German TuV may also have powerfactor targets. Energy efficiency is the new wild card. It's the only consideration I can imagine that would justify cutting it so close. Something else about this machine that is shaved very close is the thermal design. It will not run for long with the side cover removed. That wouldn't surprise me if the side cover included a duct, but there are only holes strategically placed in the side panel. The CPU has an enormous heat sink, but no fan of its own! There is your clue, no CPU fan -- the cover is a duct. With the cover off, air can bypass the CPU heatsink and slip straight to [from] the PSU fan. I've built machines without CPU fans, and you have to be very careful about airflow. It's misleading for me to say that the CPU has no fan. The case fan draws air in such a way that the predominant flow is through the many horizontally stacked, spaced plates of the heat sink. It wouldn't seem that it would matter so much where the air comes from, but apparently it does. The heat sink stack is so tall it extends nearly to the edge of the case, so that air entering through the side holes (highly turbulent because it is a collection of small jets) encounters the top of the heat sink almost immediately. I suspect that those holes behave more like vorticity generators than like a duct. Take the cover off, and the relatively laminar flow through the heat sink doesn't create enough heat transfer. Robert. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Robert Myers wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote: Robert Myers wrote: DIMM slots 0 and 2 had been installed correctly and the "upgrade" was installed to slot 3. I would expect that to pass smoke test, then, incorrectly installed as in not full speed rather than upside down or something, I'm actually surprised that it didn't show up working on POST and only be obvious with the cover off or using dmidecode. Or whatever the Windows tool is to get the same information. I would have expected it to boot, too, but it didn't. I tried to boot before opening the machine. It's been long enough that I don't remember if it got past a power-on POST and stopped at a blank screen. Maybe that would have constituted passing a smoke test. I can understand why a tester in a hurry wouldn't want to wait for Vista to boot. Since I intended to add memory, I didn't hesitate to take the cover off to see what was going on. Making what I thought would be a correct memory install fixed the problem. Glad you like it, I have been thinking of a 930 for a KVM server, drop in 12GB of RAM and 4TB of cheap disk and put all the boring little 512m servers on Earth on it. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Robert Myers wrote:
Robert Redelmeier wrote: In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part: I had previously noted the puniness of power supplies on OEM boxes, but not by overloading them to the point where the machine wouldn't run. I don't think that upping the RAM by 50% and adding a HDD causing a power supply overload is a reasonable expectation. Agreed. HDDs (especially 10k) can cause a heavy motor-start load on the 12V but should otherwise be fine. One problem with big OEMs is they are also aiming at EPA EnergyStar targets which cause them to tight-size PSUs for max efficiency. The German TuV may also have powerfactor targets. Energy efficiency is the new wild card. It's the only consideration I can imagine that would justify cutting it so close. Something else about this machine that is shaved very close is the thermal design. It will not run for long with the side cover removed. That wouldn't surprise me if the side cover included a duct, but there are only holes strategically placed in the side panel. The CPU has an enormous heat sink, but no fan of its own! There is your clue, no CPU fan -- the cover is a duct. With the cover off, air can bypass the CPU heatsink and slip straight to [from] the PSU fan. I've built machines without CPU fans, and you have to be very careful about airflow. It's misleading for me to say that the CPU has no fan. The case fan draws air in such a way that the predominant flow is through the many horizontally stacked, spaced plates of the heat sink. It wouldn't seem that it would matter so much where the air comes from, but apparently it does. The heat sink stack is so tall it extends nearly to the edge of the case, so that air entering through the side holes (highly turbulent because it is a collection of small jets) encounters the top of the heat sink almost immediately. I suspect that those holes behave more like vorticity generators than like a duct. Take the cover off, and the relatively laminar flow through the heat sink doesn't create enough heat transfer. Possible, but I think having the coolest outside air coming to the CPU first is probably the key. My problem has been running high ambient temperatures. With a 90F building temp keeping CPU and disk cool is an issue. I looked for a Peltier cooler, but didn't come up with one I really liked. And they draw a ton of power. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Robert Myers wrote: It's misleading for me to say that the CPU has no fan. The case fan draws air in such a way that the predominant flow is through the many horizontally stacked, spaced plates of the heat sink. It wouldn't seem that it would matter so much where the air comes from, but apparently it does. The heat sink stack is so tall it extends nearly to the edge of the case, so that air entering through the side holes (highly turbulent because it is a collection of small jets) encounters the top of the heat sink almost immediately. I suspect that those holes behave more like vorticity generators than like a duct. Take the cover off, and the relatively laminar flow through the heat sink doesn't create enough heat transfer. Possible, but I think having the coolest outside air coming to the CPU first is probably the key. The short circuit to the air flow with the cover off is just a few inches between the heat sink stack and the exhausting case fan, which exhausts much greater heat than the power supply. A piece of cardboard or plastic that blocked that short circuit would be an interesting test. There are actually holes upstream of the CPU to cool the disk drive, and that air has to get through/around the CPU heat sink to exit the case. My problem has been running high ambient temperatures. With a 90F building temp keeping CPU and disk cool is an issue. I looked for a Peltier cooler, but didn't come up with one I really liked. And they draw a ton of power. These boxes have run without air conditioning in summer weather. I don't think 90F ambient should be a problem. Robert. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Robert Myers wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote: Robert Myers wrote: It's misleading for me to say that the CPU has no fan. The case fan draws air in such a way that the predominant flow is through the many horizontally stacked, spaced plates of the heat sink. It wouldn't seem that it would matter so much where the air comes from, but apparently it does. The heat sink stack is so tall it extends nearly to the edge of the case, so that air entering through the side holes (highly turbulent because it is a collection of small jets) encounters the top of the heat sink almost immediately. I suspect that those holes behave more like vorticity generators than like a duct. Take the cover off, and the relatively laminar flow through the heat sink doesn't create enough heat transfer. Possible, but I think having the coolest outside air coming to the CPU first is probably the key. The short circuit to the air flow with the cover off is just a few inches between the heat sink stack and the exhausting case fan, which exhausts much greater heat than the power supply. A piece of cardboard or plastic that blocked that short circuit would be an interesting test. There are actually holes upstream of the CPU to cool the disk drive, and that air has to get through/around the CPU heat sink to exit the case. My problem has been running high ambient temperatures. With a 90F building temp keeping CPU and disk cool is an issue. I looked for a Peltier cooler, but didn't come up with one I really liked. And they draw a ton of power. These boxes have run without air conditioning in summer weather. I don't think 90F ambient should be a problem. Now that I look, this system seems to have hit 52C air temp last August. That's air, not components. That sound right for four servers in a room, 102F temp outside, pulling in "cooling" air with a window fan over a hot black roof in full sunlight. As the song says, "Somethin' Got to be Arranged." Google says systems can run hotter, several have been up for 400+ days, so maybe they're right. Hope so. :-( |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part:
Energy efficiency is the new wild card. It's the only consideration I can imagine that would justify cutting it so close. Older problems, but perhaps related/continuing: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/te...gy/29dell.html -- Robert R |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert Myers wrote in part: Energy efficiency is the new wild card. It's the only consideration I can imagine that would justify cutting it so close. Older problems, but perhaps related/continuing: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/te...gy/29dell.html A long time before Dell's customer service problems and practices began to get public attention, I had a long go-round with them that told me everything I needed to know about the corporate culture there. I even wrote about it in one of these forums, and Felger Carbon defended Dell as not being the bottom-feeder I characterized it as being. I suspect the (still unidentified) company that built the box causing the current problem was the company that he would have claimed was the bottom feeder. When I finally wrestled Dell to the mat, it turned out that there were six hundred people ahead of me for the replacement part needed (so I had to wait another six months for it), and the customer service rep had to consult a manager before finally agreeing with me that there was something wrong with the hardware, which manifested itself as a clear data-corruption problem. The story reported in the New York Times sounds very similar. While it was still in the PC business, no IBM alum would ever comment on the competitive landscape it faced in that market. As I infer the corporate culture at IBM as it once was, they probably believed that their corporate customers would wise up and stop buying the kind of junk that was being sold at rock-bottom prices. History, of course, proved otherwise. As Yousuf pointed out earlier, it's quite a challenge to build a box at a price that's competitive with what you can get from an OEM, and, even then, although you know exactly who provided each part (at least in theory), you can still wind up with a motherboard that becomes notorious for having been built with bad capacitors. If I had to finger a culprit here, I'd point at the business schools, which seem to be so detached from reality that they actually think that anything that looks good on a spreadsheet is a good business practice. That anyone ever would have admired Dell just boggles my mind, just as it boggles my mind that people *still* don't get why we are so much poorer now than we were a few years ago. That is to say that, although the PC business is cut-throat in a way that ultimately puts customers at risk, it is not a problem that is peculiar to PC OEM's. Robert. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
On 6/29/2010 11:38 PM, Robert Redelmeier wrote:
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips Robert wrote in part: Energy efficiency is the new wild card. It's the only consideration I can imagine that would justify cutting it so close. Older problems, but perhaps related/continuing: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/te...gy/29dell.html Quite the come down for a company which was a model taught at the Harvard business school. But in reality, even back when it was a business darling, people knew they were sitting on a slippery slope. It's real business model lay in the taking of subsidies from bigger companies that acted as its sugar daddy. Yousuf Khan |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Marginal OEM Power Supply
On Jun 22, 4:31*pm, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Glad you like it, I have been thinking of a 930 for a KVM server, drop in 12GB of RAM and 4TB of cheap disk and put all the boring little 512m servers on Earth on it. Everything now goes through this 64-bit Windows desktop, including a virtual 64-bit Fedora 13 and a virtual 32-bit Windows XP Professional, with a Cygwin X-server handling graphical output from other Linux boxes. The virtualized machines, both Windows and Linux running simultaneously, are at least as snappy as Windows and Linux running on E8200 and E8400 Core 2 Duo. I wish someone made affordable 4Gb DDR3 non-ECC, since memory is the only thing that is ever remotely in short supply. The virtualized XP Professional will allow me to decommission a separate box running XP just to support a handful of legacy XP programs. Robert. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
power supply on new build w old power supply | ed jurewicz | Homebuilt PC's | 1 | December 19th 07 01:26 PM |
Any LOW power desktops with external wall wart power supply? | [email protected] | Homebuilt PC's | 14 | June 2nd 06 02:29 AM |
Antec TPII 550EPS12V or Cooler Master Real Power 550 power supply??? | brian | Homebuilt PC's | 7 | May 6th 05 07:56 AM |
Antec TPII 550EPS12V or Cooler Master Real Power 550 power supply??? | brian | Overclocking | 6 | May 5th 05 12:21 PM |
A marginal Samsung problem | r wiley | Printers | 1 | December 28th 03 02:29 AM |