If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
power supply damaged even with ups ???????????
"graxtax" wrote in message
news:335766_f965e531b8a5b5bdae9e6c42721e80ae@hardw areforumz.com... here is my problem, i run my new pc with a ups 800 VA, power supply 480 watt, ’lc power scorpio’ but even with that after 3months it is dead !!!!! fortunately my pc is ok, i got replaced the psu, ok, but my concern is : whom foult it was ? the ups that allowed some strange signal to pass to the psu or the psu itself was so poor? i took it 95 euro !!!! the strange thing is that the psu didn’t ’die’ during the time that pc was on, but one morning that i tried to switch it on, it did never switch on until i replaced the psu. until that moment i never had even small problems with my pc. my pc is p4 3ghz s775, mobo asus p5gd1 pro, vga ati x300 pci-e, ram 1024, 1hdd sata,1tv card,and 1printer, lg lcd display, i put in ups only the pc and the monitor lcd. -- Posted using the http://www.hardwareforumz.com interface, at author's request Articles individually checked for conformance to usenet standards Topic URL: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/power-...pict67113.html Visit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.hardwareforumz.com/eform.php?p=335766 Unless the UPS incorporates surge protection (and you properly connect your hardware), it is only a UPS - *uninterruptible* power supply, which has nothing to do with surge protection. I have a huge 2kVA UPS with a 60-pound isolation transformer that also protects the ground circuit. Most consumer-grade UPS'es have no surge protection. You use those for *data* protection (regarding up-time and prevention of catastrophic system crash causing data corruption). Consumer-grade UPS'es do NOT provide for hardware protection. The best would be to install surge protection at the entry point for power into your house (i.e., a whole-home surge arrestor). Unless it has a means of monitoring itself, you won't know when it fails. Every surge stresses the protector until it eventually fails. If you use an end-point surge protection, like the type you plug into a wall outlet, use only ONE for all your computer equipment (and also for any equipment you connect to your computer). Two surge protectors plugged into the same double wall outlet probably each have a 6-foot cord. That means there is 12 feet of cord between them resulting in a high-voltage impedance than can cause a differential of 400V, or more, between the two surge protectors during a surge. If you connect any other equipment to your computer (phone cable to modem, stereo to audio jacks) then having each component on a different surge protector can result in a differential between them that is also experienced as a surge. Put all the interconnected equipment upstream of the SAME surge protector. For a modem, use a surge protector with built-in phone surge protection (so the surge release at the phone protector is very close to the input side of the power surge protection. Don't go stringing a bunch of surge protectors from every wall outlet and then end up connecting equipment on one surge protector across to equipment on another surge protector (unless that other surge protector is upstream of the first one, in which case you don't need to waste the money on a surge strip and just use a power strip). Most of the consumer-grade surge protectors don't seem to afford much protection plus you don't know when it has failed. I'm still on the fence regarding surge protectors (that shunt the surge) and surge suppressors (that absorb the surge and dissipate it slowly); see http://snipurl.com/l622 and http://www.zerosurge.com/HTML/about.html. It seems the suppressors would not incur the problems of parallel protectors separated by some distance where the shunted surge across the distance between the protectors and the impedance therein ends up itself being a surge. Rather than shunt it and hope it goes elsewhere, suck it in and clamp it down. But then if you arrest it an the point-of-entry then it isn't inside the house to deal with (typically with consumers using cheap power strips claiming to provide surge protection). Since w_tom is a regular here, hopefully he will chime in, too. Despite any disagreement between us, it is always good to get varied on-topic viewpoints. You might want to ping him for his opinion (get ready for him rolling his eyes when asking why a UPS didn't stop a surge). Check his other posts regarding surges (http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...rt=0&scoring=d). Regarding failure of the PSU, they die early (premature death) or they die late. When new, they may be weak or have a defect that causes failure which is often exhibited within a month or two. If they survive a couple months, they'll last a long time, like years, and then die. Also goes for other components: a hard drive fails early or it lasts for years, a memory stick dies immediately or soon or it lasts for years, and so on. The warranty really only gets used for premature death; otherwise, the product usually lasts longer than the warranty (so when it dies later then you have no warranty). Since your UPS probably does nothing regarding surge protection or suppresion, anything after the UPS can still get fried by a surge. *Good* computer switching power supplies are pretty resistant to surges but then, of course, I'm not experienced with the real cheapy units. If I get stuck with a case with a low-grade PSU, out it goes to get replaced. It is the blood supply of your electronic computer and is not a part where you want to go cheap. At 95 Euro (~$113 USD), it wasn't priced cheap. "it is dead" really doesn't say anything intelligible about the condition of PSU. Could be it refuses to accept any input power, like from a blown fuse or snapped breaker. Could be it comes up but goes down in a short time because of excessive heat. Could be some or all taps have no voltage. Could be there is a reduction in the output capacity of a tap or shared taps which results in flaky equipment operation. Could be something is sucking out so many amps that voltage regulation is extremely poor. Could be some circuitry fried so the ripple is too huge. Could be just the fan stopped spinning but the supply works okay; however, it might check fan speed to stop itself if the fan doesn't spin (fans are moving parts and fail more quickly). I've never heard of LC Power (http://www.lc-power.com/) before now but then maybe they have no distributors in my country (rather than list their distributors, they make you go clicking around on a map hunting for distributors, and none of the countries shown in their map is mine). When you read the spec decal they show (http://www.lc-power.com/htm/products..._id=21&a_id=67), the total power would be 739.7 watts. They neglect to mention which are common railed outputs that would limit each other for amperage output. I didn't see any downloads for a manual that might explain in there what you can really get out from each tap and which taps are dependent. From 740 down to 480 watts, there definitely is some dependency between taps. They don't mention if 480W is the maximum at failure or a suggested maximum but that there is still room for overage (i.e., you can safely go above 480W). "Our manufacturing facilities are located in Shenzhen, China". Might be their plant, or might be whomever they contract from where to buy the PSUs on which they slap their brand sticker. Maybe kony or someone else here has some experience with this brand. BTW: Could you ask your forum admin to reduce the size of the signature they tack onto posts that they migrate from their forum to Usenet using their gateway? Just tell us the post came through their Usenet gateway, don't bother telling us about its attempt to conform to standards, don't bother with an abuse URL (the X-Complaints-To header already notes that, and probably should be changed if not correct), and don't bother showing the forum URLs to the original post because we in Usenet are not going to bother web browsing over to your forum. -- __________________________________________________ _____ ** Post replies to the newsgroup. Share with others. ** For e-mail, remove "NIX" and append "#VC811" to Subject. __________________________________________________ _____ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
power supply damaged even with ups ???????????
Surge protection adjacent to a power supply would already be
inside that power supply. So why did that power supply fail? Just too common is that a power supply failed; therefore it must be a surge. Meanwhile best evidence is that dead supply. Without details - such as what has specifically failed - then a human has no idea what caused that damage. I have yet to see a supply damaged by surge. Seen numerous supplies with component failure typical of manufacturing defects. Learning is why we repair supplies. For example, a recent supply accused of failing due to power on was, instead, found to have its +5VSB power supply damaged. Power on would have no effect because this part of a power supply is always on. In another failure blamed on transients, failure was actually due to a failed pullup resistor. A problem so difficult to find that I literally removed and individually tested every other component until I finally discovered that resistor. Clearly something only done to learn - not to save money. But again, this part failed on its own. The part may have failed during normal operation. But since its function was only for power up restarts, then the failure was not observed until the power supply was power cycled. And yet some would immediately blame surges from power cycling - because they did not first obtain facts. (BTW, same kind of resistor failure is why electrolytic capacitors are routinely shorted before touching with a hand. In one supply, a 'bleed off' resistor failed so that one electrolytic capacitor remain fully charged - hazardous to human hands. Again, a failure in normal operation that could have cause a human to suffer surge damage. The point being that part do fail often not because of surges.) In another failure, a switching transistor failed. In this case, about 30 same power supplies were connected and running from same electrical source. But only this one power transistor failed - again an internal or manufacturing defect unique to that one supply. Another example of a failure that some elsewhere would have blamed on surges. Again, the only reason for repairing it was to learn why a failure happened. And again, not due to AC line transients. If a power supply is damaged by transients, then damage would more likely appear in places where a surge would be most destructive such as in line filter, diode bridge, or electrolytic capacitors. Too often, a failed power supply has no damage in its power input section. Therefore failure is not due to external transients. Furthermore, a transient requires an output path before damage could happen. One path it will not use is through galvanic isolation required in all power supplies and rated at typically thousands of volts. Yes, power supplies also have significant galvanic isolation; just another part of internal protection. So what damaged a supply? More often due to internal or manufacturing defects. Computer grade UPSes connect AC mains directly to computer when not in battery backup mode. So where is that UPS protection anyway? Protection that was going to protect a computer is already inside its power supply. If power supply has failed, no one can say accurately until a failed internal component has been identified - the autopsy of the best evidence - the dead body. I can not remember the last time a power supply was identified failed due to surges. Have seen some where components were suspiciously too marginal meaning that a certain percentage would always fail in normal operation - maybe even months or years later. And yet many will blame a surge for conditions more likely attributed to marginal components or manufacturing defects. Of course a UPS may have "allowed some strange signal to pass to the psu". Computer grade UPSes don't even claim to stop, block, or absorb such transients. But long before one can suggest what caused the failure, one must first identify its failed component and building wide circuit that would have caused that damage. Was the 480 watt supply really only 250 watts or not capable of outputting sufficient power on one voltage? These are other possibilities when one does not first trace down a specific reason for each power supply failure. One who fixes things by shotgunning would never learn these useful lessons about why things fail. Vanguard wrote: "graxtax" wrote in message news:335766_f965e531b8a5b5bdae9e6c42721e80ae@hardw areforumz.com... here is my problem, i run my new pc with a ups 800 VA, power supply 480 watt, ’lc power scorpio’ but even with that after 3months it is dead !!!!! fortunately my pc is ok, i got replaced the psu, ok, but my concern is: whom foult it was ? the ups that allowed some strange signal to pass to the psu or the psu itself was so poor? i took it 95 euro !!!! the strange thing is that the psu didn’t ’die’ during the time that pc was on, but one morning that i tried to switch it on, it did never switch on until i replaced the psu. until that moment i never had even small problems with my pc. my pc is p4 3ghz s775, mobo asus p5gd1 pro, vga ati x300 pci-e, ram 1024, 1hdd sata,1tv card,and 1printer, lg lcd display, i put in ups only the pc and the monitor lcd. ... Unless the UPS incorporates surge protection (and you properly connect your hardware), it is only a UPS - *uninterruptible* power supply, which has nothing to do with surge protection. I have a huge 2kVA UPS with a 60-pound isolation transformer that also protects the ground circuit. Most consumer-grade UPS'es have no surge protection. You use those for *data* protection (regarding up-time and prevention of catastrophic system crash causing data corruption). Consumer-grade UPS'es do NOT provide for hardware protection. The best would be to install surge protection at the entry point for power into your house (i.e., a whole-home surge arrestor). Unless it has a means of monitoring itself, you won't know when it fails. Every surge stresses the protector until it eventually fails. If you use an end-point surge protection, like the type you plug into a wall outlet, use only ONE for all your computer equipment (and also for any equipment you connect to your computer). Two surge protectors plugged into the same double wall outlet probably each have a 6-foot cord. That means there is 12 feet of cord between them resulting in a high-voltage impedance than can cause a differential of 400V, or more, between the two surge protectors during a surge. If you connect any other equipment to your computer (phone cable to modem, stereo to audio jacks) then having each component on a different surge protector can result in a differential between them that is also experienced as a surge. Put all the interconnected equipment upstream of the SAME surge protector. For a modem, use a surge protector with built-in phone surge protection (so the surge release at the phone protector is very close to the input side of the power surge protection. Don't go stringing a bunch of surge protectors from every wall outlet and then end up connecting equipment on one surge protector across to equipment on another surge protector (unless that other surge protector is upstream of the first one, in which case you don't need to waste the money on a surge strip and just use a power strip). Most of the consumer-grade surge protectors don't seem to afford much protection plus you don't know when it has failed. I'm still on the fence regarding surge protectors (that shunt the surge) and surge suppressors (that absorb the surge and dissipate it slowly); see http://snipurl.com/l622 and http://www.zerosurge.com/HTML/about.html. It seems the suppressors would not incur the problems of parallel protectors separated by some distance where the shunted surge across the distance between the protectors and the impedance therein ends up itself being a surge. Rather than shunt it and hope it goes elsewhere, suck it in and clamp it down. But then if you arrest it an the point-of-entry then it isn't inside the house to deal with (typically with consumers using cheap power strips claiming to provide surge protection). Since w_tom is a regular here, hopefully he will chime in, too. Despite any disagreement between us, it is always good to get varied on-topic viewpoints. You might want to ping him for his opinion (get ready for him rolling his eyes when asking why a UPS didn't stop a surge). Check his other posts regarding surges (http://groups.google.com/groups?q=au...rt=0&scoring=d). Regarding failure of the PSU, they die early (premature death) or they die late. When new, they may be weak or have a defect that causes failure which is often exhibited within a month or two. If they survive a couple months, they'll last a long time, like years, and then die. Also goes for other components: a hard drive fails early or it lasts for years, a memory stick dies immediately or soon or it lasts for years, and so on. The warranty really only gets used for premature death; otherwise, the product usually lasts longer than the warranty (so when it dies later then you have no warranty). Since your UPS probably does nothing regarding surge protection or suppresion, anything after the UPS can still get fried by a surge. *Good* computer switching power supplies are pretty resistant to surges but then, of course, I'm not experienced with the real cheapy units. If I get stuck with a case with a low-grade PSU, out it goes to get replaced. It is the blood supply of your electronic computer and is not a part where you want to go cheap. At 95 Euro (~$113 USD), it wasn't priced cheap. "it is dead" really doesn't say anything intelligible about the condition of PSU. Could be it refuses to accept any input power, like from a blown fuse or snapped breaker. Could be it comes up but goes down in a short time because of excessive heat. Could be some or all taps have no voltage. Could be there is a reduction in the output capacity of a tap or shared taps which results in flaky equipment operation. Could be something is sucking out so many amps that voltage regulation is extremely poor. Could be some circuitry fried so the ripple is too huge. Could be just the fan stopped spinning but the supply works okay; however, it might check fan speed to stop itself if the fan doesn't spin (fans are moving parts and fail more quickly). I've never heard of LC Power (http://www.lc-power.com/) before now but then maybe they have no distributors in my country (rather than list their distributors, they make you go clicking around on a map hunting for distributors, and none of the countries shown in their map is mine). When you read the spec decal they show (http://www.lc-power.com/htm/products..._id=21&a_id=67), the total power would be 739.7 watts. They neglect to mention which are common railed outputs that would limit each other for amperage output. I didn't see any downloads for a manual that might explain in there what you can really get out from each tap and which taps are dependent. From 740 down to 480 watts, there definitely is some dependency between taps. They don't mention if 480W is the maximum at failure or a suggested maximum but that there is still room for overage (i.e., you can safely go above 480W). "Our manufacturing facilities are located in Shenzhen, China". Might be their plant, or might be whomever they contract from where to buy the PSUs on which they slap their brand sticker. Maybe kony or someone else here has some experience with this brand. ... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Power Supply keep blowing | Blue Rival | Homebuilt PC's | 23 | January 3rd 06 01:49 AM |
power supply damaged even with ups ??????????? | kony | General | 0 | December 30th 05 06:59 AM |
Wise to use HDD as offline storage? | Columbus | Storage (alternative) | 76 | August 26th 05 10:43 PM |
Motherboard Power Requirements | arifi | Asus Motherboards | 27 | February 24th 05 11:31 AM |
Maxtor 120 GB HD clicks constantly on Intel CA810EAL system when all by itself | Rod Speed | Storage (alternative) | 1 | April 5th 04 07:24 PM |