If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Gigabyte GA-8KNXP and Promise SX4000 RAID Controller
Having read, and experienced, the lackluster performance of the GigaRAID
with 2 Maxtor 160 GB hard drives in RAID 0, I installed a Promise SX4000 RAID controller with 4 Maxtor 160 GB hard drives in RAID 0 on my Gigabyte GA-8KNXP motherboard. First, under Windows XP, it has worked well over the past 7 days, 24 hours a day. No BSODs at all, but then, I am not overclocking (yet). I tested RAID 0 and RAID 5 configurations with all types of cluster and striping sizes, and settled on 32 KB clusters and 32 KB striping. I used HD Tach, DiskSPeed32 and AIDA. I also read all types of Internet reviews on the SX4000 in different configurations. I settled on this configuration because (1) I was looking for overall best performance balance between disk reads and writes and (2) I backup regularly (so RAID 5 redundancy was less an issue compared to RAID 0). In my early testing, I quickly dropped RAID 5 for RAID 0, because of the difference in write performance. For a RAID configuration of 16 KB striped and 64 KB clusters, using the Random Write test of AIDA32, the average throughput for RAID 5 was 10.1 MB/s, vs 52.1 MB/s for RAID 0. Changing to 64 KB striped and 64 KB clusters yielded 10.0 MB/s for RAID 5, but RAID 0 dropped to 38.5 MB/s. CPU utilization was about the same for all RAID configurations. It should be noted that I am using 256 MB of buffer memory on the Promise SX4000. 4 Maxtor drives were used in all RAID configurations, of course, RAID 5 used the 4th drive for parity. In general, read performance of the RAID 5 was 30% slower than the RAID 0 - again, probably due to having only 3 hard drives for data verses 4 for RAID 0. I also did RAID 0 single configuration test with a single drive, to explore performance against a single drive with the other RAID configurations. In summary, against the RAID 5, the write speed was the same, but the RAID 5 read speed was doubled. These results would follow popular thinking about performance between RAID 0 and RAID 5. For those following this thread, I can't emphasize that there is no fault tolerance in RAID 0 - one drive dies, all data is than loss. Therefore, religious adherence to backup is a must! Over the years, I have had considerable experience with SCSI RAID systems at work. At home, on a limited budget, an IDE based RAID system, such as the Promise SX4000 and possibly other manufacturer's IDE RAIDs, is a cost effective approach for RAID performance. I'll check back here regularly to answer any questions - as best as I can. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GA-8KNXP and RAID Card | rodeoislander | Gigabyte Motherboards | 1 | August 19th 03 10:21 PM |