If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Samsung QVC
Formatted it for a single logical partition, and transferred a couple of files. Not initially impressive, and considerably slower than expected for comparable SATA, though smaller, 256G SSD drives that do well enough for a third faster. Including another but better Samsung EVO non-Pro series, both similarly sized, as the QVC, at 1T. Shouldn't be much longer and I'll have ready additionally material to supplement a temporary HP 256G, almost filled, where the QVC is intended. Three older mechanical 1T drives kept in reserve and largely unused, failed miserably for extended usage, as they're unstable if at best marginally even suited for continued "shelf storage" units able to power themselves up. I'll know then, over a 300G transfer session, what the QVC thruput is capable to sustain. Not at any critical juncture, as it'll serve largely for a read application, by far and below from a 500 minimal cycled redundancy rewrite capacity it's rated. However, the QVC price was the same as the EVO purchased on a sale. And whereas the EVO may range now from 25-50% at an additional cost premium, that 25%, possibly lower, becomes increasingly a token of speed benefits rated for 5 or 6 times higher for write redundancy. Of course for simply everyone things do always seem to fly ecstatically along, if faster than believable, at least on review benchmarks they're thrilled to post. DRAM caching, possibly not and withstanding, I'll settle for hypothetical long-term storage security, over the three unreliable mechanical HDDs. I don't see the reason to call Samsung and question their quality control for questionable QVC speeds, if and sustainability quite skewed apart from the EVO model, when I bought the QVC on principle for quality assurances. Doubtful or not, I expect to know upon moving 300G data off the HP SSD unit, whether might that occur over closer to 15 or longer by 30 minutes. (With a fan: unfortunately the HP's partiality is to overhead at 130F, at which juncture the apparently design is to drop read transfer thruputs by half;- haven't run it hot on writes yet. The thought of turning the HP into alternative design usages, from new and cheap USB2/3 SDD adaptors, is certainly among reasonable allowance to adopt it for a stepchild.) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Samsung CLP-510 | master lee | Printers | 0 | May 27th 11 03:53 PM |
samsung 173 P+ | Micha³ Rybiński | General Hardware | 0 | October 4th 06 10:40 AM |
17" Samsung LCD | Burt McGillicutty | General | 0 | October 27th 04 04:23 PM |
Samsung CLP-500 | Timothy Lee | Printers | 0 | August 10th 04 03:39 PM |
Where to buy Samsung SN-308?? | Brian Reynolds | Dell Computers | 1 | December 23rd 03 09:45 PM |