If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
DSL modem uncapping?
Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ...
"John L" wrote in message news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84... Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem? Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort. This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too. -- Michael Brown www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so, this whole
topic is moot. Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed. Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us americans, ........yet. Sorry. Had SBC (when they were SWBell) for 1.5yrs, 2 blocks from CO (worked fine, nice speed, too bad their upstream providers suck ass). Had RoadRunner for 1.5yrs. I'm going back to cable. - Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ... "John L" wrote in message news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84... Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem? Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort. This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too. -- Strontium "It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Strontium" wrote in message
... Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ... "John L" wrote in message news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84... Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem? Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort. This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too. The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so, this whole topic is moot. Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed. Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us americans, ........yet. We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it? -- Michael Brown www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
- Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "Strontium" wrote in message ... Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ... "John L" wrote in message news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84... Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem? Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort. This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too. The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so, this whole topic is moot. Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed. Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us americans, ........yet. We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it? I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain node, or even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno though. Anyway, 2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me -- Strontium "It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Cable modems operate by downloading a CONFIG file from a TFTP server which
has the limits described in the file. It is very possible to hack a cable modem and it has been done, and the cable company DOES catch you eventually. "Strontium" wrote in message news - Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "Strontium" wrote in message ... Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ... "John L" wrote in message news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84... Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem? Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort. This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too. The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so, this whole topic is moot. Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed. Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us americans, ........yet. We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it? I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain node, or even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno though. Anyway, 2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me -- Strontium "It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Depends on the cable company. As far as xDSL goes, not gonna happen. It's
done at the DSLAM. - uncooked meat prior to state vector collapse stood up at show-n-tell, in KU7hb.61117$Ms2.29349@fed1read03, and said: Cable modems operate by downloading a CONFIG file from a TFTP server which has the limits described in the file. It is very possible to hack a cable modem and it has been done, and the cable company DOES catch you eventually. "Strontium" wrote in message news - Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "Strontium" wrote in message ... Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ... "John L" wrote in message news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84... Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem? Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort. This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too. The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so, this whole topic is moot. Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed. Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us americans, ........yet. We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it? I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain node, or even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno though. Anyway, 2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me -- Strontium "It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit -- Strontium "It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Strontium" wrote in message ... uncooked meat prior to state vector collapse stood up at show-n-tell, in KU7hb.61117$Ms2.29349@fed1read03, and said: "Strontium" wrote in message news - Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "Strontium" wrote in message ... Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ... "John L" wrote in message news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84... Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem? Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort. This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too. The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so, this whole topic is moot. Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed. Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us americans, ........yet. We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it? I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain node, or even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno though. Anyway, 2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me Cable modems operate by downloading a CONFIG file from a TFTP server which has the limits described in the file. It is very possible to hack a cable modem and it has been done, and the cable company DOES catch you eventually. Depends on the cable company. As far as xDSL goes, not gonna happen. It's done at the DSLAM. Remember DSL != cable ... DSL = dedicated line, cable = shared (no DSLAM by definition: DSLAM = DSL access multiplexer IIRC), so unless they did traffic shaping on the router then I don't see how they can control an individual connection without help from the modem. -- Michael Brown www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
- Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "Strontium" wrote in message ... uncooked meat prior to state vector collapse stood up at show-n-tell, in KU7hb.61117$Ms2.29349@fed1read03, and said: "Strontium" wrote in message news - Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "Strontium" wrote in message ... Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ... "John L" wrote in message news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84... Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem? Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort. This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too. The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so, this whole topic is moot. Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed. Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us americans, ........yet. We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it? I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain node, or even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno though. Anyway, 2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me Cable modems operate by downloading a CONFIG file from a TFTP server which has the limits described in the file. It is very possible to hack a cable modem and it has been done, and the cable company DOES catch you eventually. Depends on the cable company. As far as xDSL goes, not gonna happen. It's done at the DSLAM. Remember DSL != cable ... DSL = dedicated line, cable = shared (no DSLAM by definition: DSLAM = DSL access multiplexer IIRC), so unless they did traffic shaping on the router then I don't see how they can control an individual connection without help from the modem. However you wish to define xDSL, that's fine. It's fine, in theory. However, what is theory (as we all should know), is not always what is in practice. Your 'definition' says to me that my xDSL provider was not able to cap me at 1.5Mbps. But, my experience speaks otherwise. Had them, for 1.5yrs TYVM. Also, had Cable, for 1.5yrs. Cable is 'possible' to hack through the modem. xDSL... sorry buddy. You're grasping at straws, there. Take my comments, with a grain of salt. But, I've been there, have the T-shirt. Nice text book, though. Might make a good professor, spouting that crap (wait, are you one?. hasta la beers blah -- Strontium "It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Strontium" wrote in message
... - Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "Strontium" wrote in message ... uncooked meat prior to state vector collapse stood up at show-n-tell, in KU7hb.61117$Ms2.29349@fed1read03, and said: "Strontium" wrote in message news - Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: "Strontium" wrote in message ... Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in , and said: Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ... "John L" wrote in message news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84... Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem? Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort. This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too. The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so, this whole topic is moot. Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed. Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us americans, ........yet. We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it? I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain node, or even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno though. Anyway, 2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me Cable modems operate by downloading a CONFIG file from a TFTP server which has the limits described in the file. It is very possible to hack a cable modem and it has been done, and the cable company DOES catch you eventually. Depends on the cable company. As far as xDSL goes, not gonna happen. It's done at the DSLAM. Remember DSL != cable ... DSL = dedicated line, cable = shared (no DSLAM by definition: DSLAM = DSL access multiplexer IIRC), so unless they did traffic shaping on the router then I don't see how they can control an individual connection without help from the modem. However you wish to define xDSL, that's fine. It's fine, in theory. However, what is theory (as we all should know), is not always what is in practice. Your 'definition' says to me that my xDSL provider was not able to cap me at 1.5Mbps. But, my experience speaks otherwise. Had them, for 1.5yrs TYVM. Also, had Cable, for 1.5yrs. Cable is 'possible' to hack through the modem. xDSL... sorry buddy. You're grasping at straws, there. Take my comments, with a grain of salt. But, I've been there, have the T-shirt. Nice text book, though. Might make a good professor, spouting that crap (wait, are you one?. Ahh, I think there was a communication breakdown By "individual connection" I was referring to one person out of many on a cable, not a "individual connection" as in dedicated DSL connection. DSL connections (as I mentioned earlier) are capped at the DSLAM, which is for all intents and purposes is as you say, unhackable. -- Michael Brown www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need Help Installing HSP56 PRO PCI Modem on ECS L7VMM3 MOBO | [email protected] | General | 8 | June 23rd 04 03:50 AM |
modem problem | minerva nine | General | 9 | May 27th 04 08:11 AM |
Modem - dial tone broken up, but voice ok | Zardoz | General | 1 | January 5th 04 02:06 AM |
Split Cable Modem Line For TV Tuner? | *Vanguard* | General | 3 | November 23rd 03 11:14 PM |
Dial up modem problem | Richard Freeman | General | 21 | September 22nd 03 05:50 AM |