A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » Overclocking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

DSL modem uncapping?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 8th 03, 06:55 AM
John L
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default DSL modem uncapping?

Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem?


  #2  
Old October 8th 03, 07:21 AM
Michael Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ...

"John L" wrote in message
news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84...
Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem?


Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be
uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to a
shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in the
DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only way to
uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module (often requires
physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty
serious/illegal effort.

This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of skill
(though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing the memory of
the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer up to the chip).
You'll almost certainly get caught too.

--
Michael Brown
www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more
Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open


  #3  
Old October 8th 03, 07:39 AM
Strontium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so, this whole
topic is moot.

Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed.

Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the major
metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem hacks do not
defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might be a lucky bastid.
They aren't quite as cynical as us americans, ........yet.


Sorry.

Had SBC (when they were SWBell) for 1.5yrs, 2 blocks from CO (worked fine,
nice speed, too bad their upstream providers suck ass). Had RoadRunner for
1.5yrs. I'm going back to cable.


-
Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ...

"John L" wrote in message
news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84...
Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem?


Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be
uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to
a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in
the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only
way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module
(often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which
would involve pretty serious/illegal effort.

This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of
skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing
the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer
up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too.


--
Strontium

"It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every
now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit


  #4  
Old October 8th 03, 10:22 AM
Michael Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Strontium" wrote in message
...

Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ...

"John L" wrote in message
news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84...
Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem?


Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be
uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared to
a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers in
the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The only
way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM module
(often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I think), which
would involve pretty serious/illegal effort.

This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit of
skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires reflashing
the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer
up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too.


The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so, this

whole
topic is moot.

Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed.

Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the major
metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem hacks do not
defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might be a lucky bastid.
They aren't quite as cynical as us americans, ........yet.


We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup Quite
surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the modem though. Do
you know (roughly) how they do it?

--
Michael Brown
www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more
Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open


  #5  
Old October 8th 03, 05:06 PM
Strontium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


-
Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

"Strontium" wrote in message
...

Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ...

"John L" wrote in message
news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84...
Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem?

Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be
uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared
to
a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers
in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The
only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM
module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I
think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort.

This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit
of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires
reflashing
the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer
up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too.


The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so,
this whole topic is moot.

Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed.

Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the
major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem
hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might
be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us americans,
........yet.


We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup
Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the modem
though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it?


I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain node, or
even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno though. Anyway,
2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me


--
Strontium

"It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every
now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit


  #6  
Old October 9th 03, 08:13 AM
uncooked meat prior to state vector collapse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cable modems operate by downloading a CONFIG file from a TFTP server which
has the limits described in the file. It is very possible to hack a cable
modem and it has been done, and the cable company DOES catch you eventually.


"Strontium" wrote in message
news

-
Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

"Strontium" wrote in message
...

Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ...

"John L" wrote in message
news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84...
Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem?

Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot be
uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as compared
to
a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers
in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The
only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM
module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I
think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort.

This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit
of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires
reflashing
the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a programmer
up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught too.

The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so,
this whole topic is moot.

Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed.

Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the
major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem
hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you might
be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us americans,
........yet.


We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup
Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the modem
though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it?


I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain node, or
even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno though. Anyway,
2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me


--
Strontium

"It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every
now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit




  #7  
Old October 9th 03, 11:23 AM
Strontium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Depends on the cable company. As far as xDSL goes, not gonna happen. It's
done at the DSLAM.

-
uncooked meat prior to state vector collapse stood up at show-n-tell, in
KU7hb.61117$Ms2.29349@fed1read03, and said:

Cable modems operate by downloading a CONFIG file from a TFTP server
which has the limits described in the file. It is very possible to
hack a cable modem and it has been done, and the cable company DOES
catch you eventually.


"Strontium" wrote in message
news

-
Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

"Strontium" wrote in message
...

Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ...

"John L" wrote in message
news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84...
Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem?

Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot
be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as
compared
to
a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers
in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The
only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM
module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I
think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort.

This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit
of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires
reflashing
the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a
programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught
too.

The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so,
this whole topic is moot.

Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed.

Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the
major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem
hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you
might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us
americans, ........yet.

We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup
Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the
modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it?


I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain
node, or even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno
though. Anyway, 2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me


--
Strontium

"It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every
now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit


--
Strontium

"It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every
now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit


  #8  
Old October 9th 03, 12:45 PM
Michael Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default




"Strontium" wrote in message
...
uncooked meat prior to state vector collapse stood up at show-n-tell, in
KU7hb.61117$Ms2.29349@fed1read03, and said:
"Strontium" wrote in message
news

-
Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

"Strontium" wrote in message
...

Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ...

"John L" wrote in message
news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84...
Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL modem?

Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general cannot
be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on it, as
compared
to
a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage measurers
in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their exchanges. The
only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get access to the DSLAM
module (often requires physical access, at least here in NZ I
think), which would involve pretty serious/illegal effort.

This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a bit
of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires
reflashing
the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a
programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught
too.

The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so,
this whole topic is moot.

Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed.

Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in the
major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years. Modem
hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So, you
might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us
americans, ........yet.

We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup
Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the
modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it?

I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain
node, or even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno
though. Anyway, 2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me


Cable modems operate by downloading a CONFIG file from a TFTP server
which has the limits described in the file. It is very possible to
hack a cable modem and it has been done, and the cable company DOES
catch you eventually.


Depends on the cable company. As far as xDSL goes, not gonna happen.

It's
done at the DSLAM.


Remember DSL != cable ... DSL = dedicated line, cable = shared (no DSLAM by
definition: DSLAM = DSL access multiplexer IIRC), so unless they did traffic
shaping on the router then I don't see how they can control an individual
connection without help from the modem.

--
Michael Brown
www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more
Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open


  #9  
Old October 9th 03, 03:40 PM
Strontium
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


-
Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

"Strontium" wrote in message
...
uncooked meat prior to state vector collapse stood up at
show-n-tell, in KU7hb.61117$Ms2.29349@fed1read03, and said:
"Strontium" wrote in message
news
-
Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

"Strontium" wrote in message
...

Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ...

"John L" wrote in message
news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84...
Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL
modem?

Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general
cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on
it, as compared
to
a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage
measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their
exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get
access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at
least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty
serious/illegal effort.

This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a
bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires
reflashing
the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a
programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught
too.

The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so,
this whole topic is moot.

Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed.

Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in
the major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years.
Modem hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So,
you
might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us
americans, ........yet.

We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup
Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the
modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it?

I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain
node, or even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno
though. Anyway, 2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me

Cable modems operate by downloading a CONFIG file from a TFTP server
which has the limits described in the file. It is very possible to
hack a cable modem and it has been done, and the cable company DOES
catch you eventually.


Depends on the cable company. As far as xDSL goes, not gonna
happen. It's done at the DSLAM.


Remember DSL != cable ... DSL = dedicated line, cable = shared (no
DSLAM by definition: DSLAM = DSL access multiplexer IIRC), so unless
they did traffic shaping on the router then I don't see how they can
control an individual connection without help from the modem.


However you wish to define xDSL, that's fine. It's fine, in theory.
However, what is theory (as we all should know), is not always what is in
practice. Your 'definition' says to me that my xDSL provider was not able
to cap me at 1.5Mbps. But, my experience speaks otherwise. Had them, for
1.5yrs TYVM. Also, had Cable, for 1.5yrs. Cable is 'possible' to hack
through the modem. xDSL... sorry buddy. You're grasping at straws, there.
Take my comments, with a grain of salt. But, I've been there, have the
T-shirt. Nice text book, though. Might make a good professor, spouting
that crap (wait, are you one?.

hasta la beers
blah

--
Strontium

"It's no surprise, to me. I am my own worst enemy. `Cause every
now, and then, I kick the livin' **** `outta me." - Lit


  #10  
Old October 10th 03, 06:36 AM
Michael Brown
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Strontium" wrote in message
...

-
Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

"Strontium" wrote in message
...
uncooked meat prior to state vector collapse stood up at
show-n-tell, in KU7hb.61117$Ms2.29349@fed1read03, and said:
"Strontium" wrote in message
news
-
Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

"Strontium" wrote in message
...

Michael Brown stood up at show-n-tell, in
, and said:

Completely off-topic for this newsgroup, but what the heck ...

"John L" wrote in message
news:ZENgb.8296$Sg4.2349@edtnps84...
Can anybody tell me how to uncap a DLINK 300G or 300i DSL
modem?

Dunno about those modems in particular, but DSL in general
cannot be uncapped. Since it's a dedicated line (only you on
it, as compared
to
a shared cable) the Telcos slap the bandwidth/data usage
measurers in the DSLAM, which is something that sits in their
exchanges. The only way to uncap a DSL connection is to get
access to the DSLAM module (often requires physical access, at
least here in NZ I think), which would involve pretty
serious/illegal effort.

This is compared to cable modems, which can be uncapped with a
bit of skill (though in some cases major skill, as it requires
reflashing
the memory of the modem by opening the case and hooking a
programmer up to the chip). You'll almost certainly get caught
too.

The capping is accomplished at the DSLAM (usually, the CO)...so,
this whole topic is moot.

Unless you have a buddy, at your CO, you're screwed.

Hate to tell you, as well, Michael...they are capping Cable in
the major metro areas now. Have been, for quite a few years.
Modem hacks do not defeat it But, you are a kiwi, right? So,
you
might be a lucky bastid. They aren't quite as cynical as us
americans, ........yet.

We don't even have cable internet over here, it's ADSL or dialup
Quite surprised that they can cap cable connections outside the
modem though. Do you know (roughly) how they do it?

I would imagine it's done at some location central to a certain
node, or even at a main hub. Hell, maybe at their routers...dunno
though. Anyway, 2Mbps down/356Kbps up is plenty for me

Cable modems operate by downloading a CONFIG file from a TFTP server
which has the limits described in the file. It is very possible to
hack a cable modem and it has been done, and the cable company DOES
catch you eventually.

Depends on the cable company. As far as xDSL goes, not gonna
happen. It's done at the DSLAM.


Remember DSL != cable ... DSL = dedicated line, cable = shared (no
DSLAM by definition: DSLAM = DSL access multiplexer IIRC), so unless
they did traffic shaping on the router then I don't see how they can
control an individual connection without help from the modem.


However you wish to define xDSL, that's fine. It's fine, in theory.
However, what is theory (as we all should know), is not always what is in
practice. Your 'definition' says to me that my xDSL provider was not

able
to cap me at 1.5Mbps. But, my experience speaks otherwise. Had them, for
1.5yrs TYVM. Also, had Cable, for 1.5yrs. Cable is 'possible' to hack
through the modem. xDSL... sorry buddy. You're grasping at straws,

there.
Take my comments, with a grain of salt. But, I've been there, have the
T-shirt. Nice text book, though. Might make a good professor, spouting
that crap (wait, are you one?.


Ahh, I think there was a communication breakdown By "individual
connection" I was referring to one person out of many on a cable, not a
"individual connection" as in dedicated DSL connection. DSL connections (as
I mentioned earlier) are capped at the DSLAM, which is for all intents and
purposes is as you say, unhackable.

--
Michael Brown
www.emboss.co.nz : OOS/RSI software and more
Add michael@ to emboss.co.nz - My inbox is always open


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Help Installing HSP56 PRO PCI Modem on ECS L7VMM3 MOBO [email protected] General 8 June 23rd 04 03:50 AM
modem problem minerva nine General 9 May 27th 04 08:11 AM
Modem - dial tone broken up, but voice ok Zardoz General 1 January 5th 04 02:06 AM
Split Cable Modem Line For TV Tuner? *Vanguard* General 3 November 23rd 03 11:14 PM
Dial up modem problem Richard Freeman General 21 September 22nd 03 05:50 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.