If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Older chip shoot-out:AMD K2 500MHz vs Intel Celeron 667 MHz processor(Socket 370)
They are in comparable HP Pavillion computers, and while the Intel has an edge with clock speed I think the AMD is beating it in real life responsivness. Am I right? (Besides the AMD based motherboard has three memory sockets vs two for the 'Celery'.) TBerk |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Older chip shoot-out:AMD K2 500MHz vs Intel Celeron 667 MHz processor ?(Socket 370)
TBerk wrote:
They are in comparable HP Pavillion computers, and while the Intel has an edge with clock speed I think the AMD is beating it in real life responsivness. Am I right? (Besides the AMD based motherboard has three memory sockets vs two for the 'Celery'.) Actually, the Celerons of the P2/P3 generation - like the 667mhz one - were pretty good. There is no AMD K2 that I'm aware of - I assume that means K6-2 (although there were, I think, some AMD Athlon [K7] 500mhz chips as well.) The K6-2 was a pretty good chip but really more of a Pentium-MMX generation chip than a P2/P3 generation chip. My bet would be on the Celeron. Now, if by some chance that is a K7/Athlon 500mhz, that probably is at least as fast as the Celeron. -- Nate Edel http://www.cubiclehermit.com/ preferred email | is "nate" at the | "I do have a cause, though. It is obscenity. posting domain | I'm for it." - prologue to "Smut" by Tom Lehrer |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Older chip shoot-out:AMD K2 500MHz vs Intel Celeron 667 MHzprocessor ?(Socket 370)
On May 18, 12:20 pm, (Nate Edel) wrote:
TBerk wrote: They are in comparable HP Pavillion computers, and while the Intel has an edge with clock speed I think the AMD is beating it in real life responsivness. Am I right? (Besides the AMD based motherboard has three memory sockets vs two for the 'Celery'.) Actually, the Celerons of the P2/P3 generation - like the 667mhz one - were pretty good. There is no AMD K2 that I'm aware of - I assume that means K6-2 (although there were, I think, some AMD Athlon [K7] 500mhz chips as well.) The K6-2 was a pretty good chip but really more of a Pentium-MMX generation chip than a P2/P3 generation chip. My bet would be on the Celeron. Now, if by some chance that is a K7/Athlon 500mhz, that probably is at least as fast as the Celeron. -- Nate Edel http://www.cubiclehermit.com/ preferred email | is "nate" at the | "I do have a cause, though. It is obscenity. posting domain | I'm for it." - prologue to "Smut" by Tom Lehrer Alright, Thanks. And you are right, I forgot the '6' there. What I found out since then is less the chips and speed and more the OS; I put Win2k on the AMD system (w/ 256M RAM) and it sat up and barked right past the others, running WinXP. Thx for the reply, TBerk |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Older chip shoot-out:AMD K2 500MHz vs Intel Celeron 667 MHz ?processor ?(Socket 370)
TBerk wrote:
On May 18, 12:20 pm, (Nate Edel) wrote: Actually, the Celerons of the P2/P3 generation - like the 667mhz one - were pretty good. There is no AMD K2 that I'm aware of - I assume that means K6-2 (although there were, I think, some AMD Athlon [K7] 500mhz chips as well.) The K6-2 was a pretty good chip but really more of a Pentium-MMX generation chip than a P2/P3 generation chip. My bet would be on the Celeron. Alright, Thanks. And you are right, I forgot the '6' there. What I found out since then is less the chips and speed and more the OS; I put Win2k on the AMD system (w/ 256M RAM) and it sat up and barked right past the others, running WinXP. XP on 256mb of RAM was a bad idea when it shipped, and it's gotten to be a totally untenable one with various patches (and especially with IE 7 - overall, it's better than 6 and IME a little faster if you've got enough ram, but it's definitely more memory-hungry.) -- Nate Edel http://www.cubiclehermit.com/ preferred email | is "nate" at the | "I do have a cause, though. It is obscenity. posting domain | I'm for it." - prologue to "Smut" by Tom Lehrer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
1.8Ghz Intel Celeron Processor Chip & Heatsink Fan Up for Grabs | Chris Dickens | General Hardware | 0 | December 11th 05 08:41 PM |
? RAM requirements: Celeron D 2.93Ghz Processor. Socket 478 | Sam | Homebuilt PC's | 4 | December 8th 05 06:32 AM |
Safely overclocking a humble 500MHz Celeron | g00n | Overclocking | 4 | September 30th 03 03:46 AM |
Celeron 500MHz running at 6 x 83MHz | Chris Robinson | Overclocking | 5 | September 8th 03 09:38 AM |