If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
WIN 7 Major USB Hardware Incompatibilities ?
On 20 Feb 2010, "Trimble Bracegirdle" wrote in
alt.windows7.general: BUT I have a number of USB Hardware devices that are fine under XP ... THAT MUST FOR ME, WORK ! in Win 7 & won't a USB ADSL MODEM ... a USB DIGITAL TV Box ...A USB SCANNER ...a USB GRAPHIC TABLET .. Scanners are always the first things to be abandoned by driver writers if it doesn't work now, I doubt it ever will. Especially for a 64-bit OS - I think separate drivers are needed, I believe. The hardware manufacturers are responsible for drivers, not Microsoft. I wouldn't call it a a hardware incompatibility, not a "Win 7" incompatibility. I tried Vista out (& did not like it) some time ago, same machine, & these Devices were all OK. But was it 64-bit Vista? If not, I bet these devices wouldn't have worked there, either. A quick web search finds quite a few suggested remedies for similar problems - installing the drivers as Administrator, updating the motherboard chipset driver and/or BIOS, etc. So, there may be a workaround. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
WIN 7 Major USB Hardware Incompatibilities ?
Nil wrote:
On 20 Feb 2010, "Trimble Bracegirdle" wrote in alt.windows7.general: BUT I have a number of USB Hardware devices that are fine under XP ... THAT MUST FOR ME, WORK ! in Win 7 & won't a USB ADSL MODEM ... a USB DIGITAL TV Box ...A USB SCANNER ...a USB GRAPHIC TABLET .. Scanners are always the first things to be abandoned by driver writers if it doesn't work now, I doubt it ever will. Especially for a 64-bit OS - I think separate drivers are needed, I believe. The hardware manufacturers are responsible for drivers, not Microsoft. I wouldn't call it a a hardware incompatibility, not a "Win 7" incompatibility. It's Microsoft's responsibility to make their new OS compatible with the hardware I already have. I'm sure they have a lot of excuses. I don't want excuses. I want my (*(*& hardware to continue to work!!! It may not support new features, but it should do at least what it used to do. Period!!! Microsoft has let us down in that area. Sorry for any inconvenience, my A$$. I tried Vista out (& did not like it) some time ago, same machine, & these Devices were all OK. But was it 64-bit Vista? If not, I bet these devices wouldn't have worked there, either. A quick web search finds quite a few suggested remedies for similar problems - installing the drivers as Administrator, updating the motherboard chipset driver and/or BIOS, etc. So, there may be a workaround. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
WIN 7 Major USB Hardware Incompatibilities ?
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 13:37:03 -0500, SC Tom wrote:
Why do you consider it "crippled"? Not my description! Was used by other W7 users in another forum, probably because various options are missing here and there. -- /\/\aurice (Replace "nomail.afraid" by "bcs" to reply by email) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
WIN 7 Major USB Hardware Incompatibilities ?
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:06:20 +0000, Maurice Batey wrote:
Guess the Boot-US code is trying to do something dodgy... Found nothing relevant in a search on sysinternals.com. Turns out the Boot-US code *was* doing something dodgy. A corrected version now happily writes the diskette. Windows 7 exonerated... -- /\/\aurice (Replace "nomail.afraid" by "bcs" to reply by email) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
WIN 7 Major USB Hardware Incompatibilities ?
mike wrote:
It's Microsoft's responsibility to make their new OS compatible with the hardware I already have. I'm sure they have a lot of excuses. I don't want excuses. I want my (*(*& hardware to continue to work!!! It may not support new features, but it should do at least what it used to do. Period!!! Microsoft has let us down in that area. Sorry for any inconvenience, my A$$. Tell me about it. I've got a perfectly good Epson Perfection Photo 1260 flatbed scanner, and it won't run under Windows 7 x64. No driver for it. Epson can't be bothered writing one, and Microsoft just doesn't care. -Al- |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
WIN 7 Major USB Hardware Incompatibilities ?
Al Smith wrote:
mike wrote: It's Microsoft's responsibility to make their new OS compatible with the hardware I already have. I'm sure they have a lot of excuses. I don't want excuses. I want my (*(*& hardware to continue to work!!! It may not support new features, but it should do at least what it used to do. Period!!! Microsoft has let us down in that area. Sorry for any inconvenience, my A$$. Tell me about it. I've got a perfectly good Epson Perfection Photo 1260 flatbed scanner, and it won't run under Windows 7 x64. No driver for it. Epson can't be bothered writing one, and Microsoft just doesn't care. -Al- Hummm...MS has nothing to do with Epson drivers. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
WIN 7 Major USB Hardware Incompatibilities ?
"Al Smith" wrote in message ... mike wrote: It's Microsoft's responsibility to make their new OS compatible with the hardware I already have. I'm sure they have a lot of excuses. I don't want excuses. I want my (*(*& hardware to continue to work!!! It may not support new features, but it should do at least what it used to do. Period!!! Microsoft has let us down in that area. Sorry for any inconvenience, my A$$. Tell me about it. I've got a perfectly good Epson Perfection Photo 1260 flatbed scanner, and it won't run under Windows 7 x64. No driver for it. Epson can't be bothered writing one, and Microsoft just doesn't care. -Al- I feel for you and Mike, really I do, but I still don't see where it would be Microsoft's responsibility to insure that every single piece of hardware out there, no matter how old(?), would be compatible with it. If people think it's expensive now, imagine what that would do to the cost! If it was even possible to pull it off. And why should Microsoft care about Epson? Or HP, or Lexmark, or any of them? None of them obviously care for Microsoft, or the end user's problems with their proprietary software. I had an older HP printer that I loved since it would handle letter and ANSI B size drawings, but when I went to XP, HP didn't. I could still print and plot using the XP generic driver for it, but HP never came out with an update, and the printer was only 2, 2-1/2 years old at the time XP came out. I lost a little of the versatility of the printer, but I still don't think that was XP's fault. But, that's just me. . . -- SC Tom |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
WIN 7 Major USB Hardware Incompatibilities ?
In article ,
says... mike wrote: It's Microsoft's responsibility to make their new OS compatible with the hardware I already have. I'm sure they have a lot of excuses. I don't want excuses. I want my (*(*& hardware to continue to work!!! It may not support new features, but it should do at least what it used to do. Period!!! Microsoft has let us down in that area. Sorry for any inconvenience, my A$$. Tell me about it. I've got a perfectly good Epson Perfection Photo 1260 flatbed scanner, and it won't run under Windows 7 x64. No driver for it. Epson can't be bothered writing one, and Microsoft just doesn't care. -Al- I found one for my 1650 Scanner that works great. So look he (this is one very long URL) http://www.kvaz.com/index.php?q=epso...1260+vista+x64 +driver.rar&search2=Search+files!&stype=all&S1=%3C a+target%3D%22_blank% 22+href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kvaz.com%22% 3EThe+best+Rapidshare+Search+Engine+for+epson+perf ection+1650+vista+x64 +driver.rar+-+over+12+488+551+links!%3C%2Fa%3E&forum=[url%3Dhttp%3A%2F% 2Fwww.kvaz.com%2Ffile_epson%2Bperfection%2B1650%2B vista%2Bx64% 2Bdriver.rar.html]epson+perfection+1650+vista+x64+driver.rar[%2Furl] &forum=%3Ca+href%3D%27http%3A%2F%2Fwww.kvaz.com%2F file_epson% 2Bperfection%2B1650%2Bvista%2Bx64%2Bdriver.rar.htm l%27+title%3D% 27epson+perfection+1650+vista+x64+driver.rar%27%3E epson+perfection+1650 +vista+x64+driver.rar%3C%2Fa%3E&forum=http%3A%2F%2 Fwww.kvaz.com% 2Ffile_epson%2Bperfection%2B1650%2Bvista%2Bx64%2Bd river.rar.html |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
WIN 7 Major USB Hardware Incompatibilities ?
On 22 Feb 2010, mike wrote in alt.windows7.general:
It's Microsoft's responsibility to make their new OS compatible with the hardware I already have. I'm sure they have a lot of excuses. I don't want excuses. I want my (*(*& hardware to continue to work!!! It may not support new features, but it should do at least what it used to do. Period!!! Sorry, but you're living in a fantasy world - that's not the way it goes. Unless Microsoft makes an explicit claim that a certain piece of hardware will work, out-of-the-box with Windows, then it's up to the manufacturer to supply the device driver. That's the way it has ALWAYS worked with EVERY version of Windows. That's probably the way it will always work. Get used to it... and urge the hardware vendor to release updated drivers. You're more liable to get results doing that than complaining here or to Microsoft. I just built myself this handy dandy digital butt-scratcher with a USB interface. Do you suppose Windows 7 supports it? |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
WIN 7 Major USB Hardware Incompatibilities ?
"Nil" wrote in message ... On 22 Feb 2010, mike wrote in alt.windows7.general: snip I just built myself this handy dandy digital butt-scratcher with a USB interface. Do you suppose Windows 7 supports it? I hope so and I want one. :-D |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is better Athlon XP or Athlon 64 ? Binary incompatibilities ? | Jason Stacy | Asus Motherboards | 0 | January 6th 07 06:39 PM |
Major hardware problems - fans shutting down - overheating | loreleibansidhe | Homebuilt PC's | 4 | September 22nd 06 05:58 PM |
major problem | code_wrong | General | 0 | November 12th 05 02:17 PM |
Adding Memory Incompatibilities. Reality or nightmare? | Tomás Ortí Martín | Dell Computers | 30 | June 6th 04 04:55 AM |
EBUYER: Site incompatibilities | M@ | UK Computer Vendors | 1 | January 21st 04 08:50 AM |