If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
High density (128x4) PC3200 RAM compatibility
Hello all.
I am confused as to if high density (128x4) PC3200/DDR400 DIMMs will work with my new Athlon64 3500+ 90nm socket 939 processor and Gigabyte K8NS Ultra-939 motherboard? I've tried to research this but it is very hard to find any definitive information about it on the web. I know that the memory controller is built into the Athlon64 chip and it is 128-bits wide. The Gigabyte documentation only says to refer to AMD specs for memory compatibility. Looking at AMD's site hasn't given me any answers either but I could be missing something. I'm sure many of you know why I'm asking - 128x4 DIMMs are much less expensive than other DIMMs so you can get more "bang for your buck" using them. Additionally, does anybody know if these are quality components? I assume the lower price is because there is less of a market/demand for them. aTdHvAaNnKcSe for any information the collective can provide. - Marc - |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Marc Montemorra wrote:
Hello all. Hi, I am confused as to if high density (128x4) PC3200/DDR400 DIMMs will work with my new Athlon64 3500+ 90nm socket 939 processor and Gigabyte K8NS Ultra-939 motherboard? Check AMD website. You will find a PDF file listing compatible memory modules. Although I admit that that list doesn't seem to be complete, I don't find any 128x4 modules in that list. So I think, it's quite risky to buy such modules. Does Gigabyte provide a list of memory modules known as working? Michael |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the response.
No, Gigabyte docs I've read for the nVidia nForce3 Ultra chipset only say to refer to AMD docs since the memory controller is onboard the CPU. In looking at the AMD docs I'm sure you are referring to (http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/TechnicalResources/0,,30_182_869_893^10125,00.html) no 128x4 modules are listed under the Athlon 64 doc but they are listed for the Athlon 64FX. But is the Athlon 64 doc only for the 754-pin packaging? I ask this because in the 754-pin models the CPU only has a 64-bit wide memory controller while the 939-pin processors have a 128-bit wide controller like the FX has had all the time. Do you see my confusion? I've also found another thing I don't understand. On the Kingston site ( http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/conf...submit1=Search ) it says "This system only supports 4 banks of DDR400 memory. If two double-sided DIMMs are used, the 3rd and 4th sockets are disabled." Why would this be? Is this a limitation of the AMD onboard memory controller? It also states, that you can only go up to 2GB RAM at DDR400 speeds while you can go up to 4GB is you use DDR333. Again, is this a limitation of AMD's onboard memory controller? As always, aTdHvAaNnKcSe for any responses. Michael Paul wrote: I am confused as to if high density (128x4) PC3200/DDR400 DIMMs will work with my new Athlon64 3500+ 90nm socket 939 processor and Gigabyte K8NS Ultra-939 motherboard? Check AMD website. You will find a PDF file listing compatible memory modules. Although I admit that that list doesn't seem to be complete, I don't find any 128x4 modules in that list. So I think, it's quite risky to buy such modules. Does Gigabyte provide a list of memory modules known as working? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the response.
No, Gigabyte docs I've read for the nVidia nForce3 Ultra chipset only say to refer to AMD docs since the memory controller is onboard the CPU. In looking at the AMD docs I'm sure you are referring to (http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/TechnicalResources/0,,30_182_869_893^10125,00.html) no 128x4 modules are listed under the Athlon 64 doc but they are listed for the Athlon 64FX. But is the Athlon 64 doc only for the 754-pin packaging? I ask this because in the 754-pin models the CPU only has a 64-bit wide memory controller while the 939-pin processors have a 128-bit wide controller like the FX has had all the time. Do you see my confusion? I've also found another thing I don't understand. On the Kingston site ( http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/conf...submit1=Search ) it says "This system only supports 4 banks of DDR400 memory. If two double-sided DIMMs are used, the 3rd and 4th sockets are disabled." Why would this be? Is this a limitation of the AMD onboard memory controller? It also states, that you can only go up to 2GB RAM at DDR400 speeds while you can go up to 4GB is you use DDR333. Again, is this a limitation of AMD's onboard memory controller? As always, aTdHvAaNnKcSe for any responses. Michael Paul wrote: I am confused as to if high density (128x4) PC3200/DDR400 DIMMs will work with my new Athlon64 3500+ 90nm socket 939 processor and Gigabyte K8NS Ultra-939 motherboard? Check AMD website. You will find a PDF file listing compatible memory modules. Although I admit that that list doesn't seem to be complete, I don't find any 128x4 modules in that list. So I think, it's quite risky to buy such modules. Does Gigabyte provide a list of memory modules known as working? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for the response.
No, Gigabyte docs I've read for the nVidia nForce3 Ultra chipset only say to refer to AMD docs since the memory controller is onboard the CPU. In looking at the AMD docs I'm sure you are referring to (http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/TechnicalResources/0,,30_182_869_893^10125,00.html) no 128x4 modules are listed under the Athlon 64 doc but they are listed for the Athlon 64FX. But is the Athlon 64 doc only for the 754-pin packaging? I ask this because in the 754-pin models the CPU only has a 64-bit wide memory controller while the 939-pin processors have a 128-bit wide controller like the FX has had all the time. Do you see my confusion? I've also found another thing I don't understand. On the Kingston site ( http://www.ec.kingston.com/ecom/conf...submit1=Search ) it says "This system only supports 4 banks of DDR400 memory. If two double-sided DIMMs are used, the 3rd and 4th sockets are disabled." Why would this be? Is this a limitation of the AMD onboard memory controller? It also states, that you can only go up to 2GB RAM at DDR400 speeds while you can go up to 4GB is you use DDR333. Again, is this a limitation of AMD's onboard memory controller? As always, aTdHvAaNnKcSe for any responses. Michael Paul wrote: I am confused as to if high density (128x4) PC3200/DDR400 DIMMs will work with my new Athlon64 3500+ 90nm socket 939 processor and Gigabyte K8NS Ultra-939 motherboard? Check AMD website. You will find a PDF file listing compatible memory modules. Although I admit that that list doesn't seem to be complete, I don't find any 128x4 modules in that list. So I think, it's quite risky to buy such modules. Does Gigabyte provide a list of memory modules known as working? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Am Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:49:44 GMT schrieb Marc Montemorra:
Thanks for the response. No, Gigabyte docs I've read for the nVidia nForce3 Ultra chipset only say to refer to AMD docs since the memory controller is onboard the CPU. Okay. Some mobo manufacturers did perform own tests (or the users did and posted that in the forums). In looking at the AMD docs I'm sure you are referring to (http://www.amd.com/ (snipped) ) Yes, that's the doc I meant. ... but they are listed for the Athlon 64FX. But is the Athlon 64 doc only for the 754-pin packaging? No, I think, it fits socket 939, too. That doc refers unbuffered memory, and that's what both Athlon64-CPU will support. I ask this because in the 754-pin models the CPU only has a 64-bit wide memory controller while the 939-pin processors have a 128-bit wide controller like the FX has had all the time. Do you see my confusion? Yes, I see. The bandwith of the memory controller has nothing to to with the construction of the memory modules. I think, that the FX models have slightly different memory controllers, but I must admit, that I haven't read all the docs about AMD CPUs. I've also found another thing I don't understand. On the Kingston site it says "This system only supports 4 banks of DDR400 memory. If two double-sided DIMMs are used, the 3rd and 4th sockets are disabled." Why would this be? Is this a limitation of the AMD onboard memory controller? Yes. It also states, that you can only go up to 2GB RAM at DDR400 speeds while you can go up to 4GB is you use DDR333. Again, is this a limitation of AMD's onboard memory controller? I think so, the manual of my MSI Board (VIA chipset) states the same. There you can use 4 single sided DIMMs in order to get 400MHz DDR and DualChannel mode. If double sided modules are used, then you have DC, but only at 333MHz DDR. If there would exist 1GB single sided modules, then 4GB @400MHz DDR would be feasible. Michael [TOFU recycled] |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High Density RAM | Owen Guppy | General | 2 | October 17th 06 12:41 AM |
Soltek SL75-DRV5 + high density DDR module | Gareth Tuckwell | General | 0 | September 7th 04 09:57 PM |