A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Homebuilt PC's
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Understanding memory w.r.t. Intel G965 / P965 / Q965



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 21st 07, 07:38 PM posted to alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Gerald Dalley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1
Default Understanding memory w.r.t. Intel G965 / P965 / Q965

I have a few questions relating to memory and the Intel 965 series
chipsets...

From what I read, the chipsets require 1.8v memory, but most memory I

see being sold has either a range of voltages (e.g. 1.8-2.1v) or has a
higher voltage listed (e.g. 2.2v). If the memory is listed at a
higher voltage than 1.8v, is there a risk that it won't work on an
Intel mobo?

I'm assuming that tighter timings are just a bonus, so if memory is
listed as 4-4-4-12, then at worst the mobo will just loosen timings to
5-5-5-15 or whatever.

The 965 chipset supports a FSB at 1066 MHz, but dual-channel memory at
800 MHz. Does it do any good to use anything faster than dual-channel
533 MHz (since 533*2=1066)?

  #2  
Old April 21st 07, 07:51 PM posted to alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Dave
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 550
Default Understanding memory w.r.t. Intel G965 / P965 / Q965


"Gerald Dalley" wrote in message
ups.com...
I have a few questions relating to memory and the Intel 965 series
chipsets...

From what I read, the chipsets require 1.8v memory, but most memory I

see being sold has either a range of voltages (e.g. 1.8-2.1v) or has a
higher voltage listed (e.g. 2.2v). If the memory is listed at a
higher voltage than 1.8v, is there a risk that it won't work on an
Intel mobo?


Definitely

I'm assuming that tighter timings are just a bonus, so if memory is
listed as 4-4-4-12, then at worst the mobo will just loosen timings to
5-5-5-15 or whatever.


Wrong assumption. The motherboard should attempt to run RAM at default
timings, ACCORDING TO THE RAM. This could have unpredictable results if the
RAM timings are more aggressive than the motherboard chipset can fully
support. Now it's POSSIBLE that you could buy higher quality RAM and set
the timings MANUALLY to match what the mainboard chipset is happy with. But
unless you know someone who has used the same mainboard/RAM combination,
that's a heckuva risk to take. Better to buy RAM that perfectly matches the
mainboard.


The 965 chipset supports a FSB at 1066 MHz, but dual-channel memory at
800 MHz. Does it do any good to use anything faster than dual-channel
533 MHz (since 533*2=1066)?


Yes, it is a good idea to buy the fastest RAM that your motherboard
supports. RAM has been running asynchronously with other system timings for
many years now. Trying to match other system timings by buying slower RAM
is shooting yourself in the foot, performance wise. Not that you'll notice
much difference anyway, but 800 RAM will be faster. -Dave

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
45nm CPU on P965? Roman Asus Motherboards 0 March 18th 07 05:03 PM
Intel 82801 HR/HH/HO Sata Raid Controller and Intel P965 Chipset Dim Intel 6 January 13th 07 05:18 PM
P5B-VM G965 mobos overheating RichH Asus Motherboards 2 November 16th 06 03:18 PM
understanding memory specs help nospam Homebuilt PC's 2 September 30th 06 12:16 PM
DDR Memory - New Understanding Russ Asus Motherboards 4 August 6th 03 12:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.