If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Motherboard design
I have a Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 mobo and i wonder why motherboard
manufacturers of a lot of brands have the slots for the memory modules close together where slots 1&2 and 3&4 are concerned. I have memory modules which have heat sinks mounted and it is impossible to get 2 modules fitted side by side, eg slots 1&2 as the width of the heatsinks won't allow. Have any other system builders out there come across this too?? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Motherboard design
That's because for Dual Channel operation you are supposed to use the same
color slots...which are not close together... pk "timelord" wrote in message ... I have a Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 mobo and i wonder why motherboard manufacturers of a lot of brands have the slots for the memory modules close together where slots 1&2 and 3&4 are concerned. I have memory modules which have heat sinks mounted and it is impossible to get 2 modules fitted side by side, eg slots 1&2 as the width of the heatsinks won't allow. Have any other system builders out there come across this too?? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Motherboard design
"timelord" wrote in message ... I have a Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 mobo and i wonder why motherboard manufacturers of a lot of brands have the slots for the memory modules close together where slots 1&2 and 3&4 are concerned. I have memory modules which have heat sinks mounted and it is impossible to get 2 modules fitted side by side, eg slots 1&2 as the width of the heatsinks won't allow. Have any other system builders out there come across this too?? timelord, don't mean to be critical but did you select suitable memory? My Crucial memory with heat sinks on both sides fits just fine on my GA EP-DS3P motherboard even in adjacent slots. Of course if running in dual channel you should not be fitting memory in adjacent slots. regards, Beemer |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Motherboard design
OK, i understand what you mean about Dual Channel slots but what if you want
to add more memory to the additional slots remaining as in my case. On my mobo as i suppose many others too, slots 1&3 or 2&4 are used in order to get Dual Channel. I have filled the other 2 slots with identical memory and now have 8gig in total, 4 x 2gig modules and it still works as Dual Channel. "peter" wrote in message ... That's because for Dual Channel operation you are supposed to use the same color slots...which are not close together... pk "timelord" wrote in message ... I have a Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 mobo and i wonder why motherboard manufacturers of a lot of brands have the slots for the memory modules close together where slots 1&2 and 3&4 are concerned. I have memory modules which have heat sinks mounted and it is impossible to get 2 modules fitted side by side, eg slots 1&2 as the width of the heatsinks won't allow. Have any other system builders out there come across this too?? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Motherboard design
timelord wrote:
I have a Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 mobo and i wonder why motherboard manufacturers of a lot of brands have the slots for the memory modules close together where slots 1&2 and 3&4 are concerned. I have memory modules which have heat sinks mounted and it is impossible to get 2 modules fitted side by side, eg slots 1&2 as the width of the heatsinks won't allow. Have any other system builders out there come across this too?? You're blaming the wrong party here. All motherboards I've seen have always had the memory sockets very close together. For two reasons: first, there's limited room on a motherboard and second and most important, the signal path between the memory modules and the memory controller (usually the North Bridge chip) must be as short as possible for good signal integrity. A memory module manufacturer knows full well what the size requirements are for the motherboard, so they shouldn't have put such large, or thick heatsinks on the modules you have. I've used many memory modules with heatsinks on them with different MBs and never had a problem, so your beef is with the memory manufacturer, not the MB manufacturer. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Motherboard design
I have memory modules which have heat sinks mounted and it is impossible
to get 2 modules fitted side by side That is because you are not using the memory that is designed for the board. That would be a tad ridiculous if a MB manufacture built a MB with four slots but only two could be used. I could ask the same question about the CPU fan, I want to put this big whopping fan on my CPU but the mounting is not correct and the fan would stick out of the case, and I would not be able to use any PCI slots. So, did the case, and the motherboard manufacturers mess up? --g |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Motherboard design
I have a system with all 4 slots filled with Patriot memory which have heat
spreader on them and they fit ..tight but fit. fine on my older Gigabyte board... What memory are you using that the spreaders are so large??? peter "timelord" wrote in message ... OK, i understand what you mean about Dual Channel slots but what if you want to add more memory to the additional slots remaining as in my case. On my mobo as i suppose many others too, slots 1&3 or 2&4 are used in order to get Dual Channel. I have filled the other 2 slots with identical memory and now have 8gig in total, 4 x 2gig modules and it still works as Dual Channel. "peter" wrote in message ... That's because for Dual Channel operation you are supposed to use the same color slots...which are not close together... pk "timelord" wrote in message ... I have a Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 mobo and i wonder why motherboard manufacturers of a lot of brands have the slots for the memory modules close together where slots 1&2 and 3&4 are concerned. I have memory modules which have heat sinks mounted and it is impossible to get 2 modules fitted side by side, eg slots 1&2 as the width of the heatsinks won't allow. Have any other system builders out there come across this too?? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Motherboard design
Peter, i am using OCZ Reaper X PC3 10666 DDR3 1333mhz.
Here is a link to the place i bought it and it's the one at the bottom of the list shown. http://www.ebuyer.com/search?store=2&cat=3&subcat=2207 BTW, it is not the heat pipes that prevent them from fitting. "peter" wrote in message ... I have a system with all 4 slots filled with Patriot memory which have heat spreader on them and they fit ..tight but fit. fine on my older Gigabyte board... What memory are you using that the spreaders are so large??? peter "timelord" wrote in message ... OK, i understand what you mean about Dual Channel slots but what if you want to add more memory to the additional slots remaining as in my case. On my mobo as i suppose many others too, slots 1&3 or 2&4 are used in order to get Dual Channel. I have filled the other 2 slots with identical memory and now have 8gig in total, 4 x 2gig modules and it still works as Dual Channel. "peter" wrote in message ... That's because for Dual Channel operation you are supposed to use the same color slots...which are not close together... pk "timelord" wrote in message ... I have a Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6 mobo and i wonder why motherboard manufacturers of a lot of brands have the slots for the memory modules close together where slots 1&2 and 3&4 are concerned. I have memory modules which have heat sinks mounted and it is impossible to get 2 modules fitted side by side, eg slots 1&2 as the width of the heatsinks won't allow. Have any other system builders out there come across this too?? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Motherboard design
timelord wrote:
Peter, i am using OCZ Reaper X PC3 10666 DDR3 1333mhz. Here is a link to the place i bought it and it's the one at the bottom of the list shown. http://www.ebuyer.com/search?store=2&cat=3&subcat=2207 BTW, it is not the heat pipes that prevent them from fitting. http://www.ocztechnology.com/product...nced_bandwidth "Important Note: Due to the size and orientation of the heatsink, Reaper X memory cannot be installed on motherboards that require the modules to be inserted in sockets side by side." But that note is not saying whether the flat area of the module is too fat, or whether they're referring to the fin array at the top. Some of their other modules, which have only a single fin array, don't have that warning on the OCZ site. Paul |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Motherboard design
Hi Paul, well i guess that clears that up then. I never thought about
looking on the manufacturers website. I have taken a risk in fitting the modules side by side by removing half a heatsink from 2 modules so i can get them to fit. As the heatsink pipes from adjacent modules make contact with each other i will see how things go. I have a good case with plenty of cooling and circulation and have had not had any problems even under hard gaming. Thanks for the link Paul. "Paul" wrote in message ... timelord wrote: Peter, i am using OCZ Reaper X PC3 10666 DDR3 1333mhz. Here is a link to the place i bought it and it's the one at the bottom of the list shown. http://www.ebuyer.com/search?store=2&cat=3&subcat=2207 BTW, it is not the heat pipes that prevent them from fitting. http://www.ocztechnology.com/product...nced_bandwidth "Important Note: Due to the size and orientation of the heatsink, Reaper X memory cannot be installed on motherboards that require the modules to be inserted in sockets side by side." But that note is not saying whether the flat area of the module is too fat, or whether they're referring to the fin array at the top. Some of their other modules, which have only a single fin array, don't have that warning on the OCZ site. Paul |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Product design | [email protected] | Homebuilt PC's | 0 | February 20th 08 08:07 AM |
NetApp Design | Ryan | Storage & Hardrives | 0 | October 27th 06 02:57 PM |
hardware design | [email protected] | General | 2 | January 2nd 06 06:05 AM |
Motherboard+CPU for CAD-Design/Catia v5 | Jacek Spychala | Homebuilt PC's | 2 | April 18th 05 06:56 PM |
Looking for schematics of Byteswap logic on AT motherboard design | smulders | General | 1 | October 14th 04 11:41 PM |