A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » Overclocking AMD Processors
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

HELP: Athlon Thunderbird 1400+ settings....(?????)



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 2nd 05, 06:35 PM
Ippus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default HELP: Athlon Thunderbird 1400+ settings....(?????)

Hi,
I've got an Athlon Thunderbird 1400+ CPU (the last Athlon before Athlon XP)
on a ABIT KG7, chipset AMD 761....
I would like to know which is the properly speed that I must set it on....

I mean, if it's a 1400+ it means that it works just like a 1400 but it isn't
effectively a CPU working at 1400 MHz...right?

My actual setting is:
-FSB: 133 MHz
-Multiplyer: 10x
== it works at 1333 Mhz....at 52 °C....is it ok or is it too hot?

In your opinion, is it the proper setting? And which is the base setting?

Any suggestion?

Thanks for reading....

Bye


  #2  
Old March 2nd 05, 08:43 PM
dawg
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

1400's actualy ran at 1.4ghz. 133 x 10.5
"Ippus" wrote in message
...
Hi,
I've got an Athlon Thunderbird 1400+ CPU (the last Athlon before Athlon

XP)
on a ABIT KG7, chipset AMD 761....
I would like to know which is the properly speed that I must set it on....

I mean, if it's a 1400+ it means that it works just like a 1400 but it

isn't
effectively a CPU working at 1400 MHz...right?

My actual setting is:
-FSB: 133 MHz
-Multiplyer: 10x
== it works at 1333 Mhz....at 52 °C....is it ok or is it too hot?

In your opinion, is it the proper setting? And which is the base setting?

Any suggestion?

Thanks for reading....

Bye




  #3  
Old March 2nd 05, 09:44 PM
Rubbie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ippus" wrote in message
...
My actual setting is:
-FSB: 133 MHz
-Multiplyer: 10x
== it works at 1333 Mhz....at 52 °C....is it ok or is it too hot?


Temperature is OK for an Thunderbird.... they were well known for their
temperatures, so to say

And as Dawg already said, a 1400 Mhz Athlon TB runs at 1,4 Ghz

Greetings Rubbie


  #4  
Old March 2nd 05, 10:23 PM
Bill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"dawg" don't says...
1400's actualy ran at 1.4ghz. 133 x 10.5

snip

I seem to remember the "B" model ran at 14x100. The "C" ran at 10.5
x133.

Bill
  #5  
Old March 2nd 05, 11:02 PM
Ippus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And how can I discover it? I mean, how I could understand if I've got the B
or the C one?

....Now I just see that if I set it at 1200*133 it is unstable....at 1333*10
it is ok....but....If I do a simple application, temp increase up to 60°C
......is it "bad"?
Which is the Critical Temperature that it could support?

"Bill" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
In article ,
"dawg" don't says...
1400's actualy ran at 1.4ghz. 133 x 10.5

snip

I seem to remember the "B" model ran at 14x100. The "C" ran at 10.5
x133.

Bill



  #8  
Old March 4th 05, 07:36 AM
Bill
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
says...

"Bill" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
And how can I discover it? I mean, how I could understand if I've got

the B
or the C one?

...Now I just see that if I set it at 1200*133 it is unstable....at

1333*10
it is ok....but....If I do a simple application, temp increase up to

60°C
.....is it "bad"?
Which is the Critical Temperature that it could support?

"Bill" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
In article ,
"dawg" don't
says...
1400's actualy ran at 1.4ghz. 133 x 10.5

snip

I seem to remember the "B" model ran at 14x100. The "C" ran at 10.5
x133.

Bill




On the top of the processor, wipe off the heat paste and get your
magnifying glass out there is a line of numbers that goes like:

A1400XXXXB or A1400XXXXC B for the 100FSB and C for the 133 FSB.

This was nice enough to bookmark:

http://www.thedigerati.us/info/amdcpuchart.html

Scroll down to AMD Thunderbirds/ Model 4. Max Temp on die is 95C, but
since you're not measuring the die temp I wouldn't let it get past 65C
indicated. I seem to remember mine got flaky above that temp.

Bill


Hmm my ADM TB is getting up to 72c in the summerdays... runs smooth though,
I'm using a C version btw .



Ya, but how accurate is your measuring device for temp. If it's the
motherboard, who knows what the temp really is. As an old tech/QA guy,
if it wasn't measured with a calibrated meter with recent calibration
sticker on it then I don't trust it. 72C on your board might be the
same as 63C on mine and might really be 71C when measured with the
meter. That'd make you only one degree high, which is erring on the
good side, and mine eight degrees low erring on the bad side.

I use the bios temp as a ball park, crank it up 'till I get errors,
then back off a bit 'till it's stable again. YMMV.

Bill
  #9  
Old March 4th 05, 11:50 AM
Rubbie
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bill" wrote in message
cut


Ya, but how accurate is your measuring device for temp. If it's the
motherboard, who knows what the temp really is. As an old tech/QA guy,
if it wasn't measured with a calibrated meter with recent calibration
sticker on it then I don't trust it. 72C on your board might be the
same as 63C on mine and might really be 71C when measured with the
meter. That'd make you only one degree high, which is erring on the
good side, and mine eight degrees low erring on the bad side.

I use the bios temp as a ball park, crank it up 'till I get errors,
then back off a bit 'till it's stable again. YMMV.

Bill


Bios is showing that to me ... and my pc automatically turns off if it
reaches 75c... anyway, I don't have problems with instability and also
never OC'd it yet... and not planning too either .

Rubbie


  #10  
Old March 6th 05, 09:55 PM
Ippus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How Could I discover which model I'm using?
Is it strictly necessary to remove the fan?
......
Bye


"Bill" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
In article ,
"dawg" don't says...
1400's actualy ran at 1.4ghz. 133 x 10.5

snip

I seem to remember the "B" model ran at 14x100. The "C" ran at 10.5
x133.

Bill



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pentium 4 vs. Athlon XP vs. Athlon 64's MarkW General 2 October 10th 06 12:11 PM
Advice on an AMD Athlon 64 3000+ 939 System Chris Hafner Homebuilt PC's 11 February 8th 05 03:22 AM
Proposed Build - Help! Colin Phillips Homebuilt PC's 19 August 11th 04 11:12 AM
A7V333 with Athlon 3000 XP MarkW General 8 January 3rd 04 09:32 PM
AMD Athlon 64FX first impressions Chris General 14 September 29th 03 02:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.