Aquamark 03

i dunno but i get 43,xxx with the same setup as you (except A7n8x MOBO)


"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...

"MikeE" wrote in message
...

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
news
Bull****
No way did you get that score......


Grow up, I ran Aquamark again and here you go:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=467166024

MikeE

So how do you explain that one then?
I am running the same driver set, an XP2600 overclocked to 400fsb and
400fsb
memory and 2.2ghz and with a radeon 9700 pro overclocked to 9800 pro
speeds
on an abit nf7s and I still dont get near yours. Hows that then?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=118717048

Your system seems slow as i get fully 2,000 more points than you.
A7n8X deluxe , 512 Mb Kingston HyperX 9700 AIW XP2500 @11x200

I get around 39,000 with no overclocking on the vid card.

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...

"MikeE" wrote in message
.. .

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...

Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those results,
something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max
running
at
333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt
running
at
266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this bloody
scoring mechanism is all wrong....


I'm running the memory 200fsb (2 sticks in slots 2&3) and cpu 10.5x200
I only downloaded aquamark this evening, I didn't know that you can
cheat
it.

MikeE



Okay at an oc of 200fsb and 200 memory and running at 2.2ghz with 3.7 cats
and running gfx card at 385mhz core and 338 mem I still only get 41212
So I think somethign isn't quite right, this cannot possibly be....Anyone
else noticed such discrepancies? Is this yet another benchmark we can't
trust?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=481520328

28,XXX with an Asus A7n8x (non deluxe) , 512 of Corsair PC3200C2, Athlon xp
1700+ @ 8x200 and a RAdeon 9600PRO @ 492/341 Core/MEM


"Shawk" wrote in message
...
Hiya,

Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online but
Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for
access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they
fared?

GFX - 3420
CPU - 4165
Score - 24,243

Asus A7V8X
XP2100+ (palomino)
Sapphire 9600 pro
512meg PC2700

Cheers, Shawk.

AquaMark Sco 44064

CPU Sco 10331 (P4c at 3.3Ghz)
GFX Sco 5598

RADEON 9700 PRO
Graphics Card Core Clockrate: 371 MHz (MegaHertz)
Graphics Card Memory Clockrate: 344 MHz (MegaHertz)
Graphics Card Driver Version: 6.14.10.6378 (cat 3.7)
Graphics Card Video Memory: 134217728 Byte ( ~128 MegaByte)
Graphics Texture Memory: Byte ( ~239 MegaByte)


"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...

"MikeE" wrote in message
.. .

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...

Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those results,
something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max
running
at
333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt
running
at
266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this bloody
scoring mechanism is all wrong....


I'm running the memory 200fsb (2 sticks in slots 2&3) and cpu 10.5x200
I only downloaded aquamark this evening, I didn't know that you can
cheat
it.

MikeE



Okay at an oc of 200fsb and 200 memory and running at 2.2ghz with 3.7 cats
and running gfx card at 385mhz core and 338 mem I still only get 41212
So I think somethign isn't quite right, this cannot possibly be....Anyone
else noticed such discrepancies? Is this yet another benchmark we can't
trust?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=481520328

NICE!

Your about 1500 points higher then my overclocked 9700 Pro but my CPU makes
up for allot!
Your overclocked 9800 Pro on a P4c would be amazing!!

Great Score. Now go play some games



"John David Carter" wrote in message
...
"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...

"MikeE" wrote in message
...

"methylenedioxy" wrote in
message
news Bull****
No way did you get that score......


Grow up, I ran Aquamark again and here you go:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=467166024

MikeE

So how do you explain that one then?
I am running the same driver set, an XP2600 overclocked to 400fsb and
400fsb
memory and 2.2ghz and with a radeon 9700 pro overclocked to 9800 pro
speeds
on an abit nf7s and I still dont get near yours. Hows that then?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=118717048

Hmmm...

Can't figure it, but my sco 45525

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=138422817

GFX: 6312
CPU: 8158
FPS: 45.53

XP2500+ ( Barton ) @ 2405mhz on Abit NF7-S 2.0
9800pro @ 410/360 dx9b - cat. 3.7 ( Omegas 2.4.78 )
1Gb Corsair XMS3200

How about this with FSAA-2X and AF-4X
AquaMark Sco 37686
CPU Sco 10397
GFX Sco 4602
Average Frame Rate: 37.6

And this with FSAA-4Xand AF-4X
AquaMark Sco 35617
CPU Sco 10409
GFX Sco 4296
Average Frame Rate: 35.6

At FSAA-2X and AF-4X I was getting lots of display corruption with the new
Cat. 3.7 drivers but with FSAA-4X and AF-4X all display corruption went
away! Weird.

This 9700 Pro is very powerfull at FSAA and AF, I'm very happy with it.



"fish" wrote in message
et...
AquaMark Sco 44064

CPU Sco 10331 (P4c at 3.3Ghz)
GFX Sco 5598

RADEON 9700 PRO
Graphics Card Core Clockrate: 371 MHz (MegaHertz)
Graphics Card Memory Clockrate: 344 MHz (MegaHertz)
Graphics Card Driver Version: 6.14.10.6378 (cat 3.7)
Graphics Card Video Memory: 134217728 Byte ( ~128 MegaByte)
Graphics Texture Memory: Byte ( ~239 MegaByte)


"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...

"MikeE" wrote in message
.. .

"methylenedioxy" wrote in
message
...

Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those
results,
something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max
running
at
333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt
running
at
266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this
bloody
scoring mechanism is all wrong....


I'm running the memory 200fsb (2 sticks in slots 2&3) and cpu 10.5x200
I only downloaded aquamark this evening, I didn't know that you can
cheat
it.

MikeE



Okay at an oc of 200fsb and 200 memory and running at 2.2ghz with 3.7
cats
and running gfx card at 385mhz core and 338 mem I still only get 41212
So I think somethign isn't quite right, this cannot possibly
be....Anyone
else noticed such discrepancies? Is this yet another benchmark we can't
trust?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=481520328

hehehe woo hoo just for kicks i ran the damn thing on my 7500aiw 6500+/-....GFX was something like 629 i think...CPU was 5XXX

"Shawk" wrote in message ...
Hiya,

Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online but
Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for
access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they
fared?

GFX - 3420
CPU - 4165
Score - 24,243

Asus A7V8X
XP2100+ (palomino)
Sapphire 9600 pro
512meg PC2700

Cheers, Shawk.

"Kirby Crosby" wrote in message
.rogers.com...
Your system seems slow as i get fully 2,000 more points than you.
A7n8X deluxe , 512 Mb Kingston HyperX 9700 AIW XP2500 @11x200

I get around 39,000 with no overclocking on the vid card.

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
Okay at an oc of 200fsb and 200 memory and running at 2.2ghz with 3.7
cats
and running gfx card at 385mhz core and 338 mem I still only get 41212
So I think somethign isn't quite right, this cannot possibly
be....Anyone
else noticed such discrepancies? Is this yet another benchmark we can't
trust?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=481520328

Know what? Me and Kirby have Bartons, while methylenedioxy has a Tbird...

Also, I would wonder what what type of ram methylenedioxy has...

Maybe the extra L2 cache and tighter ram timings make the difference...

I got C:7560, G:6030, and S:43127.

I gained 1200 in score just from changing from Omega drivers to
Cat3.7s
I'm going to try shutting off some services, which brought me up 700
in score with the Omegas.

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_use...tMeasurement=0

I'll try it on my kid's machine tomorrow, it has a 9600pro


On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:10:01 +0000 (UTC), "Shawk"
wrote:

Hiya,

Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online but
Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for
access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they
fared?

GFX - 3420
CPU - 4165
Score - 24,243

Asus A7V8X
XP2100+ (palomino)
Sapphire 9600 pro
512meg PC2700

Cheers, Shawk.

"Roger Squires" wrote in message
m...
Looks like I'm the high man here so far: 46300.
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=234036815

Seems as though FSB speed counts for alot...

231! What mobo? ram? Any special cooling?