Aquamark 03

"Shawk" wrote in message
...
Hiya,

Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online but
Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for
access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they
fared?

GFX - 3420
CPU - 4165
Score - 24,243

Asus A7V8X
XP2100+ (palomino)
Sapphire 9600 pro
512meg PC2700

Cheers, Shawk.

For comparison - overclocked but not softmodded 9500 non-pro

AquaMark Sco 25089

CPU: 5151,
GFX: 3315
FPS: 25.09
TPS: 7552 K
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ CR: 2152 MHz (overclocked Barton 2500+)
SRAM: 1024 MB
OS: Microsoft Windows 2000
GFX: RADEON 9500 SERIES CM: 371 / 297 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER:
6.14.1.6292

Tony

"TMack" wrote in message
...

"Shawk" wrote in message
...
Hiya,

Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online
but
Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for
access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they
fared?

GFX - 3420
CPU - 4165
Score - 24,243

Asus A7V8X
XP2100+ (palomino)
Sapphire 9600 pro
512meg PC2700

Cheers, Shawk.

For comparison - overclocked but not softmodded 9500 non-pro

AquaMark Sco 25089

CPU: 5151,
GFX: 3315
FPS: 25.09
TPS: 7552 K
CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) XP 2600+ CR: 2152 MHz (overclocked Barton 2500+)
SRAM: 1024 MB
OS: Microsoft Windows 2000
GFX: RADEON 9500 SERIES CM: 371 / 297 MHz VRAM: 128 MB DRIVER:
6.14.1.6292

Tony



Thanks all.

Looking to upgrade to a Barton XP2800 soon with another stick of 512meg
PC2700 memory. Should see an improvement in the real world and, judging by
some of the scores here, in the benchmark world too.

Cheers, Shawk.

(Support at Aquamark didnt get back to me so it looks like I'll have to
re-register to do any more comparisons)

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...
So how do you explain that one then?
I am running the same driver set, an XP2600 overclocked to 400fsb and
400fsb
memory and 2.2ghz and with a radeon 9700 pro overclocked to 9800 pro
speeds
on an abit nf7s and I still dont get near yours. Hows that then?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=118717048


I honestly can't explain it, maybe running the 9700pro at 9800pro speeds
isn't enough to give same results?

MikeE

"MikeE" wrote in message
...

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...
So how do you explain that one then?
I am running the same driver set, an XP2600 overclocked to 400fsb and
400fsb
memory and 2.2ghz and with a radeon 9700 pro overclocked to 9800 pro
speeds
on an abit nf7s and I still dont get near yours. Hows that then?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=118717048


I honestly can't explain it, maybe running the 9700pro at 9800pro speeds
isn't enough to give same results?

MikeE


Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those results,
something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max running at
333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt running at
266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this bloody
scoring mechanism is all wrong....

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...

Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those results,
something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max running at
333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt running
at
266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this bloody
scoring mechanism is all wrong....


I'm running the memory 200fsb (2 sticks in slots 2&3) and cpu 10.5x200
I only downloaded aquamark this evening, I didn't know that you can cheat
it.

MikeE

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...

"MikeE" wrote in message
...

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
news
Bull****
No way did you get that score......


Grow up, I ran Aquamark again and here you go:
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=467166024

MikeE

So how do you explain that one then?
I am running the same driver set, an XP2600 overclocked to 400fsb and
400fsb
memory and 2.2ghz and with a radeon 9700 pro overclocked to 9800 pro
speeds
on an abit nf7s and I still dont get near yours. Hows that then?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=118717048

Hmmm...

Can't figure it, but my sco 45525

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=138422817

GFX: 6312
CPU: 8158
FPS: 45.53

XP2500+ ( Barton ) @ 2405mhz on Abit NF7-S 2.0
9800pro @ 410/360 dx9b - cat. 3.7 ( Omegas 2.4.78 )
1Gb Corsair XMS3200

Looks like I'm the high man here so far: 46300.
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=234036815

rms

47410
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=272608248




"Roger Squires" wrote in message
m...
Looks like I'm the high man here so far: 46300.
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=234036815

rms

My system- Gigabyte 7VT600-L, Barton 2500+ (not oc'd), 2x 512 mb Samsung
PC3200 running at 400, Radeon 9600 pro (oc'd core at 450, memory at 330) I
got GFX 3777, CPU 4778, Score 27069.
--
RamFan- 3/10's of 437 MM 3 & 4

"Shawk" wrote in message
...
Hiya,

Anyone run the above on a 9600 Pro? Have registered to compare online but
Mailwasher ate (deleted) my confirmation e-mail!! - whilst waiting for
access to compare I just wondered whether others have tried and how they
fared?

GFX - 3420
CPU - 4165
Score - 24,243

Asus A7V8X
XP2100+ (palomino)
Sapphire 9600 pro
512meg PC2700

Cheers, Shawk.

"MikeE" wrote in message
.. .

"methylenedioxy" wrote in message
...

Even if I pumped up the core even more it wouldn't give those results,
something is amiss here. I am running at 400fsb, you are at max running
at
333 and I doubt that with such a HUGE overclock on cpu (no doubt running
at
266)....So something is amiss, either you are cheating or this bloody
scoring mechanism is all wrong....


I'm running the memory 200fsb (2 sticks in slots 2&3) and cpu 10.5x200
I only downloaded aquamark this evening, I didn't know that you can cheat
it.

MikeE



Okay at an oc of 200fsb and 200 memory and running at 2.2ghz with 3.7 cats
and running gfx card at 385mhz core and 338 mem I still only get 41212
So I think somethign isn't quite right, this cannot possibly be....Anyone
else noticed such discrepancies? Is this yet another benchmark we can't
trust?
http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=481520328