If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Need some advice on an older system
As a spare computer and a secondary computer, we have an eMachines T1090
with a 900MHz Intel (Celeron). Right now, it has the onboard Intel 82810 graphics controller. We can play Quake III Arena with that, (although we do get a message when you open Quake) but the only way to get it run even semi-smoothly is to set the screen resolution to something less than 640x480 and to set all settings at their lowest. The eMachines only has PCI slots - no AGP or PCI-E. First of all, what's more the slow-down - the onboard video, the CPU, or both? The eMachines has 384MB of SDRAM and only a small amount of programs installed. If my goal was to get Quake III to work smoothly at least at a 640x480 screen resolution on medium settings, would it be possible with this system with just an upgraded PCI video card or is it worth the time and effort at all? Secondly, any ideas if the Bestec PSU can handle it? Quake III is the only game I'm concerned about - no plans to run Doom 3, obviously. Thanks Specs (nothing special): 8x4x32 CD-RW drive Floppy drive Windows XP Home 120GB Seagate 8MB cache 7200RPM HD 384MB of SDRAM Intel 82810 onboard graphics |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Need some advice on an older system
"Travis King" wrote in message news:vcmVf.640731$084.285153@attbi_s22...
As a spare computer and a secondary computer, we have an eMachines T1090 with a 900MHz Intel (Celeron). Right now, it has the onboard Intel 82810 graphics controller. We can play Quake III Arena with that, (although we do get a message when you open Quake) but the only way to get it run even semi-smoothly is to set the screen resolution to something less than 640x480 and to set all settings at their lowest. The eMachines only has PCI slots - no AGP or PCI-E. First of all, what's more the slow-down - the onboard video, the CPU, or both? The eMachines has 384MB of SDRAM and only a small amount of programs installed. If my goal was to get Quake III to work smoothly at least at a 640x480 screen resolution on medium settings, would it be possible with this system with just an upgraded PCI video card or is it worth the time and effort at all? It really isn't. Both the cpu and PCI bus are bottlenecks, and if were to upgrade one, the other would become much more of a bottleneck. Bottom line: For certainly the same (and probably less) than the cost to upgrade that system to play Q3A reasonably well, you could get a basic or used P4 or AMD system -- including a new power supply, motherboard, cpu, memory and AGP/PCIe video. Secondly, any ideas if the Bestec PSU can handle it? Quake III is the only game I'm concerned about - no plans to run Doom 3, obviously. Thanks Specs (nothing special): 8x4x32 CD-RW drive Floppy drive Windows XP Home 120GB Seagate 8MB cache 7200RPM HD 384MB of SDRAM Intel 82810 onboard graphics |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Need some advice on an older system
"Bob" wrote in message
ink.net... "Travis King" wrote in message news:vcmVf.640731$084.285153@attbi_s22... As a spare computer and a secondary computer, we have an eMachines T1090 with a 900MHz Intel (Celeron). Right now, it has the onboard Intel 82810 graphics controller. We can play Quake III Arena with that, (although we do get a message when you open Quake) but the only way to get it run even semi-smoothly is to set the screen resolution to something less than 640x480 and to set all settings at their lowest. The eMachines only has PCI slots - no AGP or PCI-E. First of all, what's more the slow-down - the onboard video, the CPU, or both? The eMachines has 384MB of SDRAM and only a small amount of programs installed. If my goal was to get Quake III to work smoothly at least at a 640x480 screen resolution on medium settings, would it be possible with this system with just an upgraded PCI video card or is it worth the time and effort at all? It really isn't. Both the cpu and PCI bus are bottlenecks, and if were to upgrade one, the other would become much more of a bottleneck. Bottom line: For certainly the same (and probably less) than the cost to upgrade that system to play Q3A reasonably well, you could get a basic or used P4 or AMD system -- including a new power supply, motherboard, cpu, memory and AGP/PCIe video. Secondly, any ideas if the Bestec PSU can handle it? Quake III is the only game I'm concerned about - no plans to run Doom 3, obviously. Thanks Specs (nothing special): 8x4x32 CD-RW drive Floppy drive Windows XP Home 120GB Seagate 8MB cache 7200RPM HD 384MB of SDRAM Intel 82810 onboard graphics Then I'll just let it go then. Thanks Bob. P.S. in a month or two anyway, the eMachines will become a third computer and my mother's current computer (With an AMD Athlon XP 1800+ & NVIDIA GeForce4 MX4000) will take its place as the secondary computer. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Need some advice on an older system
On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:34:19 GMT, "Travis King"
wrote: As a spare computer and a secondary computer, we have an eMachines T1090 with a 900MHz Intel (Celeron). Right now, it has the onboard Intel 82810 graphics controller. We can play Quake III Arena with that, (although we do get a message when you open Quake) but the only way to get it run even semi-smoothly is to set the screen resolution to something less than 640x480 and to set all settings at their lowest. The eMachines only has PCI slots - no AGP or PCI-E. First of all, what's more the slow-down - the onboard video, the CPU, or both? The eMachines has 384MB of SDRAM and only a small amount of programs installed. If my goal was to get Quake III to work smoothly at least at a 640x480 screen resolution on medium settings, would it be possible with this system with just an upgraded PCI video card or is it worth the time and effort at all? Secondly, any ideas if the Bestec PSU can handle it? Quake III is the only game I'm concerned about - no plans to run Doom 3, obviously. Thanks Specs (nothing special): 8x4x32 CD-RW drive Floppy drive Windows XP Home 120GB Seagate 8MB cache 7200RPM HD 384MB of SDRAM Intel 82810 onboard graphics Back in the day when Quake III came out, I was running it on a Celeron 366Mhz with 128MB SDRAM, and a 3DFX Voodoo 3 2000. I ran it at 640x480, and from what I remember, it ran in the high 40's FPS. Maybe higher even. I would think that if you got an FX5700 PCI, or maybe the 6200 PCI that it would run Quake III at 800x600 pretty fast on that system. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Need some advice on an older system
"Larry Roberts" wrote in message
... On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:34:19 GMT, "Travis King" wrote: As a spare computer and a secondary computer, we have an eMachines T1090 with a 900MHz Intel (Celeron). Right now, it has the onboard Intel 82810 graphics controller. We can play Quake III Arena with that, (although we do get a message when you open Quake) but the only way to get it run even semi-smoothly is to set the screen resolution to something less than 640x480 and to set all settings at their lowest. The eMachines only has PCI slots - no AGP or PCI-E. First of all, what's more the slow-down - the onboard video, the CPU, or both? The eMachines has 384MB of SDRAM and only a small amount of programs installed. If my goal was to get Quake III to work smoothly at least at a 640x480 screen resolution on medium settings, would it be possible with this system with just an upgraded PCI video card or is it worth the time and effort at all? Secondly, any ideas if the Bestec PSU can handle it? Quake III is the only game I'm concerned about - no plans to run Doom 3, obviously. Thanks Specs (nothing special): 8x4x32 CD-RW drive Floppy drive Windows XP Home 120GB Seagate 8MB cache 7200RPM HD 384MB of SDRAM Intel 82810 onboard graphics Back in the day when Quake III came out, I was running it on a Celeron 366Mhz with 128MB SDRAM, and a 3DFX Voodoo 3 2000. I ran it at 640x480, and from what I remember, it ran in the high 40's FPS. Maybe higher even. I would think that if you got an FX5700 PCI, or maybe the 6200 PCI that it would run Quake III at 800x600 pretty fast on that system. Thanks. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Need some advice on an older system
"Travis King" wrote in message
news:PnGVf.886504$xm3.799169@attbi_s21... "Larry Roberts" wrote in message ... On Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:34:19 GMT, "Travis King" wrote: As a spare computer and a secondary computer, we have an eMachines T1090 with a 900MHz Intel (Celeron). Right now, it has the onboard Intel 82810 graphics controller. We can play Quake III Arena with that, (although we do get a message when you open Quake) but the only way to get it run even semi-smoothly is to set the screen resolution to something less than 640x480 and to set all settings at their lowest. The eMachines only has PCI slots - no AGP or PCI-E. First of all, what's more the slow-down - the onboard video, the CPU, or both? The eMachines has 384MB of SDRAM and only a small amount of programs installed. If my goal was to get Quake III to work smoothly at least at a 640x480 screen resolution on medium settings, would it be possible with this system with just an upgraded PCI video card or is it worth the time and effort at all? Secondly, any ideas if the Bestec PSU can handle it? Quake III is the only game I'm concerned about - no plans to run Doom 3, obviously. Thanks Specs (nothing special): 8x4x32 CD-RW drive Floppy drive Windows XP Home 120GB Seagate 8MB cache 7200RPM HD 384MB of SDRAM Intel 82810 onboard graphics Back in the day when Quake III came out, I was running it on a Celeron 366Mhz with 128MB SDRAM, and a 3DFX Voodoo 3 2000. I ran it at 640x480, and from what I remember, it ran in the high 40's FPS. Maybe higher even. I would think that if you got an FX5700 PCI, or maybe the 6200 PCI that it would run Quake III at 800x600 pretty fast on that system. Thanks. The computer's built and is running well! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need system build advice | A Person | Homebuilt PC's | 6 | September 22nd 05 12:47 PM |
System advice please | Kayf | Overclocking | 4 | February 20th 04 05:58 PM |
FPS Really LOW - Whats Wrong? | John W. | Ati Videocards | 5 | January 20th 04 09:09 AM |
Advice Please: Building A Simple "Back-up" System | Darren Harris | Storage (alternative) | 12 | January 11th 04 03:02 AM |
Cooling Questions | Peter Cavan | Dell Computers | 34 | September 2nd 03 06:42 AM |