If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
win98SE as minimum windows requirement
Hi,
Nowadays, more and more hardware manufacuterers are stating win98SE as the minimum required version of windows to let the hardware run. PQI (manufacturer of my USB memorystick) is an example. But the drivers also work perfectly with my original Win98. I was wondering, is this always the case, or are there actually cases where win98SE works and win98 first edition does not? Halfgaar -- To send me, Halfgaar, email, remove remove from my email address. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:15:23 +0200, Knowing that it was a Hollywood
invention that lemmings jump off cliffs Halfgaar wrote : Hi, Nowadays, more and more hardware manufacuterers are stating win98SE as the minimum required version of windows to let the hardware run. PQI (manufacturer of my USB memorystick) is an example. But the drivers also work perfectly with my original Win98. I was wondering, is this always the case, or are there actually cases where win98SE works and win98 first edition does not? Halfgaar Yes if there's no driver support for the hardware in win98. -- Free Windows/PC help, It's a G not a J in jmx to reply http://www.geocities.com/sheppola/trouble.html Free songs download, http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/nomessiahsmusic.htm |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Shepİ wrote:
Hi, Nowadays, more and more hardware manufacuterers are stating win98SE as the minimum required version of windows to let the hardware run. PQI (manufacturer of my USB memorystick) is an example. But the drivers also work perfectly with my original Win98. I was wondering, is this always the case, or are there actually cases where win98SE works and win98 first edition does not? Halfgaar Yes if there's no driver support for the hardware in win98. Yes what, it is always the case the win98SE driver works in FE, or yes there are cases that FE does not work. As I said, my USB memorystick doesn't support win98FE officially, but it does work perfectly in FE. So, is this SE demand bogus? Halfgaar -- To send me, Halfgaar, email, remove remove from my email address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 23:00:40 +0200, Knowing that it was a Hollywood
invention that lemmings jump off cliffs Halfgaar wrote : Shepİ wrote: Hi, Nowadays, more and more hardware manufacuterers are stating win98SE as the minimum required version of windows to let the hardware run. PQI (manufacturer of my USB memorystick) is an example. But the drivers also work perfectly with my original Win98. I was wondering, is this always the case, or are there actually cases where win98SE works and win98 first edition does not? Halfgaar Yes if there's no driver support for the hardware in win98. Yes what, it is always the case the win98SE driver works in FE, or yes there are cases that FE does not work. As I said, my USB memorystick doesn't support win98FE officially, but it does work perfectly in FE. So, is this SE demand bogus? Halfgaar If the hardware maker's don't design a driver for Win98 gold(1st edition) then it's,"Pot-luck" if the win98SE drivers will work.In many cases they do but the hardware maker's are just covering there A** or they don't support the older O/S.This will occur more and more as time goes by and users move on to newer O/S IMHO. HTH -- Free Windows/PC help, It's a G not a J in jmx to reply http://www.geocities.com/sheppola/trouble.html Free songs download, http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/nomessiahsmusic.htm |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 21:15:23 +0200, Halfgaar
wrote: Hi, Nowadays, more and more hardware manufacuterers are stating win98SE as the minimum required version of windows to let the hardware run. PQI (manufacturer of my USB memorystick) is an example. But the drivers also work perfectly with my original Win98. I was wondering, is this always the case, or are there actually cases where win98SE works and win98 first edition does not? Halfgaar WIn98 had initial WDM support, but it was still a bit buggy in some cases. Win98SE had better WDM support, but there was a Microsoft patch that updated 98SE to the abilities of WinME... I don't think that patch will install on WinFE, but maybe manually? (I have no idea.) So, the same driver installable on FE, might not work right until SE, or SE patched to ME-level. Or, if the installer front-end checks for OS version, the driver might not install at all, even if it "might've" worked if it had installed. Basically, hardware vendors want to cover their asses and minimize customer returns... to that end they only officially support the OS they are comfortable will work, if product is installed by average end-users. Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:10:57 -0400, Stacey wrote:
kony wrote: but there was a Microsoft patch that updated 98SE to the abilities of WinME. Now there's a scary thought... LOL. Just the same screwed-up driver model, further extended by XP. The patch might be helpful for folks trying to get nForce (or other modern, hardware accelerated) sound working on Win98SE, for example. Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Halfgaar wrote in message ...
Nowadays, more and more hardware manufacuterers are stating win98SE as the minimum required version of windows I was wondering, is this always the case, or are there actually cases where win98SE works and win98 first edition does not? Those IOGear brand GIC220U 2-port USB 2.0 cards that Fry's often features for free after $10 rebate, if they're the version based on the ALi USB 2.0 chip, as almost all are now. The box of the one I got said that Win98 was OK for it, but it worked only in USB 1.1 mode, and it turned out that the box was outdated and meant for the older version of the card, based on the much better NEC USB 2.0 chip (pictures on that box). |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Halfgaar writes:
Nowadays, more and more hardware manufacuterers are stating win98SE as the minimum required version of windows to let the hardware run. PQI (manufacturer of my USB memorystick) is an example. But the drivers also work perfectly with my original Win98. I was wondering, is this always the case, or are there actually cases where win98SE works and win98 first edition does not? It's probably either a question of where the vendor chose to spend its compatibility test resources, or whether there is at least one place in the drivers where the code uses an API documented in W98SE but not in W98gold. Or both. Supporting software that you claim to work on a given platform requires that you test just about every pathological combination possible. It's not a simple "put it on Charlie's machine and if it works, ship it." Quality product testing is expensive, and the vendor may have chosen to do testing only on W98SE and later platforms because it saw little return on investment for testing on earlier machines. And the list of APIs changes at each new major product release. If there is at least one place anywhere in the code that uses an API that is documented in Win98SE but is not in Win98 gold, that's a showstopper for supporting the code on Win98 gold. It may be that the vast majority of users would never cause that API to be invoked (and so might never have any situation in which the code fails under WIN98), but the code is still not compatible with Win98 gold. Joe Morris |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Halfgaar wrote:
kony wrote: WIn98 had initial WDM support, but it was still a bit buggy in some cases. Win98SE had better WDM support, but there was a Microsoft patch that updated 98SE to the abilities of WinME... I don't think that patch will install on WinFE, but maybe manually? (I have no idea.) This patch, will it cripple win98SE so that it will be as bad as ME? Is it still available? And is it a normal patch, or one of those annoying service packs? Maybe I should upgrade to win98SE sometime. I don't want to have to upgrade to 2000 or XP, because then a lot of things I want to do won't work anymore. Maybe I'm wrong but I always thought service pack 1 for 98 was supposed to be the same as 98SE? If not you should be able to find someone who will sell you 98SE pretty cheap now. -- Stacey |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 08 Oct 2003 10:36:04 +0200, Halfgaar
wrote: kony wrote: WIn98 had initial WDM support, but it was still a bit buggy in some cases. Win98SE had better WDM support, but there was a Microsoft patch that updated 98SE to the abilities of WinME... I don't think that patch will install on WinFE, but maybe manually? (I have no idea.) This patch, will it cripple win98SE so that it will be as bad as ME? Is it still available? And is it a normal patch, or one of those annoying service packs? The patch I was referring to just gives 98SE the same WDM audio "level" as ME, nothing more, not the other crap added by WinME. Basically it's just a few files updated IIRC, though I have no idea if those files could be replaced on a Win98FE install or if they'd be inoperable with other earlier file versions from FE. http://www.google.com/search?q=242937usa8.exe If your problem isn't audio or persists (or gets worse) after using the files in this patch, you may also need install the service pack, other updates. I don't recall the exact differences, but after fully patched Win98FE is nearly transformed into 98SE, though IIRC there were a couple of features still lacking like ICS (internet connection sharing) and something else (I can't remember). Naturally you'd want to make backups of the install before making such changes, in case something goes wrong... at least one or two of Mickey's patches could lock out a Win98 system from booting even into safe mode. One such patch had something to do with 1394 support, replaced the systray.exe file with a buggy later version. Maybe I should upgrade to win98SE sometime. I don't want to have to upgrade to 2000 or XP, because then a lot of things I want to do won't work anymore. Win98SE is the best for a legacy-compatible Windows system. I'll probably always have a few boxes running Win98SE for that reason, but it also doesn't hurt that it's far less expensive, these days it's not hard to come upon OEM boxes with licenses. Dave |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Does Windows kill the "bootability" other secondary hard drives it finds with the same OS on? | Kb | General | 3 | September 5th 03 12:33 PM |
My experience with a corrupt Windows XP registry | Wuahn | General | 0 | August 19th 03 08:30 AM |
Windows XP Networking | Jim Turner | General | 3 | August 18th 03 04:58 AM |
Install SB16 or Live Value in FIC VA-503+ with Windows | Woody | General | 2 | July 10th 03 08:28 AM |