If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
AMD introduces 3.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Do I download "memtest" somewhere? Same question for "cdromm".
I shall await your answer before proceeding. Thanks in advance "Wes Newell" wrote in message news:df6Aj.24336$e_.6792@trnddc03... On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 19:45:20 -0500, Ritter 197 wrote: My computer is an AMD 2.20 gigahertz Athlon 64X2 Dual core. The MB is an ASUSTek NODUSM3 1.05, bus Clock 199 megahertz, BIOS is Phoenix Tech LTD 3.06 07/14/2006 I am using WindowsXP. Does this help? "Peter van der Goes" wrote in message ... "Ritter 197" wrote in message . .. How do I overclock an AMD CPU? Put in a memtest boot floppy or cdromm before making any changes. This will keep from screwing up your HDD if when you screw up. In the bios. 1. Lower base ram bus speed 1 level (33MHz real speed). 2. Lower HT bus speed 1 level (from 5x to 4x). 3. Raise vcore .1v from default. 4. Raise system bus speed from 200MHz to 233MHz. Should boot at 11x233.33MHz, about 2567MHz. Now that's a very very simple overclock. And it doesn't touch on the benefits and hazards of doing it. This small OC shouldn't cause any problems, but you never know til you start overclocking a system. If it doesn't boot, you'll probably have to clear cmos, boot and try changing some settings. It would be wise to undersatnd what these settings are and what they do before you get in over your head. There's tons of good (and bad) info on overclocking on the web. 1. Sets the base ram bus lower because raisng the system clock will also raises other clocks. 2. Same as above for the HT bus. 3. Generally more vcore for higher cpu speeds. Will vary. May not even need to raise it. .1v won't hurt it. 4. Pretty self explanatory. -- Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
AMD introduces 3.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Ritter 197 wrote:
Thanks a lot for detailed feedback. I will print it out and try to follow your recommendations. Thanks again On thing I forgot, that Wes caught, was setting the Hypertransport bus speed. Normally, it might be something like 5x200, and not to surpass 1000. If you are bumping the CPU input clock on an Athlon board, then you'd want to drop the multiplier. For example 4x220 would be less than 1000, so a setting of 4 for the multiplier, gives room up to 250MHz for your CPU clock setting. The HT bus setting affects I/O rates, such as PCI Express transfers to memory, but only really becomes noticeable, if you drop it a lot. For example, at 1x200, you'd notice your 3DMark was off quite a bit. The difference between 5x200 and 4x220 would probably not be a big deal. Paul |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
AMD introduces 3.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Thanks again, but I am running into a wall, in that I cannot access the
BIOS. I have been "googling" for HP Pavilion a1610n BIOS and all responses say to hold down the F1 key during startup. That gets me to hard drives, various other tabs (that I was always familiar with before) but never to BIOS. So I do not know how at this time to set it to "manual" as suggested nor can I see whether it is at this automatic. I found the MEMTEST and downloaded it and burned it to a DVD. When I start up with it it seems to run for a very long time tests and the progress is very slow. What I am actually to do with it? "Paul" wrote in message ... Ritter 197 wrote: Thanks a lot for detailed feedback. I will print it out and try to follow your recommendations. Thanks again On thing I forgot, that Wes caught, was setting the Hypertransport bus speed. Normally, it might be something like 5x200, and not to surpass 1000. If you are bumping the CPU input clock on an Athlon board, then you'd want to drop the multiplier. For example 4x220 would be less than 1000, so a setting of 4 for the multiplier, gives room up to 250MHz for your CPU clock setting. The HT bus setting affects I/O rates, such as PCI Express transfers to memory, but only really becomes noticeable, if you drop it a lot. For example, at 1x200, you'd notice your 3DMark was off quite a bit. The difference between 5x200 and 4x220 would probably not be a big deal. Paul |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
AMD introduces 3.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Oh, I forgot to mention that I have an ASUSTek NODUSM3 1.05 Motherboard.
The CPU is AMD 2.20 gigahertz Athlon 64 X2 Dual core, 256 kilobyte L1, 1024 kilobyte L2. "Paul" wrote in message ... Ritter 197 wrote: Thanks a lot for detailed feedback. I will print it out and try to follow your recommendations. Thanks again On thing I forgot, that Wes caught, was setting the Hypertransport bus speed. Normally, it might be something like 5x200, and not to surpass 1000. If you are bumping the CPU input clock on an Athlon board, then you'd want to drop the multiplier. For example 4x220 would be less than 1000, so a setting of 4 for the multiplier, gives room up to 250MHz for your CPU clock setting. The HT bus setting affects I/O rates, such as PCI Express transfers to memory, but only really becomes noticeable, if you drop it a lot. For example, at 1x200, you'd notice your 3DMark was off quite a bit. The difference between 5x200 and 4x220 would probably not be a big deal. Paul |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
AMD introduces 3.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Ritter 197 wrote:
Thanks again, but I am running into a wall, in that I cannot access the BIOS. I have been "googling" for HP Pavilion a1610n BIOS and all responses say to hold down the F1 key during startup. That gets me to hard drives, various other tabs (that I was always familiar with before) but never to BIOS. So I do not know how at this time to set it to "manual" as suggested nor can I see whether it is at this automatic. I found the MEMTEST and downloaded it and burned it to a DVD. When I start up with it it seems to run for a very long time tests and the progress is very slow. What I am actually to do with it? Hmmm. I guess I should have asked more questions :-) OK, so you've got an OEM Asus board, not a retail one. HP provides the support. According to this page, pressing F1 is supposed to be putting you in the BIOS setup. You could try Del instead, because that is what my Asus board uses. Motherboard http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/g...eg_R1002_USEN# A1610N computer http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport...reg_R1002_USEN It is a Media Center, and at least for one other of those (Intel processor), it seemed to be a pretty "closed" box. I hope that is not the case. You can try your hand at overclocking in Windows. The problem there is, your chipset is 6150LE, which is a generation after Clockgen added support for a couple Nvidia chips. The Nvidia chips appear to do clock synthesis inside the chipset, and for the author of Clockgen, it meant only having to support at the chipset level, and not have to custom program every motherboard. So a whole bunch of people gained the ability to overclock some of those closed OEM motherboards. The author has withdrawn Clockgen from his download page, and I'm not sure if there is a problem with the program or not. I've used Clockgen with my current motherboard (using the custom support for the clock generator chip on my motherboard, not Nvidia generic support), and it was a fine program and did exactly what it was supposed to. (Note - archive.org is a huge and slow web site, with a lot of simultaneous requests going to it. You can prepare a meal for yourself, while it loads.) http://web.archive.org/web/200705021...m/clockgen.php This is the Nvidia chipset support listed on that archived copy. * nForce2, nForce3, nForce4, nForce4 SLI Intel Edition clock generators. * Geforce 6100/6150 clock generator. * nForce 590 clock generator. 6150LE comes after 6150, and I would hope they are quite similar. But no guarantees. When Wes recommended "memtest", the purpose is to give you something to boot with, to prove the overclock is stable. If you overclock too far, and boot a Windows boot disk, the registry or other files can get corrupted. You might never get to boot your boot drive again, if that happens. If you check the overclocker sites, there are all sorts of tales of woe like that. (I.e. Stupid guys that boot Windows drives, filled with files they haven't backed up, and then they lose the disk.) What I use for stability testing, is Knoppix or Ubuntu Linux LiveCDs. You get to boot from a CD, and you can even leave all your hard drives disconnected. If the OS crashes, there is nothing to corrupt :-) And you can get a copy of Prime95 from mersenne.org, to do stress testing while in Linux. Prime95 is available in both Linux and Windows versions. But if you're not going to get into the BIOS, or it turns out your BIOS is "feature free", then you'll be in Windows anyway. Just don't push the clock too fast. Assuming you can get Clockgen to work, download this. This is a stress test. If you run this, while using Clockgen, you'll be able to detect when you're getting "close" to the limit. Prime95 stops on the first error it detects. On an unstable machine, it errors in 10 seconds or less. On a stable machine, you should be able to run this for hours. This is a Windows version, and is multicore aware. http://www.mersenne.org/gimps/p95v255a.zip Start the program. When it asks to "Join GIMPS", say No. The custom dialog will pop up. Adjust the quantity of memory down a bit, if you want a bit of spare memory for some other programs to run. On my 1GB machine, the program will test around 760MB of memory or so. You could turn it down to 500MB in a case like that, and leave 260MB for your newsreader etc. Then, you can increase Clockgen a bit at a time, and watch Prime95. Stop before you go too far. That should give you something to work with. I don't know if your BIOS is going to be any fun or not. By not having the BIOS at your disposal, your overclock will be more modest. Some of the settings you're supposed to turn down, won't be accessible. Still, give it a shot, and see how it works out. Paul |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
AMD introduces 3.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 6400+
That is quite a great response and again I will print it out to digest it
all and make no mistakes. I bought the computer from COMP USA before they went under and it was a true HP computer in its HP carton. So I cannot imagine that HP would use an OEM MB. Like I said in another reply, BELARC says it is a ASUSTek NODUSM3 1.05 , bus clock 199 megahertz, BIOS is Phoenix Tech Ltd 3.06 7/14/2006. "Paul" wrote in message ... Ritter 197 wrote: Thanks again, but I am running into a wall, in that I cannot access the BIOS. I have been "googling" for HP Pavilion a1610n BIOS and all responses say to hold down the F1 key during startup. That gets me to hard drives, various other tabs (that I was always familiar with before) but never to BIOS. So I do not know how at this time to set it to "manual" as suggested nor can I see whether it is at this automatic. I found the MEMTEST and downloaded it and burned it to a DVD. When I start up with it it seems to run for a very long time tests and the progress is very slow. What I am actually to do with it? Hmmm. I guess I should have asked more questions :-) OK, so you've got an OEM Asus board, not a retail one. HP provides the support. According to this page, pressing F1 is supposed to be putting you in the BIOS setup. You could try Del instead, because that is what my Asus board uses. Motherboard http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/g...eg_R1002_USEN# A1610N computer http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport...reg_R1002_USEN It is a Media Center, and at least for one other of those (Intel processor), it seemed to be a pretty "closed" box. I hope that is not the case. You can try your hand at overclocking in Windows. The problem there is, your chipset is 6150LE, which is a generation after Clockgen added support for a couple Nvidia chips. The Nvidia chips appear to do clock synthesis inside the chipset, and for the author of Clockgen, it meant only having to support at the chipset level, and not have to custom program every motherboard. So a whole bunch of people gained the ability to overclock some of those closed OEM motherboards. The author has withdrawn Clockgen from his download page, and I'm not sure if there is a problem with the program or not. I've used Clockgen with my current motherboard (using the custom support for the clock generator chip on my motherboard, not Nvidia generic support), and it was a fine program and did exactly what it was supposed to. (Note - archive.org is a huge and slow web site, with a lot of simultaneous requests going to it. You can prepare a meal for yourself, while it loads.) http://web.archive.org/web/200705021...m/clockgen.php This is the Nvidia chipset support listed on that archived copy. * nForce2, nForce3, nForce4, nForce4 SLI Intel Edition clock generators. * Geforce 6100/6150 clock generator. * nForce 590 clock generator. 6150LE comes after 6150, and I would hope they are quite similar. But no guarantees. When Wes recommended "memtest", the purpose is to give you something to boot with, to prove the overclock is stable. If you overclock too far, and boot a Windows boot disk, the registry or other files can get corrupted. You might never get to boot your boot drive again, if that happens. If you check the overclocker sites, there are all sorts of tales of woe like that. (I.e. Stupid guys that boot Windows drives, filled with files they haven't backed up, and then they lose the disk.) What I use for stability testing, is Knoppix or Ubuntu Linux LiveCDs. You get to boot from a CD, and you can even leave all your hard drives disconnected. If the OS crashes, there is nothing to corrupt :-) And you can get a copy of Prime95 from mersenne.org, to do stress testing while in Linux. Prime95 is available in both Linux and Windows versions. But if you're not going to get into the BIOS, or it turns out your BIOS is "feature free", then you'll be in Windows anyway. Just don't push the clock too fast. Assuming you can get Clockgen to work, download this. This is a stress test. If you run this, while using Clockgen, you'll be able to detect when you're getting "close" to the limit. Prime95 stops on the first error it detects. On an unstable machine, it errors in 10 seconds or less. On a stable machine, you should be able to run this for hours. This is a Windows version, and is multicore aware. http://www.mersenne.org/gimps/p95v255a.zip Start the program. When it asks to "Join GIMPS", say No. The custom dialog will pop up. Adjust the quantity of memory down a bit, if you want a bit of spare memory for some other programs to run. On my 1GB machine, the program will test around 760MB of memory or so. You could turn it down to 500MB in a case like that, and leave 260MB for your newsreader etc. Then, you can increase Clockgen a bit at a time, and watch Prime95. Stop before you go too far. That should give you something to work with. I don't know if your BIOS is going to be any fun or not. By not having the BIOS at your disposal, your overclock will be more modest. Some of the settings you're supposed to turn down, won't be accessible. Still, give it a shot, and see how it works out. Paul |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
AMD introduces 3.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Paul I have downloaded the ClockGen and the other piece 95 etc.
On the ClockGen I see: CPU 2216.1, FSB 201.7, RAM 246.2, PCIE 100.0, PCI 33.3 It apparently lets me get into the BIOS this way (correct ?) since I can change the various speeds. But do you have a conservative suggestion to a newbie at this time (but not computer illiterate) what settings I should give a try? Thanks for watching and your response! "Paul" wrote in message ... Ritter 197 wrote: Thanks again, but I am running into a wall, in that I cannot access the BIOS. I have been "googling" for HP Pavilion a1610n BIOS and all responses say to hold down the F1 key during startup. That gets me to hard drives, various other tabs (that I was always familiar with before) but never to BIOS. So I do not know how at this time to set it to "manual" as suggested nor can I see whether it is at this automatic. I found the MEMTEST and downloaded it and burned it to a DVD. When I start up with it it seems to run for a very long time tests and the progress is very slow. What I am actually to do with it? Hmmm. I guess I should have asked more questions :-) OK, so you've got an OEM Asus board, not a retail one. HP provides the support. According to this page, pressing F1 is supposed to be putting you in the BIOS setup. You could try Del instead, because that is what my Asus board uses. Motherboard http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/g...eg_R1002_USEN# A1610N computer http://h20000.www2.hp.com/bizsupport...reg_R1002_USEN It is a Media Center, and at least for one other of those (Intel processor), it seemed to be a pretty "closed" box. I hope that is not the case. You can try your hand at overclocking in Windows. The problem there is, your chipset is 6150LE, which is a generation after Clockgen added support for a couple Nvidia chips. The Nvidia chips appear to do clock synthesis inside the chipset, and for the author of Clockgen, it meant only having to support at the chipset level, and not have to custom program every motherboard. So a whole bunch of people gained the ability to overclock some of those closed OEM motherboards. The author has withdrawn Clockgen from his download page, and I'm not sure if there is a problem with the program or not. I've used Clockgen with my current motherboard (using the custom support for the clock generator chip on my motherboard, not Nvidia generic support), and it was a fine program and did exactly what it was supposed to. (Note - archive.org is a huge and slow web site, with a lot of simultaneous requests going to it. You can prepare a meal for yourself, while it loads.) http://web.archive.org/web/200705021...m/clockgen.php This is the Nvidia chipset support listed on that archived copy. * nForce2, nForce3, nForce4, nForce4 SLI Intel Edition clock generators. * Geforce 6100/6150 clock generator. * nForce 590 clock generator. 6150LE comes after 6150, and I would hope they are quite similar. But no guarantees. When Wes recommended "memtest", the purpose is to give you something to boot with, to prove the overclock is stable. If you overclock too far, and boot a Windows boot disk, the registry or other files can get corrupted. You might never get to boot your boot drive again, if that happens. If you check the overclocker sites, there are all sorts of tales of woe like that. (I.e. Stupid guys that boot Windows drives, filled with files they haven't backed up, and then they lose the disk.) What I use for stability testing, is Knoppix or Ubuntu Linux LiveCDs. You get to boot from a CD, and you can even leave all your hard drives disconnected. If the OS crashes, there is nothing to corrupt :-) And you can get a copy of Prime95 from mersenne.org, to do stress testing while in Linux. Prime95 is available in both Linux and Windows versions. But if you're not going to get into the BIOS, or it turns out your BIOS is "feature free", then you'll be in Windows anyway. Just don't push the clock too fast. Assuming you can get Clockgen to work, download this. This is a stress test. If you run this, while using Clockgen, you'll be able to detect when you're getting "close" to the limit. Prime95 stops on the first error it detects. On an unstable machine, it errors in 10 seconds or less. On a stable machine, you should be able to run this for hours. This is a Windows version, and is multicore aware. http://www.mersenne.org/gimps/p95v255a.zip Start the program. When it asks to "Join GIMPS", say No. The custom dialog will pop up. Adjust the quantity of memory down a bit, if you want a bit of spare memory for some other programs to run. On my 1GB machine, the program will test around 760MB of memory or so. You could turn it down to 500MB in a case like that, and leave 260MB for your newsreader etc. Then, you can increase Clockgen a bit at a time, and watch Prime95. Stop before you go too far. That should give you something to work with. I don't know if your BIOS is going to be any fun or not. By not having the BIOS at your disposal, your overclock will be more modest. Some of the settings you're supposed to turn down, won't be accessible. Still, give it a shot, and see how it works out. Paul |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
AMD introduces 3.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Ritter 197 wrote:
Paul I have downloaded the ClockGen and the other piece 95 etc. On the ClockGen I see: CPU 2216.1, FSB 201.7, RAM 246.2, PCIE 100.0, PCI 33.3 It apparently lets me get into the BIOS this way (correct ?) since I can change the various speeds. But do you have a conservative suggestion to a newbie at this time (but not computer illiterate) what settings I should give a try? Thanks for watching and your response! "FSB" is your CPU input clock. 200MHz would be the nominal speed. You'd follow the same recipe I gave before. 1) Start up Clockgen, but don't adjust anything yet. 2) Fire up Prime95. Start it running. With no overclock, it should not be reporting errors. Prime95 will throw an error, when you've overclocked too far. 3) Now, use Clockgen. Go in 5MHz steps. Nominal is 200MHz, and then you'd try 205MHz, 210MHz and so on. Wait 10 minutes between steps. That is to give time for Prime95 to find an error. If you get an error, dial down one step. Then, start Prime95 again, and run it for at least 4 hours error free. If it is clean, then that speed may be pretty close to your new overclock speed. Running a game like Crysis, is another test, and you may find the clock has to be dropped another 5MHz, to keep Crysis running. (Insert the name of your favorite 3D game there...) The reason for taking small steps, is to overclock your system without crashing it. The PCIE and PCI should be locked, and as you dial up "FSB", they shouldn't move. And as long as they don't move, then they won't upset their respective subsystems. I don't know how the SATA ports are clocked on your motherboard. On some motherboards, when you overclock, the SATA clock goes up as well. And that can lead to problems with the disks. On one motherboard, of the four SATA ports, two were affected and two were OK. But you cannot find that kind of information just anywhere. If you have no choice, but to go the Windows route to try this, then make a complete backup copy of your Windows disk. Then, if something happens to your hard drive, you have a fallback plan, and a way to restore your disk. Paul |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
AMD introduces 3.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 6400+
On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 18:47:24 -0500, Ritter 197 wrote:
Do I download "memtest" somewhere? Same question for "cdromm". I shall await your answer before proceeding. Thanks in advance You can download memtest86, cdromm was a typo just maening a boot cdrom disc with memtest on it. There's also a boot floppy version of memtest if you prefer. Some Linux distros also have memtest as an option when you boot them. -- Want the ultimate in free OTA SD/HDTV Recorder? http://mythtv.org My Tivo Experience http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/tivo.htm Tivo HD/S3 compared http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/mythtivo.htm AMD cpu help http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
AMD introduces 3.2GHz Athlon 64 X2 6400+
Good morning, at least here on the East coast of the US!
I cannot get the "95" etc to work this morning. It always starts up and then says it encountered an error and needs to shut down. "Debug" and option does apparently nothing because it does the same the next time. I tried downloading it again and suddenly when extracting the files it wants a password (which it never asked before and therefore is not set up) I guess I am stuck for some reason at this point. Do you think Removing the application and trying to download then might be an option? "Paul" wrote in message ... Ritter 197 wrote: Paul I have downloaded the ClockGen and the other piece 95 etc. On the ClockGen I see: CPU 2216.1, FSB 201.7, RAM 246.2, PCIE 100.0, PCI 33.3 It apparently lets me get into the BIOS this way (correct ?) since I can change the various speeds. But do you have a conservative suggestion to a newbie at this time (but not computer illiterate) what settings I should give a try? Thanks for watching and your response! "FSB" is your CPU input clock. 200MHz would be the nominal speed. You'd follow the same recipe I gave before. 1) Start up Clockgen, but don't adjust anything yet. 2) Fire up Prime95. Start it running. With no overclock, it should not be reporting errors. Prime95 will throw an error, when you've overclocked too far. 3) Now, use Clockgen. Go in 5MHz steps. Nominal is 200MHz, and then you'd try 205MHz, 210MHz and so on. Wait 10 minutes between steps. That is to give time for Prime95 to find an error. If you get an error, dial down one step. Then, start Prime95 again, and run it for at least 4 hours error free. If it is clean, then that speed may be pretty close to your new overclock speed. Running a game like Crysis, is another test, and you may find the clock has to be dropped another 5MHz, to keep Crysis running. (Insert the name of your favorite 3D game there...) The reason for taking small steps, is to overclock your system without crashing it. The PCIE and PCI should be locked, and as you dial up "FSB", they shouldn't move. And as long as they don't move, then they won't upset their respective subsystems. I don't know how the SATA ports are clocked on your motherboard. On some motherboards, when you overclock, the SATA clock goes up as well. And that can lead to problems with the disks. On one motherboard, of the four SATA ports, two were affected and two were OK. But you cannot find that kind of information just anywhere. If you have no choice, but to go the Windows route to try this, then make a complete backup copy of your Windows disk. Then, if something happens to your hard drive, you have a fallback plan, and a way to restore your disk. Paul |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is 143 degrees(F) considered too hot for an AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 2.2GHz 512KB Socket 754 CPU? | [email protected] | General | 12 | January 20th 05 12:06 AM |
Is 143 degrees(F) considered too hot for an AMD Athlon 64 3200+ 2.2GHz 512KB Socket 754 CPU? | [email protected] | AMD x86-64 Processors | 12 | January 17th 05 12:48 PM |
AMD Athlon 64 3200+ vs Pentium 4 3.2ghz | Simon Lee | General | 16 | September 17th 04 04:18 AM |
WinBook introduces 64-bit Athlon system | The little lost angel | General | 0 | December 6th 03 08:57 AM |
1.2GHz Athlon or 1.3GHz Duron? | John Carlyle-Clarke | General | 2 | October 10th 03 11:48 PM |