If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR
.. ========================================
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article t.com, smh wrote:
.. ======================================== GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. Where the hell in any of my posts did i ever break a NDA????? Nothing i posted was copywrited, protected,NDA type syuff. I never posted any fraudulent results. Sue me you pussy!!!! DO NOT use my posts in ANY of your rants from now one. or i'll personally make it a jihad of mine to make sure you have no usenet access from any paid souces again. BTW, why do you refuse in your posts to name the other person related to my posts. In other words you made most of what is there up. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using an ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Mikey Richter (Lying Scum) on NDA: (Excerpted) ================================================== ============== From: smh Subject: Adaptec TakeTwo: === Response to Mike Richter === Date: 11/28/99 Mike Richter (Acraptec Shill) wrote: When you returned after a hiatus (or an exile as somebody called it), you shouted very excitedly what a wonderful product Take Two is and further added that it alone is worth the price of ECDC4, and it did backup your system just wonderfully. When Adaptec ****ed up almost all the functionality of ECDC4, your suggestion that Take Two is bug free was hard to take. Sorry about that. I report what I know and what I can subject to NDA. You can take the NDA and shove it up to you know where. I will not violate my word in the NDA on beta results. One more time: Take that NDA and shove it up to you know where. ================================================== ============== ======================================== GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ===================================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ===================================== |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Just ignore him GMAN, smh is the resident physcopatchic stalker,
bull****ter and all round basket case. No one takes any notice of his rants so theres no point in replying as you wont get a coherant answer or one shred of proof to back his claims. In article , said... In article t.com, smh wrote: .. ======================================== GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. Where the hell in any of my posts did i ever break a NDA????? Nothing i posted was copywrited, protected,NDA type syuff. I never posted any fraudulent results. Sue me you pussy!!!! DO NOT use my posts in ANY of your rants from now one. or i'll personally make it a jihad of mine to make sure you have no usenet access from any paid souces again. BTW, why do you refuse in your posts to name the other person related to my posts. In other words you made most of what is there up. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using an ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Adrian Miller (Acraptec) on NDA: ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: Adaptec 4.0 Take Two Date: 11/24/99 Do you know whether beta testers reported any cases where system were not restored properly? That sort of info is covered by the NDA, which I have signed as well. ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: Adrian Miller, why do you not respond to these? Date: 3/12/01 Why don't you respond to these: ------------------------------------ Easy CD Creator 5 does not do Mode 1 ------------------------------------ NDA You are the weakest link, good-bye. ======================= . ======================================== GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
========================================
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. Mikey Richter (Lying Scum) on NDA: (Excerpted) ================================================== ============== From: smh Subject: Adaptec TakeTwo: === Response to Mike Richter === Date: 11/28/99 Mike Richter (Acraptec Shill) wrote: When you returned after a hiatus (or an exile as somebody called it), you shouted very excitedly what a wonderful product Take Two is and further added that it alone is worth the price of ECDC4, and it did backup your system just wonderfully. When Adaptec ****ed up almost all the functionality of ECDC4, your suggestion that Take Two is bug free was hard to take. Sorry about that. I report what I know and what I can subject to NDA. You can take the NDA and shove it up to you know where. I will not violate my word in the NDA on beta results. One more time: Take that NDA and shove it up to you know where. ================================================== ============== (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ===================================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ===================================== |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
========================================
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. Adrian Miller (Acraptec) on NDA: ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: Adaptec 4.0 Take Two Date: 11/24/99 Do you know whether beta testers reported any cases where system were not restored properly? That sort of info is covered by the NDA, which I have signed as well. ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: Adrian Miller, why do you not respond to these? Date: 3/12/01 Why don't you respond to these: ------------------------------------ Easy CD Creator 5 does not do Mode 1 ------------------------------------ NDA You are the weakest link, good-bye. ======================= (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
========================================
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= Not detected the bug because testers were using SCSI based drives? ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: 8X disk to disk, is it possible? Date: 11/22/99 I want to do disk to disk at 8X if possible, Easy Cd Creator 4.0 tells me the source drive (a new Pioneer 40X SCSI) is not fast enough and wants to cache to the hdd first then write at 8x, defeating the purpose. As someone else pointed out there is a bug in the systems tests that is going to be addressed shortly. ======================= ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
========================================
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= Not detected the bug because testers were using Plextors OR scsi? Not detected the bug when even Plextor AND scsi showed the behavior? ======================= From: handercrander Subject: Problems with Easy CD_COPIER 4.0 at 8x Date: 9/22/99 I have a plextor plexwriter 8/2/20 cd-writer, and a ultraplex 40max [SCSI] cdrom With easy cd copier 3.5c I had no problems to copy at 8x speed, but with the new version it "forces" to copy to the harddisk first. The same happens at 6x. I can only copy on the fly at 4x !!! ======================= ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Toshiba DVD Drive problem | Bob L | General | 7 | January 11th 05 03:02 PM |
Some CDr brands degrade within months article | Who Me? | Cdr | 34 | October 21st 03 08:29 PM |
Mike Richter is a LIAR (no secret)(ii) | smh | Cdr | 23 | September 11th 03 07:06 PM |
(OT) Software Customer Bill of Rights | smh | Cdr | 5 | September 4th 03 09:55 PM |
Mike Richter is a LIAR (aspi/win2k)(iv) | smh | Cdr | 21 | September 4th 03 04:54 PM |