If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is Class 1 laser safe enough for baby eyes?
I meant, what if someone accidentally shine Class 1 laser into a baby's eyes? Would it hurt retina and leave a permanent damage? I know ... I know... it should NOT happen. Adults are supposed to be very very careful. -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is Class 1 laser safe enough for baby eyes?
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
I meant, what if someone accidentally shine Class 1 laser into a baby's eyes? Would it hurt retina and leave a permanent damage? I know ... I know... it should NOT happen. Adults are supposed to be very very careful. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_safety#Class_1 "A Class 1 laser is safe under all conditions of normal use. This means the maximum permissible exposure (MPE) cannot be exceeded when viewing a laser with the naked eye or with the aid of typical magnifying optics (e.g. telescope or microscope). To verify compliance, the standard specifies the aperture and distance corresponding to the naked eye, a typical telescope viewing a collimated beam, and a typical microscope viewing a divergent beam. It is important to realize that certain lasers classified as Class 1 may still pose a hazard when viewed with a telescope or microscope of sufficiently large aperture. For example, a high-power laser with a very large collimated beam or very highly divergent beam may be classified as Class 1 if the power that passes through the apertures defined in the standard is less than the AEL for Class 1; however, an unsafe power level may be collected by a magnifying optic with larger aperture." Looks like that baby is safe. Nothing to worry about. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is Class 1 laser safe enough for baby eyes?
On 7/31/2018 8:13 PM, Paul wrote:
... *** however, an unsafe power level may be collected by a *** magnifying optic with larger aperture." Looks like that baby is safe. Nothing to worry about. There are counters with handheld laser scanner. And those handheld scanners are NOT placed carefully to avoid customers, at least I saw that in Hong Kong. Did they do it deliberately? Is it a secret laser experiment? Well... -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is Class 1 laser safe enough for baby eyes?
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 7/31/2018 8:13 PM, Paul wrote: ... however, an unsafe power level may be collected by a magnifying optic with larger aperture." Looks like that baby is safe. Nothing to worry about. There are counters with handheld laser scanner. And those handheld scanners are NOT placed carefully to avoid customers, at least I saw that in Hong Kong. Did they do it deliberately? Is it a secret laser experiment? Well... All laser experiments are secret. Didn't you see the sign outside the laser lab, before entering the room ? https://www.repairfaq.org/sam/cl3barg2.gif The lab may also have a light bulb and sign, indicating an experiment is in progress. My chemistry professor had an argon-ion laser. And he had various safety features on the lab to keep people out. And guess what injury my professor had. His eyeballs were fine. But, he was deaf in one ear, from previously using a *pulse* laser. The sound during the discharge, can slowly damage your hearing. You're supposed to wear ear protection, but he neglected to wear his ear protection headset. Now he has paid the price, in that his hearing in one ear (the ear facing the machinery) is now almost gone. The new laser he has to replace it, is CW (no more hearing damage). And in a comedic moment, he still wears his hearing protection now :-) I thought that was pretty funny. If you only have one ear left, I guess you'll over-protect it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser "In a continuous wave (CW) laser, the balance of pump power against gain saturation and cavity losses produces an equilibrium value of the laser power inside the cavity; this equilibrium determines the operating point of the laser. " And the output of that laser, would look a lot like this. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...rtechnik06.jpg "This argon-ion laser emits blue-green light at 488 and 514 nm" And babies weren't allowed in the lab. Neither were visitors. I couldn't see inside the lab (even though the laser was off). I only got to see the door of the lab. https://www.lasermet.com/images/warning_signs.jpg More than one member of the chemistry department had hearing loss. Some experiments involved a capacitor bank and arc discharge (which gives off ultrasonic sound during the discharge). And ear protection headsets are so cheap... Our laser lab at work, had a door on the front that looked like a bank vault. A big metal door, intended to scare the curious away. The cleaners weren't even allowed inside, to mop the floors. And my magnetic stripe badge wouldn't let me in there either (no, I didn't test this :-) ). So if lasers were secret, they were hiding something in there. Something that needed a big metal door. What could it be ??? I guess we'll never know. No, they don't do laser work in there any more... I know you're interested and all. The days of that lab are now over with (not commercially viable). Still, the lab had a nice front door, as that's all I could ever see. The door had no window in it either. You could not "sneak a peek". You couldn't hold a baby up to a window or anything, to test for laser light. Paul |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is Class 1 laser safe enough for baby eyes?
On 7/31/2018 9:40 PM, Paul wrote:
... No, they don't do laser work in there any more... I know you're interested and all. The days of that lab are now over with (not commercially viable). Still, the lab had a nice front door, as that's all I could ever see. The door had no window in it either. You could not "sneak a peek". You couldn't hold a baby up to a window or anything, to test for laser light. I think I had seen a YouTube video that taught you to convert a laser head from a DVD drive into a laser cutter. I forgot the link... Can the same be done to those POS (Point-Of-Sale) handheld laser scanner? I dunno... -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is Class 1 laser safe enough for baby eyes?
On 07/31/2018 09:03 AM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 7/31/2018 8:13 PM, Paul wrote: ... **** however, an unsafe power level may be collected by a **** magnifying optic with larger aperture." Looks like that baby is safe. Nothing to worry about. There are counters with handheld laser scanner. And those handheld scanners are NOT placed carefully to avoid customers, at least I saw that in Hong Kong. Did they do it deliberately? Is it a secret laser experiment? Well... That beam is moving so fast that the dwell time on the retina is really, really short--probably tens of microseconds. That helps a lot. Cheers Phil Hobbs -- Dr Philip C D Hobbs Principal Consultant ElectroOptical Innovations LLC / Hobbs ElectroOptics Optics, Electro-optics, Photonics, Analog Electronics Briarcliff Manor NY 10510 http://electrooptical.net http://hobbs-eo.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Class 1 laser safe, output power and accidents
Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
On 7/31/2018 8:13 PM, Paul wrote: however, an unsafe power level may be collected by a magnifying optic with larger aperture." So all we need is an "accident" to hurt some babies' eyes? Which will force them to see eye doctors and pay some treatment? Or maybe buying a few pair glasses? Oh well, I agree, it'll be good business. The laser scanners have already been tested on "bad" babies, so no new babies need be sacrificed. (Baby testing. This is the drop test...) http://www.unrulylittlethings.com/wp...flyingbaby.jpg ******* And what treatment is there for a retinal burn ? I don't think there is any treatment, except for the doctor to say he can't help you. Paul |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is Class 1 laser safe enough for baby eyes?
On 7/31/2018 10:44 PM, Shadow wrote:
Accusing your government of maiming and killing people AGAIN.... Dunno, Mai Pang Wong (Mr). Do you have a death wish ? Wrong, we are talking about laser scanner safety. Should there be a rule if not a law to prevent people from pointing laser at humans? -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is Class 1 laser safe enough for baby eyes?
On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 21:03:55 +0800, "Mr. Man-wai Chang"
wrote: There are counters with handheld laser scanner. And those handheld scanners are NOT placed carefully to avoid customers, at least I saw that in Hong Kong. Did they do it deliberately? Is it a secret laser experiment? Well... The most obvious answer would be that they did it the most economical way, without any regard or concerns for customers or cashiers. It's pretty easy to "see" conspiracy everywhere, if you are diligent enough. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is Class 1 laser safe enough for baby eyes?
On 8/1/2018 3:19 AM, George Herold wrote:
I think class 1 is less than 1mW in the visible. We sell a class 3B laser.. it's in the NIR... no blink reflex. (I always encourage people to buy extra laser goggles.) Do you trust and buy Class 1 laser products manufactured by Chinese and Asians? -- @~@ Remain silent! Drink, Blink, Stretch! Live long and prosper!! / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! /( _ )\ May the Force and farces be with you! ^ ^ (x86_64 Ubuntu 9.10) Linux 2.6.39.3 不借貸! 不詐騙! 不*錢! 不援交! 不打交! 不打劫! 不自殺! 不求神! 請考慮綜援 (CSSA): http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The first womens Zenith collection Ill go over is the Baby Doll collection. There is an astounding 18 watches to choose from just within the Baby Doll collection. One of the unique watches within this collection is the Baby Star Elite, which offers | [email protected] | AMD x86-64 Processors | 0 | April 26th 08 06:21 PM |
Safe to store external HD in bank safe deposit box? | Danny Kewl | General | 5 | December 29th 04 09:27 PM |
Is UV bad for your eyes? | Cyde Weys | General | 1 | December 19th 04 10:59 PM |
Eyes get used to certain refresh rate ? | Arash Dejkam | Nvidia Videocards | 17 | February 3rd 04 10:30 AM |
Run your expert eyes over this please? | Toby Newman | Overclocking AMD Processors | 0 | August 28th 03 10:06 AM |