If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What about LCD monitors?
Any hands-on experienced opinions with LCD monitors? They are both lighter and more energy efficient? I have a 19 inch ViewSonic PF790 (middle to high end) old monitor that still looks great. It is big and heavy, but that is not an issue. What LCD monitor would match the picture and size of that monitor? How much better is 24 over 22 inch? What are the usable screen dimensions, width times height? Thanks. -- I have asked similar before, but LCD monitors are constantly improving AFAIK. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What about LCD monitors?
"John Doe" wrote in message ... Any hands-on experienced opinions with LCD monitors? They are both lighter and more energy efficient? I have a 19 inch ViewSonic PF790 (middle to high end) old monitor that still looks great. It is big and heavy, but that is not an issue. What LCD monitor would match the picture and size of that monitor? How much better is 24 over 22 inch? What are the usable screen dimensions, width times height? Thanks. I love my LCD's. The picture is sharp and clear, response is v-fast, and absolutely no distortion on the outer edges. Any 19" LCD standard monitor will meet or exceed the screen size of a standard 19" CRT. I have a 20" Dell LCD monitor (by Samsung) that is 16" wide by 12" tall viewable. I have a 19" Dell LCD that is 15" wide x 12" tall. Most of the larger monitors I've looked at are "letterbox" shaped or "widescreen". Most of these are also right around 12" tall. I opted not for the widescreen because my most common tasks involve documents, spreadsheets, and webpages, so more height is preferred than width. But people who play games and watch TV & movies love the 16:9 aspect ratio. Nice thing is that you can physically rotate an LCD to be tall and thin. But I'm too lazy to do the manual switching required. So I go with square(ish). |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What about LCD monitors?
In article , John Doe
says... Any hands-on experienced opinions with LCD monitors? They are both lighter and more energy efficient? I have a 19 inch ViewSonic PF790 (middle to high end) old monitor that still looks great. It is big and heavy, but that is not an issue. What LCD monitor would match the picture and size of that monitor? 17" although probably not as high resolution. How much better is 24 over 22 inch? What are the usable screen dimensions, width times height? On a LCD, the size quoted is the usable screen size. -- Conor I only please one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow isn't looking good either. - Scott Adams |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What about LCD monitors?
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:19:24 GMT, John Doe wrote:
| | Any hands-on experienced opinions with LCD monitors? They are both | lighter and more energy efficient? | | I have a 19 inch ViewSonic PF790 (middle to high end) old monitor that | still looks great. It is big and heavy, but that is not an issue. What | LCD monitor would match the picture and size of that monitor? | | How much better is 24 over 22 inch? What are the usable screen | dimensions, width times height? | | Thanks. I got rid of a 21" ViewSonic for a 19" 4:3 NEC LCD. The pic is much better on the NEC and is only very slightly smaller than the visible pic area on the ViewSonic. I've since moved the NEC to my second system and bought a 24" 16:10 Samsung as my main monitor. I love it! If you're thinking of moving to a widescreen (16:10 or 16:9*) LCD monitor, a 22" would have a viewable screen height similar to the viewable height on your 19" ViewSonic (multiplying screen size of a 4:3 by 1.22 will give you the approximate widescreen size that has a similar height). The viewable dimensions on my Samsung are about 20 3/8" wide by 12 3/4" high. *HDTV screens are 16:9, but larger widescreen monitors are often 16:10. For instance, my Samsung 24" native resolution is 1920x1200 pixels. Similar size 16:9 monitors are 1920x1080. Larc |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What about LCD monitors?
"John Doe" wrote in message
... Any hands-on experienced opinions with LCD monitors? They are both lighter and more energy efficient? I have a 19 inch ViewSonic PF790 (middle to high end) old monitor that still looks great. It is big and heavy, but that is not an issue. What LCD monitor would match the picture and size of that monitor? How much better is 24 over 22 inch? What are the usable screen dimensions, width times height? There are MANY levels of LCD monitors, just as there were many levels of CRT monitors... The higher-end Samsungs have been excellent performers and reasonable values, though their lower-end line has had less than stellar performance. I have 2 higher-end Samsungs, of 2 distinctly different generations (3 years different), and they are both VERY nice, even compared to my old Trinitrons. Read individual specs for individual screen dimensions. If you value screen height, the "wide screen" sizes may not impress you as much as the diagonal measurement may suggest. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What about LCD monitors?
"John Doe" wrote in message ... Any hands-on experienced opinions with LCD monitors? They are both lighter and more energy efficient? I have a 19 inch ViewSonic PF790 (middle to high end) old monitor that still looks great. It is big and heavy, but that is not an issue. What LCD monitor would match the picture and size of that monitor? How much better is 24 over 22 inch? What are the usable screen dimensions, width times height? Thanks. -- I have asked similar before, but LCD monitors are constantly improving AFAIK. I do like the Samsung Syncmaster series. I have had the occasion to use their 3 year warranty, not because of a faulty LCD but the stand would not tilt after a couple of years. The unit was replaced within a day and that unit then had a faulty LCD and that was replaced in a day. The replacement has been excellent and so was their CS. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What about LCD monitors?
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 21:19:24 GMT, John Doe
wrote: Any hands-on experienced opinions with LCD monitors? They are both lighter and more energy efficient? I have a 19 inch ViewSonic PF790 (middle to high end) old monitor that still looks great. It is big and heavy, but that is not an issue. What LCD monitor would match the picture and size of that monitor? How much better is 24 over 22 inch? What are the usable screen dimensions, width times height? Thanks. LCD Monitors come in three basic flavors: TN - lower end inexpensive monitors with fast response times and typically narrow viewing angles, although some have better viewing angles than others. PA - mid range monitors with better color display and viewing angles. The trade off is slower response times, althought some are close to the TN panels. IPS - high end monitors with the best viewing angle and fair response times and are the best for high end graphics work. The trade off is that they are much more expensive than the other types. I currently have two NEC 24" TN monitors for CADD work and the screen real estate is phenominal. There is however a noticable fade in the vibrance at the outer limits of the viewing angle. A co-worker has a NEC 21" PA monitor that is sharp as a tack and is what I would have chosen had they been available to me. We currently run the gamut from cheap Dell 17" (I wouldn't touch these) to 22" NEC and Dell monitors (fair). I strongly suggest that you research a little to find the type of monitor that will suit your needs. If you are into gaming, a sharp monitor with slow response times probably won't suit your needs. Finally, with that knowledge in hand, take a look for yourself. HTH Bill |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What about LCD monitors?
On Sun, 19 Apr 2009 07:14:28 -0400, Bill
wrote: Any hands-on experienced opinions with LCD monitors? They are both lighter and more energy efficient? I have a 19 inch ViewSonic PF790 (middle to high end) old monitor that still looks great. It is big and heavy, but that is not an issue. What LCD monitor would match the picture and size of that monitor? How much better is 24 over 22 inch? What are the usable screen dimensions, width times height? Thanks. LCD Monitors come in three basic flavors: TN - lower end inexpensive monitors with fast response times and typically narrow viewing angles, although some have better viewing angles than others. PA - mid range monitors with better color display and viewing angles. The trade off is slower response times, althought some are close to the TN panels. IPS - high end monitors with the best viewing angle and fair response times and are the best for high end graphics work. The trade off is that they are much more expensive than the other types. Where is the VA panels in this three groups ? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What about LCD monitors?
In article , "TVeblen" wrote:
"John Doe" wrote in message . .. Any hands-on experienced opinions with LCD monitors? They are both lighter and more energy efficient? I have a 19 inch ViewSonic PF790 (middle to high end) old monitor that still looks great. It is big and heavy, but that is not an issue. What LCD monitor would match the picture and size of that monitor? How much better is 24 over 22 inch? What are the usable screen dimensions, width times height? Thanks. I love my LCD's. The picture is sharp and clear, response is v-fast, and absolutely no distortion on the outer edges. Any 19" LCD standard monitor will meet or exceed the screen size of a standard 19" CRT. I have a 20" Dell LCD monitor (by Samsung) that is 16" wide by 12" tall viewable. I have a 19" Dell LCD that is 15" wide x 12" tall. Most of the larger monitors I've looked at are "letterbox" shaped or "widescreen". Most of these are also right around 12" tall. I opted not for the widescreen because my most common tasks involve documents, spreadsheets, and webpages, so more height is preferred than width. But people who play games and watch TV & movies love the 16:9 aspect ratio. Nice thing is that you can physically rotate an LCD to be tall and thin. But I'm too lazy to do the manual switching required. So I go with square(ish). My 24" Acer monitor can side by side display 2 full sized 8x11 documents perfectly. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What about LCD monitors?
On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 17:55:46 -0400, "TVeblen"
wrote: "John Doe" wrote in message .. . Any hands-on experienced opinions with LCD monitors? They are both lighter and more energy efficient? Not to hijack this thread, but, what is the consensus on leaving an LCD on after shutting down the 'puter. Should you turn the monitor off or just let it sit there in sleep mode? Which is best for the monitor? -- The seabat Filtering GoogleGroups & Goobers with extreme prejudice! Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LCD Monitors -- LCD Monitors -- Description of Basic Specifications | [email protected] | Homebuilt PC's | 2 | January 4th 06 12:30 AM |
What groups are there for monitors and LCD monitors? | Jacko | General | 0 | September 27th 04 09:51 PM |
monitors | martin speirs | General Hardware | 1 | December 2nd 03 06:08 AM |
too many monitors | Joe Slaney | Nvidia Videocards | 1 | October 13th 03 06:53 PM |
Dual monitors: 'Allow taskbar to span multiple monitors' | Patrick Flaherty | Nvidia Videocards | 2 | July 15th 03 03:46 PM |