If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Memory Timing - 1T vs 2T
I'm not sure what setting in memory timings this relates to, but, from
what I've been reading, if you put four 512Meg (double-sided) memory sticks in a Socket 939 motherboard (and probably others also, I would guess), the only way you can run the FSB at 200MHz is to use a setting of 2T, as opposed to the faster 1T if only 2 modules were installed. My question is - how much of an impact does this have, realistically speaking? Is this something that can be easily felt? I already have 512Meg, double sided modules. Am I doing myself an injustice if I *don't* go out and by myself a few single sided modules? TIA ==steven |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
still got performance problems with P4P800-E and Prescott | Johnny | Asus Motherboards | 13 | December 2nd 04 04:48 PM |
16mb buffer hard drive in a laptop | Dan Irwin | Storage (alternative) | 49 | November 4th 04 05:18 PM |
Intel COO signals willingness to go with AMD64!! | Yousuf Khan | General | 136 | February 16th 04 11:31 PM |
Pentium 4 HT vs dual XEON | Mike | Intel | 22 | July 21st 03 07:07 PM |
Memory timing | Thomas Andersson | Overclocking AMD Processors | 2 | June 28th 03 03:56 AM |