If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
File Servers vs NAS?
Hi all... another new person to the world of file servers.
Im looking into using an old computer, beefing it up a bit, and using it for a home office storage unit. Also, Im looking into the 'home media center' thing where wireless adapters that plug into stereos or tvs stream data off of computers. And just recently I heard of network attached storage. What is the difference between the two? Some of the devices I have looked at for an mp3 device for a stereo require certain software be installed (which I suppose means either a computer or a file server). One will accept NAS. Is the real difference that file serves can run programs and things other than hard drives, and NAS cannot? Thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:49:11 -0000, Theo wrote:
Hi all... another new person to the world of file servers. Im looking into using an old computer, beefing it up a bit, and using it for a home office storage unit. Also, Im looking into the 'home media center' thing where wireless adapters that plug into stereos or tvs stream data off of computers. And just recently I heard of network attached storage. What is the difference between the two? Some of the devices I have looked at for an mp3 device for a stereo require certain software be installed (which I suppose means either a computer or a file server). One will accept NAS. Is the real difference that file serves can run programs and things other than hard drives, and NAS cannot? Thanks Depends on the NAS and file server. Unless you get a NAS appliance a file server usually runs a windows or unix OS, so they too can run applications all while serving files to clients over the network. NAS is just the description and technology used for accessing files over the network. It's not an application itself. If the server that holds the files has an OS that can run apps then ..... If it has a proprietary OS designed to only do file sharing (NetApp or BueArc come to mind) then no, you can't run other apps on it. Heck, almost anything can be a file server and used as a NAS device. All that's required is a network and the ability to give file access to other users/hosts. My home PC acts as NAS since another computer can access it. ~F |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Theo wrote:
Hi all... another new person to the world of file servers. Im looking into using an old computer, beefing it up a bit, and using it for a home office storage unit. Look at my previous post in the thread "I want to build a 1.5TB storage array for MythTV" I used an old K6-III machine to build a 240GB RAID5 array, and it works great. I can (and do) run other programs on it, too. -WD |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Faeandar wrote in
: On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:49:11 -0000, Theo wrote: Hi all... another new person to the world of file servers. Im looking into using an old computer, beefing it up a bit, and using it for a home office storage unit. Also, Im looking into the 'home media center' thing where wireless adapters that plug into stereos or tvs stream data off of computers. And just recently I heard of network attached storage. What is the difference between the two? Some of the devices I have looked at for an mp3 device for a stereo require certain software be installed (which I suppose means either a computer or a file server). One will accept NAS. Is the real difference that file serves can run programs and things other than hard drives, and NAS cannot? Thanks Depends on the NAS and file server. Unless you get a NAS appliance a file server usually runs a windows or unix OS, so they too can run applications all while serving files to clients over the network. NAS is just the description and technology used for accessing files over the network. It's not an application itself. If the server that holds the files has an OS that can run apps then ..... If it has a proprietary OS designed to only do file sharing (NetApp or BueArc come to mind) then no, you can't run other apps on it. Heck, almost anything can be a file server and used as a NAS device. All that's required is a network and the ability to give file access to other users/hosts. My home PC acts as NAS since another computer can access it. ~F Ok thanks... it seems to be a matter of semantics, except for the ready- to-go NAS devices I saw on newegg I think. So, an mp3box that would require a small program to be installed and running on the storage machine would not work with these plugandplay ones? Most have this requirement. Also, for a first timer would a pentium 1 pc suffice? There is an old compaq laying around, but the drive is small and it probably doesnt have alot of memory or a network card. If I looked around I could probably pick a newer one cheap someplace... if this would be more advisable. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:30:34 -0000, Theo wrote:
Faeandar wrote in : On Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:49:11 -0000, Theo wrote: Hi all... another new person to the world of file servers. Im looking into using an old computer, beefing it up a bit, and using it for a home office storage unit. Also, Im looking into the 'home media center' thing where wireless adapters that plug into stereos or tvs stream data off of computers. And just recently I heard of network attached storage. What is the difference between the two? Some of the devices I have looked at for an mp3 device for a stereo require certain software be installed (which I suppose means either a computer or a file server). One will accept NAS. Is the real difference that file serves can run programs and things other than hard drives, and NAS cannot? Thanks Depends on the NAS and file server. Unless you get a NAS appliance a file server usually runs a windows or unix OS, so they too can run applications all while serving files to clients over the network. NAS is just the description and technology used for accessing files over the network. It's not an application itself. If the server that holds the files has an OS that can run apps then ..... If it has a proprietary OS designed to only do file sharing (NetApp or BueArc come to mind) then no, you can't run other apps on it. Heck, almost anything can be a file server and used as a NAS device. All that's required is a network and the ability to give file access to other users/hosts. My home PC acts as NAS since another computer can access it. ~F Ok thanks... it seems to be a matter of semantics, except for the ready- to-go NAS devices I saw on newegg I think. So, an mp3box that would require a small program to be installed and running on the storage machine would not work with these plugandplay ones? Most have this requirement. Also, for a first timer would a pentium 1 pc suffice? There is an old compaq laying around, but the drive is small and it probably doesnt have alot of memory or a network card. If I looked around I could probably pick a newer one cheap someplace... if this would be more advisable. Far more adviseable to get a new one if possible. For US$300 you can get a pretty decent machine by any standard, 250 will get you a fully funtional, NAS ready machine. If mp3's is your file share goal then just load up your windows OS, put the mp3's on it, and share the directory. After that any machine on your network will be able to access it by simply typing \\servername\directoryname. This is the mystery and magic that is NAS.... ~F |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I too build my own rack mountable 1U NAS storage unit for my
department. It costs less than $570 with 2 mirrored 160GB IDE Harddisks. I use an Open-E NAS 2.0 Flash IDE Module. (It is a self-boot NAS O.S. installed in a solid-state IDE module). A low-cost 1U rack server made by ColoMachine. It works great at ½ of the price of a comparable commercial NAS unit. Embedded NAS O.S.: http://www.open-e.com 1U Colomachine : http://www.colomachine.com Will Dormann wrote in message ... Theo wrote: Hi all... another new person to the world of file servers. Im looking into using an old computer, beefing it up a bit, and using it for a home office storage unit. Look at my previous post in the thread "I want to build a 1.5TB storage array for MythTV" I used an old K6-III machine to build a 240GB RAID5 array, and it works great. I can (and do) run other programs on it, too. -WD |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Jesper Monsted wrote in
4.163: Open-E NAS is quite expensive for a home unit like he's apparently trying to build. A freebsd, linux or windows server with samba or windows file sharing will do fine for most, if not all, entry level systems. Thats what its looking like, thanks. One thing I was hoping to avoid was having another big box to have to find a place for. Has anyone tried those adapters that have enthernet plug in one end (for the network) and USB drives on the other for the storage? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
Theo wrote: Thats what its looking like, thanks. One thing I was hoping to avoid was having another big box to have to find a place for. Has anyone tried those adapters that have enthernet plug in one end (for the network) and USB drives on the other for the storage? There was a long discussion on slashdot.org last week about one of them that turned out to be a Linux box. The discussion was mainly on the "hackability" of the box, but I was thinking that it sounded like a pretty useful little gadget... and you can be sure that the people beating on the box will be the first to shake loose any problems. An unconventional way to do your research, perhaps, but probably worth looking into. http://www.tomsnetworking.com/Sections-article85.php http://www.tomsnetworking.com/Sections-article86.php http://www.batbox.org/nslu2-linux.html -- I've seen things you people can't imagine. Chimneysweeps on fire over the roofs of London. I've watched kite-strings glitter in the sun at Hyde Park Gate. All these things will be lost in time, like chalk-paintings in the rain. `-_-' Time for your nap. | Peter da Silva | Har du kramat din varg, idag? 'U` |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On 23 Aug 2004 13:41:00 GMT, Jesper Monsted
wrote: (RCman) wrote in . com: I too build my own rack mountable 1U NAS storage unit for my department. It costs less than $570 with 2 mirrored 160GB IDE Harddisks. I use an Open-E NAS 2.0 Flash IDE Module. (It is a self-boot NAS O.S. installed in a solid-state IDE module). A low-cost 1U rack server made by ColoMachine. It works great at ½ of the price of a comparable commercial NAS unit. Open-E NAS is quite expensive for a home unit like he's apparently trying to build. A freebsd, linux or windows server with samba or windows file sharing will do fine for most, if not all, entry level systems. Might want to check out http://www.openfiler.org/ ~F |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mustek 1200 III EP undetectable in any image program | Raymond A. Chamberlin | Scanners | 18 | January 10th 05 08:52 AM |
Nero help needed | foghat | Cdr | 0 | May 31st 04 08:23 PM |
problem with CUE file | Duncan Newell | Cdr | 3 | May 16th 04 10:03 PM |
Nero and dvd-r failure | Blair Wilson | Cdr | 1 | February 5th 04 07:23 AM |
Help! - The dreaded buffer underrun | XPG | Cdr | 5 | August 31st 03 06:27 PM |