A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Running a Server



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 29th 03, 09:27 PM
Omar Bohsali
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Running a Server

Hello.

I run some small websites and am thinking of getting an old 300 mhz
computer and running it as a server at home.

I have an adsl connection. From what I understand, the upstream is nothing
great, but for my uses, I believe that this would be fine. I also consider
running redhat linux as the operating system (shrike set for server).

What would you say to this configuration? Would a 300 mhz pc with 64mb
or ram be good enough for some websites (http://www.mcleancrew.org,
http://www.omarbohsali.com) and several others? These are low traffic, and
so is my budget. What do you think?

Thanks,

Omar




  #2  
Old October 29th 03, 10:24 PM
kony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:27:05 GMT, "Omar Bohsali"
wrote:

Hello.

I run some small websites and am thinking of getting an old 300 mhz
computer and running it as a server at home.

I have an adsl connection. From what I understand, the upstream is nothing
great, but for my uses, I believe that this would be fine. I also consider
running redhat linux as the operating system (shrike set for server).

What would you say to this configuration? Would a 300 mhz pc with 64mb
or ram be good enough for some websites (http://www.mcleancrew.org,
http://www.omarbohsali.com) and several others? These are low traffic, and
so is my budget. What do you think?

Thanks,

Omar


Yes, a 300MHz-based system is plenty fast enough for an ADSL
webserver. Primarily you'll want something with busmastering PCI,
UDMA IDE controller instead of PIO-mode. In other words, Pentium 2 or
Super Socket 7 or newer would be preferred, but a Pentium 166 on a TX
or HX motherboard would probably be enough too, since the ADSL
upstream bandwidth is going to be the bottleneck.

If the total size of frequently-served files + OS is 64MB, you
ought to consider adding more memory, i'd go with at least 128MB if
it's handy, though 64MB WOULD work, or even less, just a matter of
how often you want the HDD accessed.


Dave
  #3  
Old October 29th 03, 11:25 PM
Omar Bohsali
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"kony" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:27:05 GMT, "Omar Bohsali"
wrote:

Hello.

I run some small websites and am thinking of getting an old 300 mhz
computer and running it as a server at home.

I have an adsl connection. From what I understand, the upstream is

nothing
great, but for my uses, I believe that this would be fine. I also

consider
running redhat linux as the operating system (shrike set for server).

What would you say to this configuration? Would a 300 mhz pc with

64mb
or ram be good enough for some websites (http://www.mcleancrew.org,
http://www.omarbohsali.com) and several others? These are low traffic,

and
so is my budget. What do you think?

Thanks,

Omar


Yes, a 300MHz-based system is plenty fast enough for an ADSL
webserver. Primarily you'll want something with busmastering PCI,
UDMA IDE controller instead of PIO-mode. In other words, Pentium 2 or
Super Socket 7 or newer would be preferred, but a Pentium 166 on a TX
or HX motherboard would probably be enough too, since the ADSL
upstream bandwidth is going to be the bottleneck.

If the total size of frequently-served files + OS is 64MB, you
ought to consider adding more memory, i'd go with at least 128MB if
it's handy, though 64MB WOULD work, or even less, just a matter of
how often you want the HDD accessed.


Dave


awesome. do you have any recommendations for the Operating System? I was
thinking of Redhat Linux 9, as I mentioned previously. Do you think it would
run well?


  #4  
Old October 30th 03, 01:58 AM
kony
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 23:25:11 GMT, "Omar Bohsali"
wrote:


"kony" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:27:05 GMT, "Omar Bohsali"
wrote:

Hello.

I run some small websites and am thinking of getting an old 300 mhz
computer and running it as a server at home.

I have an adsl connection. From what I understand, the upstream is

nothing
great, but for my uses, I believe that this would be fine. I also

consider
running redhat linux as the operating system (shrike set for server).

What would you say to this configuration? Would a 300 mhz pc with

64mb
or ram be good enough for some websites (http://www.mcleancrew.org,
http://www.omarbohsali.com) and several others? These are low traffic,

and
so is my budget. What do you think?

Thanks,

Omar


Yes, a 300MHz-based system is plenty fast enough for an ADSL
webserver. Primarily you'll want something with busmastering PCI,
UDMA IDE controller instead of PIO-mode. In other words, Pentium 2 or
Super Socket 7 or newer would be preferred, but a Pentium 166 on a TX
or HX motherboard would probably be enough too, since the ADSL
upstream bandwidth is going to be the bottleneck.

If the total size of frequently-served files + OS is 64MB, you
ought to consider adding more memory, i'd go with at least 128MB if
it's handy, though 64MB WOULD work, or even less, just a matter of
how often you want the HDD accessed.


Dave


awesome. do you have any recommendations for the Operating System? I was
thinking of Redhat Linux 9, as I mentioned previously. Do you think it would
run well?


Once it's up and running the only thing it'll be doing is serving,
right? Any OS will run fine doing this simple webpage serving, the
overheat on most OS is when users are multitasking and running a lot
in the background. There are tutorials on the 'net, you ought to do
a Google search for some to get an idea what you need, as it's a lot
easier for you to analyze each option, knowing what your specific
needs are. If you want Redhat 9 that should work fine, though for a
limited-memory system you might find something pre-made, with a
smaller memory footprint, but I don't know what's out there, the best
for a system with lesser memory.


Dave
  #5  
Old October 30th 03, 11:51 AM
Peter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Omar Bohsali" wrote in message ...
"kony" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:27:05 GMT, "Omar Bohsali"
wrote:

Hello.

I run some small websites and am thinking of getting an old 300 mhz
computer and running it as a server at home.

I have an adsl connection. From what I understand, the upstream is

nothing
great, but for my uses, I believe that this would be fine. I also

consider
running redhat linux as the operating system (shrike set for server).

What would you say to this configuration? Would a 300 mhz pc with

64mb
or ram be good enough for some websites (http://www.mcleancrew.org,
http://www.omarbohsali.com) and several others? These are low traffic,

and
so is my budget. What do you think?

Thanks,

Omar


Yes, a 300MHz-based system is plenty fast enough for an ADSL
webserver. Primarily you'll want something with busmastering PCI,
UDMA IDE controller instead of PIO-mode. In other words, Pentium 2 or
Super Socket 7 or newer would be preferred, but a Pentium 166 on a TX
or HX motherboard would probably be enough too, since the ADSL
upstream bandwidth is going to be the bottleneck.

If the total size of frequently-served files + OS is 64MB, you
ought to consider adding more memory, i'd go with at least 128MB if
it's handy, though 64MB WOULD work, or even less, just a matter of
how often you want the HDD accessed.


Dave


awesome. do you have any recommendations for the Operating System? I was
thinking of Redhat Linux 9, as I mentioned previously. Do you think it would
run well?


I would recommend Redhat 6.2 because it's fast and stable. I've got
it on a P2 350MHz machine with 192Mb. I'm running it without a GUI
which saves memory and CPU usage quite a bit. If you use redhat 9
then the GUI would probably be too much for your machine. RH 6.2 does
come with a GUI but I choose not to use it, it makes configuration
harder but gives great performance. I only installed RH6.2 yesterday
but I hope to make it into a server. Hopefully it will run a telnet
server, Soldier of Fortune 2 server, Counter strike server, an ftp
server and maybe a Web server.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Running a server Rodders General 1 October 19th 03 10:51 PM
Firewall/router suggestions? Phrederik General 3 September 28th 03 04:00 AM
Upgrades to workstation to use as a server changed General 0 September 23rd 03 08:38 PM
Server Hardware? Computee General 1 August 1st 03 02:56 PM
Windows server video capture hardware/software Some One General 0 July 27th 03 05:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.