If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Best way to increase frame rate to suit less powered platforms?
My platform is:
CPU: XP 1800+ CHIPSET: KT266A RAM: 512 MB My video card is: GF 4 Ti 4600 128 MB Ram Obviously, the video card outperforms the platform easily. My question is; when selecting video options in games, what are the things that depend on CPU, as opposed to video card that should be modified so as to produce the best frame rate? For instance, I know the resolution itself depends more on the card than the platform and that reducing it may not produce any improvements. I would expect the same for texture detail levels and anti-aliasing (although anti-aliasing will be card dependent and will generally have an effect). But do things like shadows and smoke matter? What other sorts of things should I look for so as to best match my video card and platform to produce best quality while retaining highest frame rates? In nominate |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Power supply can zap motherboard? | Eric Popelka | Homebuilt PC's | 8 | June 18th 05 08:54 PM |
Running a M7NCD Motherboard with 400 FSB | Krutibas Biswal | Overclocking AMD Processors | 17 | October 4th 04 11:36 AM |
can't set frame rate in CoD anymore | Wenslauw | Ati Videocards | 1 | February 24th 04 02:32 PM |
Happy Birthday America | SST | Overclocking | 333 | November 27th 03 07:54 PM |
will a cheap PSU (antec) kill P4S800 ? | nerdb0t | Asus Motherboards | 7 | October 23rd 03 11:37 PM |