A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » AMD x86-64 Processors
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dual Core Comparison



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old May 16th 06, 07:25 PM posted to alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.amd.x86-64
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dual Core Comparison

On Tue, 16 May 2006 09:42:22 -0700, Ed Light wrote:


"General Schvantzkoph" wrote in message
news
On Tue, 16 May 2006 00:23:19 -0700, kukkanen wrote:

SO, with 100 drives the propability is 100%? It just don't work that
way, sorry.


The discussion is about MTBFs. If a single drive has an MTBF or 10000
hours and you have 100 drives in the system then the MTBF of the system
would be 100 hours. That doesn't mean that the system will fail once
every 100 hours like clock work. It just means that on average you would
see a drive failure every 100 hours.


That's a pretty amazing statistic, but after the 2 or 3 duds died the
other ones would last for awhile before they started to.

I'm just using 10000 hours as a nice round number to explain the math. I
don't know what the actual MTBF number for any particular drive is but I'm
pretty sure it's better than that.

  #52  
Old May 21st 06, 10:40 PM posted to alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,alt.comp.hardware.amd.x86-64
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Dual Core Comparison

That is very fascinating, but the probability still doesn't add up to
100% does it?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AMD Dual core is better than Intels... Jay B Dell Computers 1 December 5th 05 04:31 PM
AMD or Intel : Dual core Brian Intel 9 July 29th 05 05:19 PM
for those wondering about dual core bios dead kitty AMD x86-64 Processors 3 July 27th 05 06:11 PM
Dual Core Chips vs Dual Processors nikoli General 2 May 26th 05 12:04 PM
"Pentium 4" brandname ready to be dropped Yousuf Khan Intel 69 November 5th 04 12:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.