If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Dual Core Comparison
On Tue, 16 May 2006 09:42:22 -0700, Ed Light wrote:
"General Schvantzkoph" wrote in message news On Tue, 16 May 2006 00:23:19 -0700, kukkanen wrote: SO, with 100 drives the propability is 100%? It just don't work that way, sorry. The discussion is about MTBFs. If a single drive has an MTBF or 10000 hours and you have 100 drives in the system then the MTBF of the system would be 100 hours. That doesn't mean that the system will fail once every 100 hours like clock work. It just means that on average you would see a drive failure every 100 hours. That's a pretty amazing statistic, but after the 2 or 3 duds died the other ones would last for awhile before they started to. I'm just using 10000 hours as a nice round number to explain the math. I don't know what the actual MTBF number for any particular drive is but I'm pretty sure it's better than that. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Dual Core Comparison
That is very fascinating, but the probability still doesn't add up to
100% does it? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AMD Dual core is better than Intels... | Jay B | Dell Computers | 1 | December 5th 05 04:31 PM |
AMD or Intel : Dual core | Brian | Intel | 9 | July 29th 05 05:19 PM |
for those wondering about dual core bios | dead kitty | AMD x86-64 Processors | 3 | July 27th 05 06:11 PM |
Dual Core Chips vs Dual Processors | nikoli | General | 2 | May 26th 05 12:04 PM |
"Pentium 4" brandname ready to be dropped | Yousuf Khan | Intel | 69 | November 5th 04 12:51 AM |