If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
64 bit OS?
Do they have the 64 bit OS out yet?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:52:10 -0700, Richard Miller wrote:
Do they have the 64 bit OS out yet? Windows have it allmost for half a year, or "they" are somebody else ? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:52:10 -0700, Richard Miller wrote:
Do they have the 64 bit OS out yet? 64 bit Linux has be out of several years. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Richard Miller" wrote in message news:e8c_e.164807$Ji4.35807@fed1read03... Do they have the 64 bit OS out yet? It has been out for several months. Windows XP Professional x64 Edition. Bobby |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"General Schvantzkoph" wrote in message news On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:52:10 -0700, Richard Miller wrote: Do they have the 64 bit OS out yet? 64 bit Linux has be out of several years. Typical Linux user...can't spell, does not know how to use a spell checker... Bobby |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"NoNoBadDog!" writes:
"General Schvantzkoph" wrote in message news On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:52:10 -0700, Richard Miller wrote: Do they have the 64 bit OS out yet? 64 bit Linux has be out of several years. Typical Linux user...can't spell, does not know how to use a spell checker... Bobby Was the gratuitous insult really necessary? You are also presupposing that the tool with which the General posted his comment has a built-in spelling checker (mine doesn't). scott |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 01:04:12 +0000, Scott Lurndal wrote:
"NoNoBadDog!" writes: "General Schvantzkoph" wrote in message news On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:52:10 -0700, Richard Miller wrote: Do they have the 64 bit OS out yet? 64 bit Linux has be out of several years. Typical Linux user...can't spell, does not know how to use a spell checker... Bobby Was the gratuitous insult really necessary? You are also presupposing that the tool with which the General posted his comment has a built-in spelling checker (mine doesn't). scott Scott thanks for standing up for me but it's really not necessary, the best response to flamers is no response at all. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Scott Lurndal" wrote in message . .. "NoNoBadDog!" writes: "General Schvantzkoph" wrote in message news On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:52:10 -0700, Richard Miller wrote: Do they have the 64 bit OS out yet? 64 bit Linux has be out of several years. Typical Linux user...can't spell, does not know how to use a spell checker... Bobby Was the gratuitous insult really necessary? You are also presupposing that the tool with which the General posted his comment has a built-in spelling checker (mine doesn't). scott //////....has be out of several years....////// Most of the posters extolling the perfection of Linux tend to be 13 year old closet monkeys...and when I read something like the above, that is immediately the image that comes to mind. I have nothing against anyone who uses Linux, or any variant thereof. I just hate the idiots that try to paint it as the be all and end all of OSes. Finally, if anyone is going to butt in with totally irrelevant information, as the "General" did, they should at least make sure the post does not read like it was drafted by a drunken sailor. Bobby |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:02:22 +0000, NoNoBadDog! wrote:
"Scott Lurndal" wrote in message . .. "NoNoBadDog!" writes: "General Schvantzkoph" wrote in message news On Tue, 27 Sep 2005 06:52:10 -0700, Richard Miller wrote: Do they have the 64 bit OS out yet? 64 bit Linux has be out of several years. Typical Linux user...can't spell, does not know how to use a spell checker... Bobby Was the gratuitous insult really necessary? You are also presupposing that the tool with which the General posted his comment has a built-in spelling checker (mine doesn't). scott //////....has be out of several years....////// Most of the posters extolling the perfection of Linux tend to be 13 year old closet monkeys...and when I read something like the above, that is immediately the image that comes to mind. No matter how bad his spelling was, at least the content as correct. That's a lot more than I can say for your stupid statement. I have nothing against anyone who uses Linux, or any variant thereof. I just hate the idiots that try to paint it as the be all and end all of OSes. And telling someone it exist in 64bit does that? I think you're just a little paranoid. Finally, if anyone is going to butt in with totally irrelevant information, as the "General" did, they should at least make sure the post does not read like it was drafted by a drunken sailor. And why was it irrelevant. The original question simply asked if there was a 64 bit OS out yet. It did not specify from any manufacturer. His answer (minus form) was perfectly correct. Personally I think you're the 13 year old in the closet. Or at least that's how you acted with your response. Bobby Booby would be more like it. -- KT133 MB, CPU @2400MHz (24x100): SIS755 MB CPU @2330MHz (10x233) Need good help? Provide all system info with question. My server http://wesnewell.no-ip.com/cpu.php Verizon server http://mysite.verizon.net/res0exft/cpu.htm |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|