![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Jim!
04 Nov 13 16:11, Jim Beard wrote to All: The change from single-processor to dual-processor is typically dramatic. A change from dual-processor to quad-processor is usually barely noticeable unless the machine is a server under heavy load and you have the monitoring tools to actually recognize the effects of tinkering with settings. The change from quad-core to 8-core will be trivial in most circumstances. If you have massive amounts of massively-cpu-intensive processing to do, and rewrite your applications for optimized cpu-sharing, the results can be rewarding. I must admit I have not done any CPU intensive work but I did run some backups/restores from the original 3Tb HDD (E6600 system) to the AMD system with a 1Tb HDD. Two running at the same time and the load went up to 5.0+. Looking at both top and htop which seems to give differing output regarding each core at best only cores 1 & 3 had any real load but well below 50% and cores 2 & 4 had slight load. I could not see what each core was doing (Is there a tool for that?). It would be a useful function to run a bash script against a specific core or get the kernel to distribute the load across the cores but again I cannot see how one does that BUT the kernel should be doing all this without user input (as it were). I will be running thw Windows 7 inbuilt benchmark against both boxes to see what the numbers are however, I suspect that these tests have a bias in one direction or another and not just core loadings and throughput etc. Regardless even if the Windows test shows a strong difference between the two it does not indicate what is happeing (or not) under Linux. There has to be suitable tools for dealing with these issues under Linux without me having to run a JCL tool (al la IBM) on the boxes. Says, Vince wishfully. Vince |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 17:49:25 +0000, Vince Coen wrote:
There has to be suitable tools for dealing with these issues under Linux without me having to run a JCL tool (al la IBM) on the boxes. Gkrellum will give you real times loads on all cores plus other system info. There are cpu frequency panel applets to show the frequency of each core in real time. If you just want snapshot data, there are many CL options for that. cat /proc/cpuinfo will give you info on all cores. cpufreq-aperf cpufreq-info cpufreq-selector cpufreq-set are CL tools for users for various actions. To find all commnds available to you type each letter ay CL and then hit the Tab key. Root will have more than user. [[email protected] ~]$ c Display all 159 possibilities? (y or n) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sabertooth and a AMD 8350 speed issues | Vince Coen[_2_] | AMD x86-64 Processors | 0 | November 4th 13 05:48 PM |
AMD FX-8350 Heat Sink Question? | Don[_22_] | Homebuilt PC's | 4 | November 11th 12 08:08 PM |
800LCi - 802.11b speed issues | Joel | Acer Computers | 3 | July 9th 04 03:30 PM |
Need for Speed Underground issues? | Don Burnette | Ati Videocards | 8 | December 22nd 03 06:09 AM |
Need For Speed Underground issues | matthew utt | Ati Videocards | 8 | December 8th 03 01:44 AM |