A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » Processors » Overclocking AMD Processors
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Temp Difference on-die and under-cpu sensors



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 19th 04, 04:26 AM
Ed Light
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Temp Difference on-die and under-cpu sensors

I've just got an A7V880 and the cpu temp is read from under the socket.
There's no little tape reaching up. My Biostar read the sensor in the cpu.

How much cooler should the under-cpu sensor read than the on-die sensor?

I'm having voltage reading issues, so don't trust the temp reading, and am
trying to establish some sort of ratio.


--
Ed Light

Smiley :-/
MS Smiley :-\

Send spam to the FTC at

Thanks, robots.


  #2  
Old September 19th 04, 06:02 AM
Augustus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Light" wrote in message
news:v_63d.274119$Lj.134746@fed1read03...
I've just got an A7V880 and the cpu temp is read from under the socket.
There's no little tape reaching up. My Biostar read the sensor in the cpu.

How much cooler should the under-cpu sensor read than the on-die sensor?

I'm having voltage reading issues, so don't trust the temp reading, and am
trying to establish some sort of ratio.


My Soltek board monitors both....on my Barton 2500 @ 2205Mhz at idle it's
39-40C external CPU diode, 45C internal CPU diode. Under heavy load, they're
both up by about 6-7C, and they're still 5-6 degrees apart.


  #3  
Old September 19th 04, 07:39 AM
BigBadger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Ed Light" wrote in message
news:v_63d.274119$Lj.134746@fed1read03...
I've just got an A7V880 and the cpu temp is read from under the socket.
There's no little tape reaching up. My Biostar read the sensor in the cpu.

How much cooler should the under-cpu sensor read than the on-die sensor?

I'm having voltage reading issues, so don't trust the temp reading, and am
trying to establish some sort of ratio.


It's really impossible to say because the reading from the socket diode is
adjusted via a algorithm to approximate on die temperature. If the
adjustment applied is perfect there will be zeo difference between socket
and die temps, however it's rarely perfect.

--
*****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address*****


  #4  
Old September 19th 04, 05:08 PM
Augustus
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's really impossible to say because the reading from the socket diode is
adjusted via a algorithm to approximate on die temperature. If the
adjustment applied is perfect there will be zeo difference between socket
and die temps, however it's rarely perfect.


Do you have any link or other info to back this assertion up. Not the part
about the adjustment algorithm, but the part that it's supposed to
compensate for and approximate internal CPU diode temp. Is it not supposed
to give CPU external surface temp?


  #5  
Old September 19th 04, 05:34 PM
BigBadger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"BigBadger" wrote in message
...
"Ed Light" wrote in message
news:v_63d.274119$Lj.134746@fed1read03...
I've just got an A7V880 and the cpu temp is read from under the socket.
There's no little tape reaching up. My Biostar read the sensor in the
cpu.

How much cooler should the under-cpu sensor read than the on-die sensor?

I'm having voltage reading issues, so don't trust the temp reading, and
am
trying to establish some sort of ratio.


It's really impossible to say because the reading from the socket diode is
adjusted via a algorithm to approximate on die temperature. If the
adjustment applied is perfect there will be zeo difference between socket
and die temps, however it's rarely perfect.


Oops...should have said socket 'Thermister'
*****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address*****


  #6  
Old September 19th 04, 06:45 PM
BigBadger
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Augustus" wrote in message
news:bai3d.25430$yW6.1262@clgrps12...
It's really impossible to say because the reading from the socket diode
is adjusted via a algorithm to approximate on die temperature. If the
adjustment applied is perfect there will be zeo difference between socket
and die temps, however it's rarely perfect.


Do you have any link or other info to back this assertion up. Not the part
about the adjustment algorithm, but the part that it's supposed to
compensate for and approximate internal CPU diode temp. Is it not supposed
to give CPU external surface temp?

Internal CPU diode or CPU core external temp, the two should be pretty
close. It does not really matter which the algorithm tries to emulate. The
point I tried to make, is the socket thermister reading is adjusted,
therefore without knowing the exact nature of the adjustment it's impossible
to say what the relationship between internal diode and socket thermister
temperatures is.
--
*****Replace 'NOSPAM' with 'btinternet' in the reply address*****


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.