If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#371
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 22:45:50 GMT, John Doe
wrote: This troll apparently really does not know the difference between a sleeve bearing and a fluid dynamic bearing. The difference is a marketing department. |
#372
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
On 2006-07-21, kony wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 17:38:15 +0200, Jure Sah wrote: You might want to read up on the fact that 9600 baud on computers is no longer 9600 baud and not only in multitasking systems. It has to do with the point that all modern OS's CPU time scheduling mechanisms are incompetent. It's not like 9600 baud is something the hardware could not manage, it's the point that the software's triggers and events misfire by design. It seems you're suggesting computers don't work at all, since they can and do processes 9600 baud signals as well as a myrid # of others, given I/O peripherals. Correct. Anyone suggesting otherwise lacks experience in these things. Cast your mind back 10-15 years where it was relatively common to hook up a single machine to several dumb terminals for UNIX use. The machines at the time could easily support 30-40+ users on serial lines, often at higher baud rates than 9600. Bear in mind we're talking about 386 or 486 processors with 8450 or possibly 16450 UARTs if you weren't lucky enough to have an intelligent serial card. -- Andrew Smallshaw |
#373
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
"John Doe" wrote in message ... I guess this troll also considers "sleeve bearing" to be a marketing term. i no longer care why every single post you write starts out with, 'this troll' but you just are a nuisance so into the kill file you go. |
#374
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
"Jure Sah" wrote in message news John Doe pravi: I knew this troll was going to have a tough time with my simple correction. What exactly makes me a troll here? If you say anything he doesn't agree with then you get labelled a troll by him. Just killfile him and be done with it. |
#375
|
|||
|
|||
Why Pentium?
Intel had bigger production of processors. In that time they made
contracts with big pc-produce companies. Now You can read abot ome companies offering AMD based computers, because of AMD's FAB36 - they increased production so they can satify the price and quantity demands. There is always posibility to bild you own pc with processor of Your choise. PS Sorry for mispelling. English is not my primar language |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CAD and Pentium 4 vs Pentium M | Matt Roberts | Intel | 2 | June 30th 05 03:33 PM |
Pentium 2 512 MB limitation ? | Peter Perlsų | Intel | 4 | December 24th 03 05:21 AM |
New PC with W2K? | Rob | UK Computer Vendors | 5 | August 29th 03 12:32 PM |
Pentium II CPU upgrading to Pentium III ??? | Hans Huber | General | 14 | July 18th 03 02:11 PM |
Pentium II CPU upgrading to Pentium III ??? | Hans Huber | Homebuilt PC's | 6 | July 13th 03 12:55 PM |