A computer components & hardware forum. HardwareBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » HardwareBanter forum » General Hardware & Peripherals » Storage (alternative)
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Which drive would you get?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old February 15th 19, 05:28 PM posted to comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage
VanguardLH[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,453
Default Which drive would you get?

jerryab wrote:

Filip454 wrote:

This is the biggest myth, which is also constantly repeated on the
internet.

Lower temperature =/= running longer


It is no myth for electronic components. Running hotter = shorter
component life.


Except your hypothesis is one-ended. Running too cold is more deadly
than running too hot. Also, there is a difference between a drive that
is running hot (outside of its operating temperature range) and just
running hotter (which is relative to some base value that is often never
specified).

Google and others have actually done massive studies on hard drive
failure rates under various environmental conditions - versus you and
others promulgating that age-old and unfounded myths based on casual
observation.

https://www.zdnet.com/article/heat-d...res-what-does/
(use the link to the PDF to read the research)

https://www.teamsilverback.com/humid...-drive-killer/

Turns out humidity has a greater effect on hard drive longevity than
does temperature (wherein the restriction that you are running the hard
disk within its rated operating temperature range, not at extremes).
Hard disks are not sealed. The cinter filter only prevents particulate
debris from getting inside, not gases or vapors.

Surge current (electrical stress), thermal stress (temperature delta),
and mechanical stress are more important than running hot or cold (but
again within the rated operating temperature range). USB-attached
drives and even internal ones (depending on power options) can be
stressed more by power cycling them or repeatedly spinning down and
resuming on activity.

Even physical orientation of the disk has more of an effective on
longevity than does runnning at the high end of the operating
temperature range. Manufacturers say there is no difference because
they are specifying within the MTBF rating for their product. Heat
rising off a horizontal platter does not cross over and reheat the
platter as would occur in a vertical orientation. This is the same
consideration when planning air flow within the chassis: do not push
pre-heated air over components that you are trying to cool. Also, in
the past, manufacturers used to recommend the drive was formatted in the
same orientation under which it would be used. In other words, don't
format when horizontal and then use when vertical. Mostly that has been
lost regarding longevity of the drive but there is still a performance
degrade. See:

http://lowendmac.com/2018/does-hard-...t-performance/

The results show "it depends on the make and model of the drive". So,
it's not a hard and fast rule but can occur.

USB-attached and even internal disks using Power Options will spin down
when idle. This means cooling down. It means a power surge on spin up
which means heating up. Higher activity means more energy consumed
which means more heat; however, activity fluctuates for end user hosts
versus file servers where the drive is likely to be constantly active.
Electrical stress (surge), thermal stress, and mechanical stress also
factor into longevity. As the Google study shows, age far outweighs any
temperature factor regarding longevity - with 2 years being the major
factor to change from 2% to 8% AFR (annualized failure rate). That is,
longevity is not linear with age of the drive.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SSD boot drive vs. hard drive with large cache for boot drive? speed difference? Joe[_23_] Dell Computers 6 October 15th 14 01:54 PM
Cloning OS drive to newer, larger drive without hidden Dell Restore Partition xsrossiter Dell Computers 12 August 13th 07 02:24 PM
Cloning OS drive to newer, larger drive without hidden Dell Restore Partition xsrossiter Storage (alternative) 12 August 13th 07 02:24 PM
Hard drive runs at random, but no light and no record of drive/file access Carl. General 1 February 6th 05 06:35 PM
Windows REinstallation failed because of drive failure. Drive's diagnostic is fine! Mathieu Leplatre Storage (alternative) 5 August 19th 04 01:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 HardwareBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.