If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
They come in threes...
Bad things, that is.
After a long spell of being ignored my old home-built Windows Home Server started to show a variety of odd problems. I used WD's diagnostics program to check each of the 6 disks sequentially and finally came to drive #5 which showed stalling and slow progress in the sequential read test. That lead me to digging through a stack of spare drives looking for a replacement. That is when the first death occurred -- I accidentally dropped a 3tB WD Green drive onto its corner on a hardwood floor; it tested OK for a few minutes after the drop (whew!) but died immediately afterward (damn!). Back to the drive stack I dug out a 2tB Green that tested good but by then I was unable to programmatically 'remove' the #5 drive from the storage array and had to sacrifice all of my backups to swap the drive. So I started to do some replacement backups only to find that progress was impossible -- backup rate was so slow that it would take days to process one machine. That lead me to run diagnostics on the sole untested drive in the server -- it was defective too in the extended test. Back to the drive stack to recover another 2tB drive. None there. Order one from Amazon since they had gotten quite cheap lately. And when it arrived I swapped it out after once again finding it impossible to 'remove' the bad drive from the array. At that point I had a healthy server but one which had no backups so I had to start that all over again. I really can't fault WD on the drive failures. The 3tB I dropped certainly wasn't their doing and the two 2tB drives that failed were quite old by this time -- they were bought when that model drive had just been released and had been running 24X7 ever since. I think that from now on I'll maybe run a test on the server drives every now and then and no ignore it for years on end... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
They come in threes...
John McGaw wrote:
Bad things, that is. After a long spell of being ignored my old home-built Windows Home Server started to show a variety of odd problems. I used WD's diagnostics program to check each of the 6 disks sequentially and finally came to drive #5 which showed stalling and slow progress in the sequential read test. That lead me to digging through a stack of spare drives looking for a replacement. That is when the first death occurred -- I accidentally dropped a 3tB WD Green drive onto its corner on a hardwood floor; it tested OK for a few minutes after the drop (whew!) but died immediately afterward (damn!). Back to the drive stack I dug out a 2tB Green that tested good but by then I was unable to programmatically 'remove' the #5 drive from the storage array and had to sacrifice all of my backups to swap the drive. So I started to do some replacement backups only to find that progress was impossible -- backup rate was so slow that it would take days to process one machine. That lead me to run diagnostics on the sole untested drive in the server -- it was defective too in the extended test. Back to the drive stack to recover another 2tB drive. None there. Order one from Amazon since they had gotten quite cheap lately. And when it arrived I swapped it out after once again finding it impossible to 'remove' the bad drive from the array. At that point I had a healthy server but one which had no backups so I had to start that all over again. I really can't fault WD on the drive failures. The 3tB I dropped certainly wasn't their doing and the two 2tB drives that failed were quite old by this time -- they were bought when that model drive had just been released and had been running 24X7 ever since. I think that from now on I'll maybe run a test on the server drives every now and then and no ignore it for years on end... I recommend both "SMART" checking, as well as running a transfer rate benchmark on each drive. (You might need to move the drives to another machine, where they're not considered to be part of a RAID, to do your block-level verification.) I ran into one case, where the slow read benchmark warned that an excessive number of spared sectors were involved. Whereas SMART showed "0" for Reallocated. SMART works best for surveillance, if the spared sectors are spaced uniformly over the disk. If a disk develops a "bad spot", SMART may show a clean bill of health. But a read transfer rate benchmark, might show 10MB transfer rate for a 60GB patch on the disk, which is a warning that the patch is "scruffy". And the drive should be replaced immediately. There may be no CRC errors in the patch, the data is still intact, but trouble for you is right around the corner. And drive failures can be instantaneous - the FDB spindle motor, if it runs out of lubricant, can "seize" instantly, and no longer rotate. Attempts to restart the drive, lead to the "buzzing sound" they use to attempt to free up stuck spindles. But that's not going to work, if the bearing is dry. And apparently, the lubrication is only a couple drops of oil. There is no "reservoir" as such. No oil pan with 3 liters of oil. To verify motor designs in the hard drive lab, they weigh the motors on a milligram balance, to detect when the two drops of oil have "disappeared". They don't try to take the motor apart, and instead use "delta_weight" to detect loss of lubricant. Weigh the motor before starting a lifetime test, and weigh it again when it seizes. That's how tiny the amount of lubricant is. Paul |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
They come in threes...
On 12/4/2015 1:19 PM, Paul wrote:
John McGaw wrote: Bad things, that is. snip... I recommend both "SMART" checking, as well as running a transfer rate benchmark on each drive. (You might need to move the drives to another machine, where they're not considered to be part of a RAID, to do your block-level verification.) I ran into one case, where the slow read benchmark warned that an excessive number of spared sectors were involved. Whereas SMART showed "0" for Reallocated. SMART works best for surveillance, if the spared sectors are spaced uniformly over the disk. If a disk develops a "bad spot", SMART may show a clean bill of health. But a read transfer rate benchmark, might show 10MB transfer rate for a 60GB patch on the disk, which is a warning that the patch is "scruffy". And the drive should be replaced immediately. There may be no CRC errors in the patch, the data is still intact, but trouble for you is right around the corner. And drive failures can be instantaneous - the FDB spindle motor, if it runs out of lubricant, can "seize" instantly, and no longer rotate. Attempts to restart the drive, lead to the "buzzing sound" they use to attempt to free up stuck spindles. But that's not going to work, if the bearing is dry. And apparently, the lubrication is only a couple drops of oil. There is no "reservoir" as such. No oil pan with 3 liters of oil. To verify motor designs in the hard drive lab, they weigh the motors on a milligram balance, to detect when the two drops of oil have "disappeared". They don't try to take the motor apart, and instead use "delta_weight" to detect loss of lubricant. Weigh the motor before starting a lifetime test, and weigh it again when it seizes. That's how tiny the amount of lubricant is. Paul The SMART results were totally useless in this case -- all six of the drives, a 400gB and five 2tBs, showed that they were fine. At least that is what the WD diagnostics showed in the SMART quick-test mode. It wasn't until I did a long-form test that the stalling showed up. You know that you are having trouble when the displayed estimated duration starts jumping up instead of down and settles in the range of 2000 hours. I'm certain that the motors didn't fail here although I guess it could have been a speed problem of sort causing the stalling. Even the dropped 3tB drive was certainly spinning up since when I checked it on the eSATA port on my Shuttle it showed perfect gyroscopic behavior. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
They come in threes... Following up...
On 12/4/2015 12:05 PM, John McGaw wrote:
Bad things, that is. snip... I really can't fault WD on the drive failures. The 3tB I dropped certainly wasn't their doing and the two 2tB drives that failed were quite old by this time -- they were bought when that model drive had just been released and had been running 24X7 ever since. I think that from now on I'll maybe run a test on the server drives every now and then and no ignore it for years on end... On the road to destroying the drives for security I took the time to do complete disassembly after I realized that I hadn't actually looked into any modern drives.(and I wanted the magnets to play with) It was quite a revelation: first off was the realization that one of the 2tB was an older generation than I had imagined since it actually had four platters in it while the slightly newer ones have only three. The 3tB also had four platters and I believe that the full capacity of their newest drives is around 1.25tB per platter or maybe more as I write. Second was the amazing shrinkage of the heads; they are now down to a size that looks like a bit of very fine wire sticking out of the ends of the drive arms. The fact that heads so small can actually do anything and do it so quickly and accurately is incredible to me. Oh, and I have eight really really powerful magnets now although I haven't figured out how to remove them from their metal mounting plates. Any ideas? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
They come in threes... Following up...
John McGaw wrote:
On 12/4/2015 12:05 PM, John McGaw wrote: Bad things, that is. snip... I really can't fault WD on the drive failures. The 3tB I dropped certainly wasn't their doing and the two 2tB drives that failed were quite old by this time -- they were bought when that model drive had just been released and had been running 24X7 ever since. I think that from now on I'll maybe run a test on the server drives every now and then and no ignore it for years on end... On the road to destroying the drives for security I took the time to do complete disassembly after I realized that I hadn't actually looked into any modern drives.(and I wanted the magnets to play with) It was quite a revelation: first off was the realization that one of the 2tB was an older generation than I had imagined since it actually had four platters in it while the slightly newer ones have only three. The 3tB also had four platters and I believe that the full capacity of their newest drives is around 1.25tB per platter or maybe more as I write. Second was the amazing shrinkage of the heads; they are now down to a size that looks like a bit of very fine wire sticking out of the ends of the drive arms. The fact that heads so small can actually do anything and do it so quickly and accurately is incredible to me. Oh, and I have eight really really powerful magnets now although I haven't figured out how to remove them from their metal mounting plates. Any ideas? In the two pictures here, it almost looks like some substance was placed on the plate, to hold the magnet in a known position. http://totallyunprepared.com/2013/03...stud-finder-2/ "The magnets in the hard drive were glued to the brackets. Although the magnets look like they are made of steel, they are actually somewhat delicate. We pulled them off using ViceGrip pliers because that was the safe-for-people way to get them off. It risked damaging the magnet; however trying to slip a screwdriver under the magnet to pry it off is the you-are-probably-going-to-slip-and-hurt-yourself way, so, um, don’t do that." AFAIK, the magnets are positioned in an "attracting each other" orientation. N ---------- S S ---------- N So a means is needed to keep them from slamming together and pinching the voice coil. Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
They come in threes... Following up...
On 12/11/2015 2:32 PM, Paul wrote:
John McGaw wrote: On 12/4/2015 12:05 PM, John McGaw wrote: Bad things, that is. snip... I really can't fault WD on the drive failures. The 3tB I dropped certainly wasn't their doing and the two 2tB drives that failed were quite old by this time -- they were bought when that model drive had just been released and had been running 24X7 ever since. I think that from now on I'll maybe run a test on the server drives every now and then and no ignore it for years on end... On the road to destroying the drives for security I took the time to do complete disassembly after I realized that I hadn't actually looked into any modern drives.(and I wanted the magnets to play with) It was quite a revelation: first off was the realization that one of the 2tB was an older generation than I had imagined since it actually had four platters in it while the slightly newer ones have only three. The 3tB also had four platters and I believe that the full capacity of their newest drives is around 1.25tB per platter or maybe more as I write. Second was the amazing shrinkage of the heads; they are now down to a size that looks like a bit of very fine wire sticking out of the ends of the drive arms. The fact that heads so small can actually do anything and do it so quickly and accurately is incredible to me. Oh, and I have eight really really powerful magnets now although I haven't figured out how to remove them from their metal mounting plates. Any ideas? In the two pictures here, it almost looks like some substance was placed on the plate, to hold the magnet in a known position. http://totallyunprepared.com/2013/03...stud-finder-2/ "The magnets in the hard drive were glued to the brackets. Although the magnets look like they are made of steel, they are actually somewhat delicate. We pulled them off using ViceGrip pliers because that was the safe-for-people way to get them off. It risked damaging the magnet; however trying to slip a screwdriver under the magnet to pry it off is the you-are-probably-going-to-slip-and-hurt-yourself way, so, um, don’t do that." AFAIK, the magnets are positioned in an "attracting each other" orientation. N ---------- S S ---------- N So a means is needed to keep them from slamming together and pinching the voice coil. Paul I think that I'm going to get out my 1" carpentry (as opposed to woodworking) chisel and try to separate a magnet that way. If there is glue (and I'm pretty sure that there must be) a bit of inclined-plane action might have a chance of getting it off intact. I've got eight to play with so there isn't much to lose. These magnets see to be way more powerful than those I salvaged in the old days and I was toying with the idea of "the world's strongest refrigerator magnet" using two of the magnets in a sculpted exotic wood block and capable of holding up a ream of paper. Well, maybe not a ream but perhaps a cm? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Following up, chisel works
On 12/11/2015 3:04 PM, John McGaw wrote:
On 12/11/2015 2:32 PM, Paul wrote: John McGaw wrote: On 12/4/2015 12:05 PM, John McGaw wrote: Bad things, that is. snip... I really can't fault WD on the drive failures. The 3tB I dropped certainly wasn't their doing and the two 2tB drives that failed were quite old by this time -- they were bought when that model drive had just been released and had been running 24X7 ever since. I think that from now on I'll maybe run a test on the server drives every now and then and no ignore it for years on end... On the road to destroying the drives for security I took the time to do complete disassembly after I realized that I hadn't actually looked into any modern drives.(and I wanted the magnets to play with) It was quite a revelation: first off was the realization that one of the 2tB was an older generation than I had imagined since it actually had four platters in it while the slightly newer ones have only three. The 3tB also had four platters and I believe that the full capacity of their newest drives is around 1.25tB per platter or maybe more as I write. Second was the amazing shrinkage of the heads; they are now down to a size that looks like a bit of very fine wire sticking out of the ends of the drive arms. The fact that heads so small can actually do anything and do it so quickly and accurately is incredible to me. Oh, and I have eight really really powerful magnets now although I haven't figured out how to remove them from their metal mounting plates. Any ideas? In the two pictures here, it almost looks like some substance was placed on the plate, to hold the magnet in a known position. http://totallyunprepared.com/2013/03...stud-finder-2/ "The magnets in the hard drive were glued to the brackets. Although the magnets look like they are made of steel, they are actually somewhat delicate. We pulled them off using ViceGrip pliers because that was the safe-for-people way to get them off. It risked damaging the magnet; however trying to slip a screwdriver under the magnet to pry it off is the you-are-probably-going-to-slip-and-hurt-yourself way, so, um, don’t do that." AFAIK, the magnets are positioned in an "attracting each other" orientation. N ---------- S S ---------- N So a means is needed to keep them from slamming together and pinching the voice coil. Paul I think that I'm going to get out my 1" carpentry (as opposed to woodworking) chisel and try to separate a magnet that way. If there is glue (and I'm pretty sure that there must be) a bit of inclined-plane action might have a chance of getting it off intact. I've got eight to play with so there isn't much to lose. These magnets see to be way more powerful than those I salvaged in the old days and I was toying with the idea of "the world's strongest refrigerator magnet" using two of the magnets in a sculpted exotic wood block and capable of holding up a ream of paper. Well, maybe not a ream but perhaps a cm? I verified that a sharp chisel works a treat in removing the magnets from their plates but the adhesive that was used is so tenacious that it pulls the shiny plating from the back of the magnet and leaves it on the plate. This is probably not good for the long-term life of the magnets but I'll continue with it since I don't have any clue about a better way. The magnets are damned strong and when they stick to the chisel they are impossible to pull off and must be slid off the edge. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|