If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
My Current Upgrade Plan
I'm building a WishList at Newegg for my upcoming upgrade. Here's the list
currently: - MSI Neo2 - FIS2R - P4 2.4CGHz 800 MHz FSB - 2 x CORSAIR XMS 512MB 64MX64 PC-3200C2PT (1 GB total) - 2 x 160GB Western Digital 7200rpm 8MB cache drives (I've actually had one for about 6 months, so I'm buying another to match it for RAID 0) I'm still researching to see if I need to upgrade my stock cooling to something heftier. Any suggestions? FYI, I like a quiet system (I'll be using an Enermax PSU). I don't see lots of posts of people using the MSI Neo2 board; is there any reason? I've read nothing but good things about it. I found out about it at THG, of course, but I followed up by finding several other reviews, all very favorable. The P4P800Deluxe seems to be a very popular board here. Is there any particular reason people like it over the Neo2-FIS2R? I'm still waffling on my committment to the 2.4 processor as well. Will a 2.6 or 2.8 actually allow me greater overclocking speeds, or are the rumors about all the new P4s reaching the same o/c'd speeds true? Should I get memory for higher fsb speeds? Is Corsair my best bet? Will the performance gains from o/c'ing offset the performance loss from using higher latency sticks? I'm dropping a lot of cash on this, and I AM on a budjet, but this is my first major upgrade in five years. My current system has seen me thru because I tried to take care to choose quality components (BH6 w/300a, more recently w/1100). I'm in this for the long haul. The MSI board seems not to have skimped on features and is fully loaded, even including CSA Gigabit LAN. Are there unpublicized issues of which I should be aware? I'm willing to spend a few more bucks if it means my system will have an extra year or two of useful life before obselescence overtakes it, or if it will ensure greater stability. Thoughts? Opinions? Thanks to all in advance. BJ "His eyes were empty, like two pools of water that were also empty." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
1. The MSI Neo2 gets good reviews and has pretty much the same features as
the ASUS P4P, but it does cost a little more. If you're on a budget why spend the extra? The ASUS P4P is pretty widely accepted as an excellent choice and there's a far larger base of users. On the other hand for the extra $9, you probably wouldn't go wrong with the MSI. 2. If you go with a 2.4 Ghz processor and want to overclock to maximum potential, memory is most likely what will hold you back. With PC3200, you'll be exceeding memory spec with any overclock if you want to run memory in sync, which you should. A decent overclock would be about 3.2 Ghz, which would require any currently available memory to run less than 1:1. The hottest setup would probably be the 2.8 Ghz processor and PC4000 memory running 1:1. The cheapest would be the 2.4 Ghz with PC3500 running something like 4:5. 3. Why do you need 1Gb of memory? Unless you do stuff like intense video editing, more than 512Mb in two sticks isn't going to do you much good. 4. Before you drop a lot of cash for another HD and RAID-0 go he http://www.storagereview.com/index.html Do some homework on the subject, and you may change your mind. RAID-0 is for data you don't mind losing. You must backup frequently, and the speed improvement is debatable. With just two drives in RAID-0, where are you going to backup? Further, to implement RAID-0 your existing drive will have to be formatted. Do you really want to go through the hassle of moving all your data around? Your best bet for speed and reliability might be to add something like the WD Raptor SATA drive as your boot drive. For most applications, it will give you close to the same improvement you'll get from RAID-0, it's cheaper than the 160 GB drive, you won't have to transfer data from your old drive. Here's my recommendation, with a lot more performance potential for about $12 more (unless you do lots of video editing, then add more memory and consider RAID-0 and another backup drive). ASUS P4P Deluxe P4 2.8 Ghz 800 FSB 2 x 256 Mb OCZ PC4000 WD Raptor SATA drive Hey? What are you going to do for a video card? "Bryan L" wrote in message news:ZRd8b.421694$Ho3.67421@sccrnsc03... I'm building a WishList at Newegg for my upcoming upgrade. Here's the list currently: - MSI Neo2 - FIS2R - P4 2.4CGHz 800 MHz FSB - 2 x CORSAIR XMS 512MB 64MX64 PC-3200C2PT (1 GB total) - 2 x 160GB Western Digital 7200rpm 8MB cache drives (I've actually had one for about 6 months, so I'm buying another to match it for RAID 0) I'm still researching to see if I need to upgrade my stock cooling to something heftier. Any suggestions? FYI, I like a quiet system (I'll be using an Enermax PSU). I don't see lots of posts of people using the MSI Neo2 board; is there any reason? I've read nothing but good things about it. I found out about it at THG, of course, but I followed up by finding several other reviews, all very favorable. The P4P800Deluxe seems to be a very popular board here. Is there any particular reason people like it over the Neo2-FIS2R? I'm still waffling on my committment to the 2.4 processor as well. Will a 2.6 or 2.8 actually allow me greater overclocking speeds, or are the rumors about all the new P4s reaching the same o/c'd speeds true? Should I get memory for higher fsb speeds? Is Corsair my best bet? Will the performance gains from o/c'ing offset the performance loss from using higher latency sticks? I'm dropping a lot of cash on this, and I AM on a budjet, but this is my first major upgrade in five years. My current system has seen me thru because I tried to take care to choose quality components (BH6 w/300a, more recently w/1100). I'm in this for the long haul. The MSI board seems not to have skimped on features and is fully loaded, even including CSA Gigabit LAN. Are there unpublicized issues of which I should be aware? I'm willing to spend a few more bucks if it means my system will have an extra year or two of useful life before obselescence overtakes it, or if it will ensure greater stability. Thoughts? Opinions? Thanks to all in advance. BJ "His eyes were empty, like two pools of water that were also empty." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks.
3. Why do you need 1Gb of memory? Unless you do stuff like intense video editing, more than 512Mb in two sticks isn't going to do you much good. I actually do a lot of editing of very large digital audio files, and have always had to deal with the bottleneck of paging large amounts of audio data. The 1GB of RAM, and the RAID 0, is my attempt to get as far away from that as possible. I'm not much into gaming these days, and bragging rights don't mean much to me, so I'm not into this so I can boast about some benchmark score to strangers in newsgroups. My main objectives are 1) to optimize my system for editing and manipulating huge amounts of raw digital audio data, and 2) to get some hands-on with hardware RAID 0, since I've wanted to try it for years. As an IT professional, I naturally don't see much RAID 0 in an enterprise environment. I want to play. :-) The faster bootup times will be nice, too. I have an older 45GB drive that'll work fine for archival purposes, and I also keep CD backups for the really important stuff. However, I may later invest in an extra-large capacity drive for archival purposes (I have another use to which I can put that 45GB drive.) Hey? What are you going to do for a video card? My video card will probably remain unchanged for now, as I'm not taxing it in the slightest these days. I'll upgrade it later. Here's my recommendation, with a lot more performance potential for about $12 more (unless you do lots of video editing, then add more memory and consider RAID-0 and another backup drive). ASUS P4P Deluxe P4 2.8 Ghz 800 FSB 2 x 256 Mb OCZ PC4000 WD Raptor SATA drive I'll look more closely at the 2.8 and the faster memory. Thanks again. BJ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank Weston" wrote snip 4. Before you drop a lot of cash for another HD and RAID-0 go he http://www.storagereview.com/index.html Do some homework on the subject, and you may change your mind. RAID-0 is for data you don't mind losing. You must backup frequently, and the speed improvement is debatable. With just two drives in RAID-0, where are you going to backup? Further, to implement RAID-0 your existing drive will have to be formatted. Do you really want to go through the hassle of moving all your data around? Your best bet for speed and reliability might be to add something like the WD Raptor SATA drive as your boot drive. For most applications, it will give you close to the same improvement you'll get from RAID-0, it's cheaper than the 160 GB drive, you won't have to transfer data from your old drive. Hi, interesting statement you made there. It makes me wonder how you came to this conclusion?. Did you spend a heap of time doing web-research or is this based on personal experience? Up to about one months ago I was believing the same thing but I decided to check out RAID-0 for myself using the onboard SATA ports 1 & 2 on the NF7-S (v2.0) with 2 x WD-Caviar SE 120GB drives. I am a total nOOb when it comes to RAID but I did a bit of simple reading and followed the instructions and voila!. I am very pleased with the 223GB C:\ drive I now have in Windows XP Pro, it has made a *MASSIVE* difference to the overall performance of my system. Didn't get to do any benchmarks yet but I did notice how fast it saves a 1GB DivX to disk. . .in 1 minute. This same task took something like 5+ minutes on my old ATA/66 IBMs. I guess what I am saying is, SATA RAID-0 is totally *JUICED!* Keeping in mind that I now have twice the chance to lose my system disk, so I will have to make sure I implement a good backup system. WD Raptors look nice but 36GB is whack. . . .except if you are running say a small database server or something like that, but for the same price you can get a nice 120GB SATA disk, like mine, it's was an easy choice for me to make. . . Wayne ][ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Bryan L" wrote
I'll look more closely at the 2.8 and the faster memory. Thanks again. Hi, I just built my new play system and it is going well so far. Just to touch base on a few points to do with memory. I too am swaying back & forth in my decision to go 512Mb total or 1GB. More than likely I will put in my order soon for 1GB. Now as to the Brand of memory well. . . . .I went with TwinMOS 2 x PC3500 256MB sticks (TwiSTER cas2) and I am not totally happy so far. I have since spec'd up some new Mushkin PC3500 memory (Level II cas2,2,2.0) which from the reviews I am seeing is the current *Ultimate* DDR memory for the nForce2 platform. Costs about £285.00 for a *matched module* kit containing 2 x 512MBs. . .certainly not small change but I am beginning to see how *quality* memory can make quite large *performance* gains. I'm still not 100% sure whether to stay with PC3500 or try for something higher (PC3700 or maybe PC4200) to try and future proof the investment, but knowing my luck they will bring out a new memory form-factor so my modules will be *incompatible* with future motherboards :P I think good PC3500 (read:Mushkin) can hit PC3700 speeds with pretty good timings. . . Wayne ][ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
My comments are based on personal experience and on doing a lot of research.
I'm currently running two Raptor SATA drives in RAID-0 with two IDE drives serving as backup. For most applications I run, I see little performance improvement. Benchmarks are super with the RAID-0, but don't seem to translate to the real world for me. But.....as I said, if you're doing a lot of video editing or similar work, lots of memory and fast drives will probably pay off. "Wayne Youngman" wrote in message ... "Frank Weston" wrote snip 4. Before you drop a lot of cash for another HD and RAID-0 go he http://www.storagereview.com/index.html Do some homework on the subject, and you may change your mind. RAID-0 is for data you don't mind losing. You must backup frequently, and the speed improvement is debatable. With just two drives in RAID-0, where are you going to backup? Further, to implement RAID-0 your existing drive will have to be formatted. Do you really want to go through the hassle of moving all your data around? Your best bet for speed and reliability might be to add something like the WD Raptor SATA drive as your boot drive. For most applications, it will give you close to the same improvement you'll get from RAID-0, it's cheaper than the 160 GB drive, you won't have to transfer data from your old drive. Hi, interesting statement you made there. It makes me wonder how you came to this conclusion?. Did you spend a heap of time doing web-research or is this based on personal experience? Up to about one months ago I was believing the same thing but I decided to check out RAID-0 for myself using the onboard SATA ports 1 & 2 on the NF7-S (v2.0) with 2 x WD-Caviar SE 120GB drives. I am a total nOOb when it comes to RAID but I did a bit of simple reading and followed the instructions and voila!. I am very pleased with the 223GB C:\ drive I now have in Windows XP Pro, it has made a *MASSIVE* difference to the overall performance of my system. Didn't get to do any benchmarks yet but I did notice how fast it saves a 1GB DivX to disk. . ..in 1 minute. This same task took something like 5+ minutes on my old ATA/66 IBMs. I guess what I am saying is, SATA RAID-0 is totally *JUICED!* Keeping in mind that I now have twice the chance to lose my system disk, so I will have to make sure I implement a good backup system. WD Raptors look nice but 36GB is whack. . . .except if you are running say a small database server or something like that, but for the same price you can get a nice 120GB SATA disk, like mine, it's was an easy choice for me to make. . . Wayne ][ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Thanks for all replies.
I think I've made most of my decisions with the helpful input from this group. My few remaining questions have to do with cooling and cases. For the moment, I think I'll see how far I can go with stock cooling, and make changes if I'm not satisfied with the results. I need a new case and PSU as well. I plan to go with an Enermax PSU, but have no strong feelings about a case at this point. I don't need anything flashy, at this point. Something well-designed and compact will fit the bill. Anybody have a favorite case? Once I've placed my order, I'll post the system details here, and follow up with my experiences when I get my parts and start to play. BJ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Bryan L" wrote in message om... Thanks for all replies. I think I've made most of my decisions with the helpful input from this group. My few remaining questions have to do with cooling and cases. For the moment, I think I'll see how far I can go with stock cooling, and make changes if I'm not satisfied with the results. I need a new case and PSU as well. I plan to go with an Enermax PSU, but have no strong feelings about a case at this point. I don't need anything flashy, at this point. Something well-designed and compact will fit the bill. Anybody have a favorite case? Once I've placed my order, I'll post the system details here, and follow up with my experiences when I get my parts and start to play. Regarding case and cooler, BestBuy has the Antec Sonata for $129 with a $30 rebate through the end of the month. It's a top-notch case designed for looks, convenience and quiet (reviews all over the web,) with an Antec TruePower 480 watt psu and a 120mm case fan thrown in. Yes, it's a bit pricey, but it's one of the best around. Like you, I decided to see how well I could do with a stock P4 cooler. It didn't inhibit overclocking, but once I got to 3.2g the temps were high enough to cause me concern. I got a Vantec Aeroflow from www.11cb.com for $24 with free shipping and it knocked 2-3 degrees C off idle and 8-10 off max load. 3.3g was squirrrely before, stable now. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Athlon64 upgrade help | XYZ | AMD x86-64 Processors | 5 | January 1st 05 08:02 PM |
Please help with upgrade info | James | General | 3 | August 6th 04 09:21 PM |
Upgrade Report [Hardware Tips: Get the Right Hard Drive - 05/11/2004] | Ablang | General | 0 | May 16th 04 03:17 AM |
weather to upgrade or buy new pc? | SteKewn | General | 3 | April 7th 04 02:54 PM |
A couple of upgrade questions | GeoffC | General | 6 | December 23rd 03 08:40 PM |