Cat 9.4 drivers

Are on the ATI site now.

--
Les

Are on the ATI site now.

Thanks for the headsup Les!

rms

Sure enough, as previously reported, Radeon cards older than the HD 2xxx
series have been dropped from the support list.


--
"War is the continuation of politics by other means.
It can therefore be said that politics is war without
bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed."

"rms" wrote in message
...
Are on the ATI site now.

Thanks for the headsup Les!

rms

In message "rms"
was claimed to have wrote:

Are on the ATI site now.

Thanks for the headsup Les!

rms


Looks like they lied about discontinuing their RSS feed... *whew*

Amen to the thanks...

Les Steel wrote:
Are on the ATI site now.

Where are the legacy drivers (say Radeon 9000 pro and X1300)?

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 8.04.2) Linux 2.6.28.9
^ ^ 16:12:01 up 5 days 3:25 1 user load average: 1.07 1.07 1.03
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ????? (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa

I had a few issues with the install of the 9.4 on a 4870X2 vista 64. It
would not recognize the card after installing. First install failed, final
install, monitor went black, I reset the PC, and on reboot the driver was
present, with device manager seeing the card.

Carl wrote:
I had a few issues with the install of the 9.4 on a 4870X2 vista 64. It
would not recognize the card after installing. First install failed,
final install, monitor went black, I reset the PC, and on reboot the
driver was present, with device manager seeing the card.

Did you remove the old driver COMPLETELY first?

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 8.04.2) Linux 2.6.28.9
^ ^ 17:47:01 up 5 days 5:00 1 user load average: 1.06 1.10 1.03
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ????? (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa

Man-wai Chang ToDie (+MS=V32B) wrote:
Carl wrote:
I had a few issues with the install of the 9.4 on a 4870X2 vista 64.
It would not recognize the card after installing. First install
failed, final install, monitor went black, I reset the PC, and on
reboot the driver was present, with device manager seeing the card.

Did you remove the old driver COMPLETELY first?


AND ...da da ... rebooted?

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 8.04.2) Linux 2.6.28.9
^ ^ 20:20:01 up 5 days 7:33 1 user load average: 1.00 1.00 1.00
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ????? (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa

Did you remove the old driver COMPLETELY first?

Yep, uninstalled, then ran drivercleaner twice.

"Man-wai Chang ToDie (+MS=V32B)" wrote in message
...
Carl wrote:
I had a few issues with the install of the 9.4 on a 4870X2 vista 64. It
would not recognize the card after installing. First install failed,
final install, monitor went black, I reset the PC, and on reboot the
driver was present, with device manager seeing the card.

Did you remove the old driver COMPLETELY first?

--
@~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY.
/ v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you!
/( _ )\ (Xubuntu 8.04.2) Linux 2.6.28.9
^ ^ 17:47:01 up 5 days 5:00 1 user load average: 1.06 1.10 1.03
???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ???! ????? (CSSA):
http://www.swd.gov.hk/tc/index/site_...sub_addressesa

That's really not necessary any more. I used to (meaning with every single
Catalyst update from version 5.x to 8.x) meticulously clean out the old
driver, registry, reboot before installing the new one. It was probably
necessary at the time. Starting with the latest 8's all the way up to 9.3
using both XP-32 and Vista-64 I have never, not once, uninstalled the old
drivers before installing the new. I have not seen one installation artifact
as a result of that. What I have seen is a lot less hassle in Cat driver
updates.

Your mileage may vary, of course.

Tony