If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Processor upgrade?
I have a 1 year old machine with a 2500 Athalon XP 510mb ram and SATA
hard drive. Assuming my Mobo is capable, what kind of improvement could I expect if I upgraded to a 3200 Athalon 400? Would there be a perceivable difference? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Nicholas" wrote in message
... " Assuming my Mobo is capable, what kind of improvement could I expect if I upgraded to a 3200 Athalon 400? " If you already have the right equipment, then you may not need to spend anything to get 3200+ performance. What motherboard, RAM and PSU do you have? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Nicholas wrote: I have a 1 year old machine with a 2500 Athalon XP 510mb ram and SATA hard drive. Assuming my Mobo is capable, what kind of improvement could I expect if I upgraded to a 3200 Athalon 400? Would there be a perceivable difference? What applications do you run? For games, you are much better off buying a new motherboard and getting an Athlon 64. 510 meg? Does your system have graphics integrated on the motherboard? If so, you might want to invest in a $30-100 graphics card(see if you have an AGP port or not).Going from an Athlon XP2500+ to an XP 3200+ won't give you that much performance boost. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:06:30 -0400, Nicholas wrote:
I have a 1 year old machine with a 2500 Athalon XP 510mb ram and SATA hard drive. Assuming my Mobo is capable, what kind of improvement could I expect if I upgraded to a 3200 Athalon 400? Would there be a perceivable difference? No |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:06:30 -0400, Nicholas
wrote: I have a 1 year old machine with a 2500 Athalon XP 510mb ram and SATA hard drive. Assuming my Mobo is capable, what kind of improvement could I expect if I upgraded to a 3200 Athalon 400? Would there be a perceivable difference? Perceivable, yes, but worth the cost and bother, probably not. It's only about 20% clock increase and the higher FSB will help some too, but the rest of the system will still have same components. If you'd planned to sell the XP2500 and expect fair return on it, the upgrade might make more sense, but even so you might be better off to get another 512MB of memory if you're itchin' to upgrade something. For more substantial performance increase it's time to rebuilt an Athlon 64 box.... but then again you didn't mention what (tasks) need more performance. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I use my machine for AutoCad, CorelDraw/Photoshop and other graphic
software. Internet access and simple word processing/spreadsheet work. The particulars. OS Name Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600 Mobo: Leadtek K7NCR18D Pro2 nForce2 Video: NVIDIA gForce FX5200 System Model AWRDACPI System Type X86-based PC Processor x86 Family 6 Model 10 Stepping 0 AuthenticAMD ~1837 Mhz BIOS Version/Date Phoenix Technologies, LTD 6.00 PG, 8/11/2003 SMBIOS Version 2.2 Total Physical Memory 512.00 MB Available Physical Memory 174.96 MB Total Virtual Memory 2.00 GB Available Virtual Memory 1.96 GB Page File Space 1.22 GB Page File C:\pagefile.sys kony wrote: On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:06:30 -0400, Nicholas wrote: I have a 1 year old machine with a 2500 Athalon XP 510mb ram and SATA hard drive. Assuming my Mobo is capable, what kind of improvement could I expect if I upgraded to a 3200 Athalon 400? Would there be a perceivable difference? Perceivable, yes, but worth the cost and bother, probably not. It's only about 20% clock increase and the higher FSB will help some too, but the rest of the system will still have same components. If you'd planned to sell the XP2500 and expect fair return on it, the upgrade might make more sense, but even so you might be better off to get another 512MB of memory if you're itchin' to upgrade something. For more substantial performance increase it's time to rebuilt an Athlon 64 box.... but then again you didn't mention what (tasks) need more performance. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:41:11 -0400, Nicholas wrote:
I use my machine for AutoCad, CorelDraw/Photoshop and other graphic software. Internet access and simple word processing/spreadsheet work. The particulars. OS Name Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600 Mobo: Leadtek K7NCR18D Pro2 nForce2 Video: NVIDIA gForce FX5200 System Model AWRDACPI System Type X86-based PC Processor x86 Family 6 Model 10 Stepping 0 AuthenticAMD ~1837 Mhz BIOS Version/Date Phoenix Technologies, LTD 6.00 PG, 8/11/2003 SMBIOS Version 2.2 Total Physical Memory 512.00 MB Available Physical Memory 174.96 MB Total Virtual Memory 2.00 GB Available Virtual Memory 1.96 GB Page File Space 1.22 GB Page File C:\pagefile.sys kony wrote: On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:06:30 -0400, Nicholas wrote: I have a 1 year old machine with a 2500 Athalon XP 510mb ram and SATA hard drive. Assuming my Mobo is capable, what kind of improvement could I expect if I upgraded to a 3200 Athalon 400? Would there be a perceivable difference? Perceivable, yes, but worth the cost and bother, probably not. It's only about 20% clock increase and the higher FSB will help some too, but the rest of the system will still have same components. If you'd planned to sell the XP2500 and expect fair return on it, the upgrade might make more sense, but even so you might be better off to get another 512MB of memory if you're itchin' to upgrade something. For more substantial performance increase it's time to rebuilt an Athlon 64 box.... but then again you didn't mention what (tasks) need more performance. As a general rule of thumb you shouldn't upgrade a system unless you are going to at least double the performance, I don't do it for less than 4X. The only way you can double the performance of your present system is to get a dual Opteron. However given your workload it's not clear that a dual Opteron will help you. You should wait another 18 months before replacing that system. In the meantime you should up your RAM to 1G, that can make a big difference and it's not very expensive. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Nicholas wrote:
I use my machine for AutoCad, CorelDraw/Photoshop and other graphic software. Internet access and simple word processing/spreadsheet work. The particulars. OS Name Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition Version 5.1.2600 Service Pack 2 Build 2600 Mobo: Leadtek K7NCR18D Pro2 nForce2 Video: NVIDIA gForce FX5200 System Model AWRDACPI System Type X86-based PC Processor x86 Family 6 Model 10 Stepping 0 AuthenticAMD ~1837 Mhz BIOS Version/Date Phoenix Technologies, LTD 6.00 PG, 8/11/2003 SMBIOS Version 2.2 Total Physical Memory 512.00 MB Available Physical Memory 174.96 MB Total Virtual Memory 2.00 GB Available Virtual Memory 1.96 GB Page File Space 1.22 GB Page File C:\pagefile.sys I hate top-posting. What speed is your memory rated at? Does that board support a 200Mhz FSB? Is your CPU currently running cool enough? I'd just change the FSB setting in BIOS to 200 and monitor the temp. Run Prime95 to test stability, if it fails, bump up vcore a bit at a time until it doesn't fail. _Keeping an eye on temps_. I've never bought an XP3200 yet but I've set up plenty of machines using an XP2500 that run at 3200 speed perfectly well and reliably. -- ~misfit~ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Nicholas" wrote in message
... " I use my machine for AutoCad, CorelDraw/Photoshop and other graphic software. Internet access and simple word processing/spreadsheet work. " Your Leadtek K7NCR18D Pro2 is a dual-channel 400FSB motherboard. If your RAM is rated at PC3200, I would suggest getting another identical stick. If you then set the FSB to 400, and implement dual-channel, you'll have upgraded your system on four levels: 1. Ram size increased from 512MB to 1GB. 2. FSB raised from 333 to 400. 3. Dual-channel implemented. 4. CPU clock raised from 1833MHz to 2200MHz. You didn't state the amount of RAM your FX5200 has. For your graphic software useage, there could be a noticeable difference between the 64MB, 128MB and 256MB versions. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Cuzman" wrote in message ... "Nicholas" wrote in message ... " I use my machine for AutoCad, CorelDraw/Photoshop and other graphic software. Internet access and simple word processing/spreadsheet work. " Your Leadtek K7NCR18D Pro2 is a dual-channel 400FSB motherboard. If your RAM is rated at PC3200, I would suggest getting another identical stick. If you then set the FSB to 400, and implement dual-channel, you'll have upgraded your system on four levels: 1. Ram size increased from 512MB to 1GB. 2. FSB raised from 333 to 400. 3. Dual-channel implemented. 4. CPU clock raised from 1833MHz to 2200MHz. You didn't state the amount of RAM your FX5200 has. For your graphic software useage, there could be a noticeable difference between the 64MB, 128MB and 256MB versions. few case fans if he wants to overclock the 2500 to 3200 speeds |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|